The problem that the concept of ‘class’ describes is inequality. The transition from industrial to financial capitalism (neoliberalism) in Europe has effected ‘deepening inequalities of income, health and life chances within and between countries, on a scale not seen since before the second world War’ (Hall et al., 2014: 9). In this context, class is an essential point of orientation for sociology if it is to grasp the problem of inequality today. Tracing a route through Pierre Bourdieu's relational understanding of class, Beverley Skeggs' understanding of class as struggles (over value), and Wendy Brown's argument that neoliberalism is characterized by the culturalization of political struggles, this article animates forms of class-analysis, with which we might better apprehend the forms of class exploitation that distinguish post-industrial societies. Taking a cue from Jacques Rancière, the central argument is that the sociology of class should be grounded not in the assumption and valorization of class identities but in an understanding of class as struggles against classification. In this way, sociology can contribute to the development of alternative social and political imaginaries to the biopolitics of disposability symptomatic of neoliberal governmentality.
ClarkeJ. and NewmanJ., (2007), ‘What's in a name? New Labour's citizen-consumers and the remaking of public services’, Cultural Studies, 21 (4-5): 738–757.
14.
CrossleyT and SlaterT., (2014), ‘Benefits Street: territorial stigmatisation and the realization of a “(tele)vision of divisions”’, available at: https://values.doc.gold.ac.uk/blog/18 (accessed 14 November 2014).
15.
CouldryN., (2008), ‘Reality TV, or the secret theater of neoliberalism’, Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 30 (1): 3–13.
16.
DeanJ., (2012), The Communist Horizon, London: Verso.
17.
DowlingE., and HarvieD., (2014), ‘Harnessing the social: state crises and (big) society’, Sociology, 48 (5): 869–886.
18.
EhrenreichB., (1989), Fear of Falling: The Inner Life of the Middle Class, New York: Pantheon Books.
19.
FraserN., (1997), Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, London: Routledge.
20.
GirouxH., (2007), ‘Violence, Katrina, and the biopolitics of disposability’, Theory Culture Society, 24 (7–8): 305–309.
21.
GruskyD., (1993), ‘Social stratification’, in OuthwaiteW. and BottomoreT. (eds), The Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Social Thought, 610–613, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
22.
HallS., and O'SheaA., (2014), ‘Common-sense neoliberalism’, in HallS.MasseyD. and RustinM. (eds), After Neoliberalism? The Kilburn Manifesto, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
23.
HallS.MasseyD., and RustinM. (2014), ‘After neoliberalism: analysing the present’, in HallS.MasseyD. and RustinM. (eds), After Neoliberalism? The Kilburn Manifesto, 3–19, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
24.
HarveyD., (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
HaylettC., (2001), ‘Illegitimate subjects? Abject whites, neoliberal modernisation, and middle-class multiculturalism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19 (3): 351–370.
26.
HigsonA., (1996) ‘Space, place, spectacle: landscape and townscape in the “kitchen sink” film’, in HigsonA. (ed.), Dissolving Views: Key Writings on British Cinema, 133–156, London: Cassell.
27.
IfekwunigweJ., (2004), ‘Recasting Black Venus in the new African diaspora’, Women's Studies International Forum, 27 (4): 397–412.
28.
JacksonE., and BensonM., (2014), ‘Neither “deepest, darkest Peckham” nor “run-of-the-mill” East Dulwich: the middle classes and their “others” in an inner-London neighbourhood’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38 (4): 1195–1210.
JensenT., (2014b), ‘Pride, propaganda and poverty porn: on benefits and proud’, Sociological Imagination blog, available at: http://sociologicalimagination.org/archives/14786 (accessed 11 November 2014).
31.
JensenT., (2014c), ‘Welfare commonsense, poverty porn and doxosophy’, Sociological Research Online19 (3), available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/3/3.html (accessed 11 November 2014).
32.
JonesO., (2011), Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class, London: Verso.
33.
LawlerS., (2005), ‘Disgusted subjects: the making of middle-class identities’, The Sociological Review, 53 (3): 429–446.
34.
McKenzieL., (2015), Getting By: Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain, Bristol: Policy Press.
35.
McRobbieA., (2005), ‘Notes on “what not to wear” and post-feminist symbolic violence’, in AdkinsL. and SkeggsB. (eds), Feminism after Bourdieu, 99–109. Oxford: Blackwell.
PhillipsA., (2010), ‘What's wrong with essentialism?’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 11 (1): 47–60.
40.
PikettyT., in O'NeillM. Martin, and PearceN., (2014), ‘Inequality and what to do about it: Thomas Piketty (interview)’, Renewal: A Journal of Social Democracy22 (3/4): 101–115.
41.
RaisboroughJ., and AdamsM., (2008), ‘Mockery and morality in popular cultural representations of the white working class’, Sociological Research Online, 13 (6): 2, available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/6/2.html (accessed 11 November 2014).
42.
RancièreJ., (1999), Dis-agreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. RoseJ.Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
RigbyJ., (2014), The Excess of Migration, PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
44.
SavageM., and WilliamsK., (2008), Remembering Elites, Oxford: Blackwell.
SayerA., (2014), Why We Can't Afford the Rich, Bristol: Policy Press.
47.
SennettR., and CobbJ., (1972), The Hidden Injuries of Class, New York: Vintage.
48.
ShildrichT., and MacDonaldR., (2013), ‘Poverty talk: how people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame the poor’, Sociological Review, 61 (2): 286–303.
SkeggsB., (2005a), ‘Context and background: Pierre Bourdieu's analysis of class, gender and sexuality’, in AdkinsL. and SkeggsB. (eds), Feminism after Bourdieu, 19–33, Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
SkeggsB., (2005b), ‘The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation’, Sociology, 39 (5): 965–982.
52.
SkeggsB., (2011), ‘Imagining personhood differently: person value and autonomist working class value practices’, Sociological Review, 59 (3): 579–594.
53.
SkeggsB., and WoodH., (2008), ‘The labour of transformation and circuits of value “around” reality’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 22 (4): 559–572.
54.
SlaterT., (2014), ‘The myth of “Broken Britain”: welfare reform and the production of ignorance’, Antipode, 46 (4): 948–969.
TylerI., (2008), ‘“Chav mum chav scum”: class disgust in contemporary Britain’, Feminist Media Studies, 8 (1): 17–34.
59.
TylerI., (2011), ‘Pramface girls: the class politics of “maternal TV”’, in WoodH. and SkeggsB. (eds), Reality Television and Class, 210–224, London: BFI, Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
TylerI., (2013), Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain, London: Zed.
61.
VirdeeS., (2014), Racism, Class and the Racialized Outsider, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
62.
WacquantL., (2008), Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality, Cambridge: Polity Press.
63.
WacquantL., (2012), ‘Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism’, Social Anthropology, 20 (1): 66–79.
64.
WacquantL., (2013), ‘Symbolic power and group-making: on Pierre Bourdieu's reframing of class’, Journal of Classical Sociology, 13 (2): 274–291.
65.
WardeA., (2011), ‘Cultural hostility re-considered’, Cultural Sociology, 5 (3): 341–366.
66.
WatertonC., (2003), ‘Performing the classification of nature’, in SzerszynskiB.HeimW. and WatertonC. (eds.), Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance, 111–129, Oxford: Blackwell.
67.
WatertonC., (2010), ‘Barcoding nature: strategic naturalization and innovatory practice in the genomic ordering of things’, The Sociological Review, 52 (Suppl. 1): 152–171.
WilliamsR., (1960), Culture and Society 1780-1950, New York: Anchor Books.
70.
WillmsJ., (2004), Conversations with Ulrich Beck, Cambridge: Polity Press.
71.
WoodH. and SkeggsB., (2010), ‘Reacting to reality TV: the affective economy of an “extended social/public realm”’, in KraidyM. and SenderK. (eds.), Real Worlds: The Global Politics of Reality TV, 93–106, New York: Routledge.
