Digital Intermediation in Paid Domestic Work in Argentina: An Analysis of Ambivalent Effects on Working Conditions

Abstract

Recent studies offer ambivalent conclusions on the effect of digital intermediaries in domestic and care work; while some suggest that the digital platforms exacerbate and perpetuate the precariousness of the sector as well as its underlying social inequalities, others contend that the effects of these technologies are not yet clear. Drawing on these perspectives but focusing specifically on the platforms’ organizational structures, this article contributes to a growing body of scholarship on the differential impact of digital intermediaries in this occupation. Based on a study of the digital platform Zolvers in Argentina, the article analyzes the effects on working conditions of three types of working arrangements: regular work managed by the digital intermediary, regular work managed by the employer household, and casual ‘one-time-only’ jobs. This research uses a mixed methods approach, including a survey of 300 domestic workers, 20 semi-directed interviews, and two focus groups with workers using Zolvers.

Keywords

digital platforms digital intermediaries domestic work care work business models recruitment sociology of work Argentina

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrada

Moreira Cardoso

Araujo Guimaraes

, et al. (2023) Plataformas digitais de cuidado no Brasil. Acceso e controle do trabalho no entrecruzamento de múltiplas crisis. Tiempo Social, Revista de Sociologia da USP 35(3): 1–31.

Asaïs

(2014) Normes d’emploi, hybridation et zone grise chez les pilotes d’hélicoptère au Brésil. Revue Tiers Monde 2(218): 53–70.

Berg

Furrer

Harmon

, et al. (2018) Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_645337/lang–en/index.htm

Blanchard

(2023) Las plataformas digitales de cuidados y sus servicios workertech en América Latina y el Caribe. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Available at: https://publications.iadb.org/es/las-plataformas-digitales-de-cuidados-y-sus-servicios-workertech-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe

Bureau

M-C

Dieudaide

(2018) Institutional change and transformations in labour and amployment standdards: an analysis of ‘grey zones’. Tranfer 24(3): 261–277.

Cebollada

(2021) Mecanismos de intermediación laboral en el trabajo del hogar remunerado en la Ciudad de México. Ciudad de México, Mexico: OIT para México y Cuba. Available at: https://ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—americas/—ro-lima/—ilo-mexico/documents/publication/wcms_836285.pdf

Cherry

(2016) Beyond misclassification: the digital transformation of work. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 37(3): 544–577.

De Stefano

(2016) The Rise of the ‘Just-in-time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig Economy’. Geneva: ILO. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_protect/—protrav/—travail/documents/publication/wcms_443267.pdf

Digital Future Society (2021) Los cuidados a domicilio y las plataformas digitales en España. Available at: https://digitalfuturesociety.com/es/report/cuidados-domicilio-plataformas-digitales-espana/

10.

Espino

(2011) Trabajo y género: un viejo tema ¿nuevas miradas? Nueva Sociedad 232: 86–102.

11.

Faur

Pereyra

(2018) Gramáticas del cuidado. In: Piovani

Salvia

(eds) La Argentina en el siglo XXI. Cómo somos, vivimos y convivimos en una sociedad desigual. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI, pp.497–534.

12.

Ferreira Vale

Nociolini Rebechi

(2021) Uberizaçao do trabalho doméstico remunerado: formas prescritivas de trabalho na Plataforma Donamaid. In: Ponencia presentada en el XVII Encontro Nacional da ABET, Uberlândia, Brazil, 28 October. Available at: https://www.even3.com.br/anais/abet_trabalho2021/340610-uberizacao-do-trabalho-domestico-remunerado–formas-prescritivas-de-trabalho-na-plataforma-donamaid/

13.

Fetterolf

(2022) It’s crowded at the bottom: trust, visibility, and search algorithms on Care.com. Journal Digital Social Research 40: 49–72.

14.

Flanagan

(2019) Theorising the gig economy and home-based service work. Journal of Industrial Relations 6: 57–78.

15.

Fragale Filho

dos Santos Lima

(2024) Alguém se meteu no meio: modelos de intermediação digital do trabalho doméstico no Brasil. Revista De Estudios Sociales 89: 81–99.

16.

Gorbán

Tizziani

(2018) ¿Cada una en su lugar? Trabajo, género y clase en el servicio doméstico. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Biblos.

17.

Gruszka

Pilinger

Gerold

, et al. (2022) (De)evaluation of household cleaning in the platform economy. Working paper no. 44/2022. Wien: Institute for Ecological Economics. Available at: https://research.wu.ac.at/en/publications/devaluation-of-household-cleaning-in-the-platform-economy

18.

Hunt

Machingura

(2016) A good gig? The rise of on-demand domestic work. Working paper. London: The Overseas Development Institute. Available at: https://odi.org/en/publications/a-good-gig-the-rise-of-on-demand-domestic-work/

19.

Hunt

Samman

(2019) Gender and the gig economy. Critical steps for evidence-based policy. Working paper no. 546. The Overseas Development Institute. Available at: https://odi.org/en/publications/gender-and-the-gig-economy-critical-steps-for-evidence-based-policy/

20.

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2021) Making Decent Work a Reality for Domestic Workers. Progress and Prospects Ten Years after the Adoption of the Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 (No. 189). Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/publications/major-publications/making-decent-work-reality-domestic-workers-progress-and-prospects-ten

21.

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2023) Country practices for measuring informal sector and informal employment. In: Room document to support the discussions at the meeting of experts on labour statistics in preparation for the 21st international conference of labour statisticians. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/resource/conference-paper/country-practices-measuring-informal-sector-and-informal-employment

22.

Ivanova

Bronowicka

Kocher

, et al. (2018) The App as a Boss? Control and Autonomy in Application-Based Management. Frankfurt: Europa Universität Viadrina (ARBEIT/GRENZE/FLUSS). Available at: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-euv/frontdoor/index/index/docId/388

23.

Jaherling

Pereyra

Poblete

(2024) Introduction: the formalization of paid domestic work—current trajectories and challenges ahead. International Labour Review 163(3): 359–375.

24.

Kalla

(2022) Hacking platform capitalism: the case of domestic workers on South Africa’s SweepSouth Platform. Gender & Development 30: 655–666.

25.

Kocher

(2022) Digital Work Platforms at the Interface of Labour Law: Regulating Market Organisers. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

26.

Macdonald

(2021) ‘Personalised risk’ in paid care work and the impacts of ‘gig economy’ care platforms and other market-based organisations. International Journal of Care and Caring 5: 9–25.

27.

Madariaga

Buenadicha

Molina

, et al. (2019) Economía de plataformas y empleo ¿Cómo es trabajar para una app en Argentina? Buenos Aires, Argentina: CIPPEC–BID—OIT.

28.

McDonald

Williams

Mayes

(2021) Means of control in the organization of digitally intermediated care work. Work, Employment & Society 35: 872–890.

29.

Micha

(2024) Plataformas de trabajo doméstico y de cuidados en América Latina: una tipología según la clasificación laboral de las trabajadoras. Revista De Estudios Sociales 89: 23–41.

30.

Micha

Pereyra

Monsalvo

(2024) Características y determinantes de la participación laboral reciente de las mujeres de sectores populares en Argentina. In: Gorban D and Tizziani A (eds) Fronteras de género en el mundo del trabajo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones UNGS, pp.23–62.

31.

Morin

M-L

(1999) Prestation de travail et activité de service. Paris: La Documentation Française.

32.

Muralidhara

(2022) Informal workers harnessing the power of digital platforms in India. In: Alfers

Chen

Plagerson

(eds) Social Contracts and Informal Workers in the Global South. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.169–188.

33.

Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) (2021) El trabajo doméstico remunerado en América Latina y el Caribe a diez años del Convenio núm.189. Lima, Peru: OIT, Oficina Regional para América Latina y el Caribe. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/es/publications/el-trabajo-domestico-remunerado-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe-diez-anos-del

34.

Osiki

(2024) Towards transition from an academic project to WeCare workers enterprise: lessons from the digital platform cooperative project in South Africa. In: Paper presented at the digital intermediaries in domestic and care work workshop, Oñati International Institute of Sociology of Law, 2–4 May. Available at: https://www.iisj.net/sites/default/files/240425_final_programme.pdf

35.

Paul

(2024) Unpacking cross-country variations in domestic worker protection regimes: adopting a policy regime perspective. International Labour Review 163(3): 377–396.

36.

Pereyra

(2017) Trabajadoras domésticas y protección social en Argentina: avances y desafíos pendientes. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Oficina de país de la OIT para Argentina. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/es/publications/trabajadoras-domesticas-y-proteccion-social-en-argentina-avances-y-desafios-0

37.

Pereyra

Poblete

(2024) The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina. International Labour Review 163(3): 435–454.

38.

Pereyra

Tizziani

(2013) Usos y apropiaciones de la regulación laboral por parte de las trabajadoras domésticas en Argentina. El impacto de las transformaciones recientes y los desafíos pendientes. Estudios del Trabajo 45: 65–90.

39.

Pereyra

Poblete

Tizziani

(2023) Plataformas digitales de servicio doméstico y condiciones laborales. El caso de Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Oficina de país de la OIT para Argentina. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/es/publications/plataformas-digitales-de-servicio-domestico-y-condiciones-laborales-el-caso

40.

Pérez

Gandolfi

(2024) From dead letter to functional policy? Domestic workers’ rights and ‘disformality’ in Peru. International Labour Review 163(3): 455–476.

41.

Poblete

(2019) The different meanings of formalisation. Experiments from the South: the case of Argentina (Chapter 7).In: Ashiagbor

(ed.) Re-Imagining Labour Law for Development: Informal Work in the Global North and South. London: Hart Publishing, pp.167–189.

42.

Poblete

Pereyra

Tizziani

(2024a) La intermediación digital en el trabajo doméstico remunerado en América Latina: una propuesta analítica para su estudio. Revista De Estudios Sociales 89: 3–22.

43.

Poblete

Tizziani

Pereyra

(2024b) Plataformas digitales y formalización laboral. El trabajo doméstico remunerado en Argentina durante la pandemia. Perfiles Latinoamericanos 32(63): 6.

44.

Posso

Castiblanco Moreno

Pineda Duque

(2024) Plataformas digitales del trabajo de cuidado doméstico remunerado en Colombia: el caso de Hogarú. Revista De Estudios Sociales 89: 101–118.

45.

Pralss

(2018) Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

46.

Pulignano

(2024) Unveiling ‘algorithm governance’ shaping labor platforms’ strategies and working conditions in the digital era. Weizenbaum. Journal of the Digital Society 4(3): 1–10.

47.

Pulignano

Franke

(2022) Control and consent regime dynamics within labour platforms. Work in the Global Economy 2(2): 149–175.

48.

Pulignano

Marà

Franke

(2023) Informal employment on domestic care platforms: a study on the individualization of risk and unpaid labour in mature market contexts. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 29: 323–338.

49.

Rani

Rishabh Kumar

Gobel

(2022) Delivery workers, trapped in an algorithmic system. Sociologia: Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto 2022: 11–31.

50.

Reygadas

(2020) Zolvers, Rapitenderos y Microtaskers. Trabajadores de plataformas en América Latina. In: Palermo

Capogrossi

(eds) Tratado Latinoamericano de Antropología del Trabajo (editado por, 1945–1988). Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO, pp.1945–1988.

51.

Rodríguez

(2019) La trascendencia de la disponibilidad horaria del trabajador en el contexto de las plataformas digitales. Temas Laborales 146: 121–158.

52.

Rodríguez-Modroño

(2024) A taxonomie of business models of digital care platforms in Spain. Sociology Compass 18: 1–15.

53.

Rodríguez-Modroño

Angenjo-Calderón

López-Igual

(2022) Platform work in the domestic and home care sector: new mechanisms of invisibility and exploitation of women migrant workers. Gender & Development 30: 619–635.

54.

Schoenbaum

(2016) Gender and the Sharing Economy. Fordham Urban Law Journal 43: 1023.

55.

Sibiya

du Toit

(2022) Sweeping up decent work: paid domestic work and digital platform in South Africa. Gender & Development 30: 637–654.

56.

Spreen

(1992) Rare populations, hidden populations, and link-tracing designs: what and why? Bulletin de Métholodogie Sociologique 36(1): 34–58.

57.

Sun

Chen

Rani

(2021) From flexible labour to ‘sticky labour’: a tracking study of workers in the food-delivery platform. Work, Employment and Society 37(2): 412–431.

58.

Tandon

Rathi

(2021) Fault lines at the front lines: care work and digital platforms in South and Southeast Asia. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/singapur/17840.pdf

59.

Tandon

Rathi

(2024) Sustaining urban labour markets: situating migration and domestic work in India’s ‘gig’ economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 56: 1245–1261.

60.

Teixeira

(2024) ¿Más de lo mismo? Condiciones laborales de las trabajadoras del hogar en las plataformas digitales en México. Revista de Estudios Sociales 89: 43–59.

61.

Ticona

Mateescu

(2018) Trusted strangers: carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society 20: 4384–4404.

62.

Tizziani

Poblete

(2022) La intervención de plataformas digitales en el trabajo doméstico remunerado en Argentina. Sociedade e Cultura 25: e71033.

63.

Todolí Signes

(2017) The ‘gig-economy’: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23: 193–205.

64.

Trojansky

(2020) Towards the ‘uber-isation’ of care? Platform work in the sector of long-term home care and its implications for workers’ rights. Workers’. Brussels: EU, Economic and Social Committee.

65.

Van Doorn

(2017) Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society 20: 898–914.

66.

Vega Ruiz

M-L

(2011) L’administration et l’inspection du travail dans le domaine du travail domestique: les expériences de l’Amérique latine. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 23: 341–358.