South-South Investments: Driver for Alternative Globalization? Examining China-Led Special Economic Zones in Brazil and South Africa

Abstract

The formation of BRICS marks a significant aspect of 21st-century globalization. This has spurred optimism in the Global South about offering an alternative to Western dominance. China has aimed to expand its global presence and influence, framing its relations as ‘South-South Cooperation’. Brazil and South Africa are crucial partners within BRICS, receiving significant Chinese investment, loans, and assistance. In this article, we critically examine South-South investments through a comparative analysis of Chinese investments in South Africa and Brazil, focusing on the case studies of the Manaus Industrial Park and the Musina-Makhado Special Economic Zone. Our research employs ethnographic fieldwork and secondary sources to analyze Chinese investments and their socio-environmental impact. We begin with a discussion of globalization and current trends of deglobalization by proposing three dimensions to analyze the role of BRICS. While Chinese investment could offer an alternative to Western financing, a more balanced South-South agenda is needed. Both Brazilian and South African state and non-state actors must advocate for better conditions to avoid repeating patterns of resource exploitation and subordination. This shifts the debate beyond traditional dichotomies. Ultimately, embracing South-South FDI and Cooperation must be accompanied by critical analysis to ensure a truly transformative agenda for the Global South.

Keywords

Chinese investments special economic zones BRICS Brazil South Africa deglobalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amsi

Bond

Kamidza

, et al. (2015) BRICS corporate snapshots during African extractivism. In: Bond

Garcia

(eds) BRICS, an Anti-Capitalist Critique. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jacana Media, 97–116.

Articulação Internacional dos Atingidos pela Vale (AIAAV) (2021) Vale unsustainability report. Available at: https://atingidosvale.com/relatorios/vale-unsustainability-report-2021/ (accessed 14 October 2023).

Baumann

(2022) Globalização, desglobalização e o Brasil. Revista de Economia Política 42(3): 592–618.

Bello

(2014) The BRICS: challengers to the global status quo. Foreign Policy in Focus, 29 August. Available at: https://fpif.org/brics-challengers-global-status-quo/

Berringer

Belasques

(2020) As relações Brasil-China nos governos Lula e Dilma: burguesia interna e subordinação conflitiva. Carta Internacional 15(3): 151–173.

Bond

(2016) BRICS banking and the debate over sub-imperialism. Third World Quarterly 37(4): 611–629.

Brancacio

Califano

(2023) War, sanctions, deglobalization: which comes first? Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 66(1): e004.

Brasil (2014a) Declaração Conjunta entre Brasil e China por ocasião da visita de Estado de Xi Jinping. Brasília, Brazil: Ministério das Relações Exteriores.

Brasil (2014b) República Popular da China. Brasília, Brazil: Ministério das Relações Exteriores.

10.

Brasil (2017) Atos assinados por ocasião da visita do presidente Michel Temer à China – Pequim. Brasília, Brazil: Ministério das Relações Exteriores.

11.

Brasil (2019a) Brasil assina acordos sanitários para exportação de carne processada e farelo de algodão. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Available at: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/brasil-assina-acordos-sanitarios-para-exportacao-de-carne-termoprocessada-e-farelo-de-algodao-para-a-china (accessed 2 May 2024).

12.

Brasil (2019b) Visita de Estado do Presidente da República, Jair Bolsonaro, a Pequim (China). Brasília, Brazil: Ministério das Relações Exteriores.

13.

Brasil (2023) Declaração de Joanesburgo II – Sandton, Gauteng, África do Sul – 23 de agosto. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mre/pt-br/canais_atendimento/imprensa/notas-a-imprensa/declaracao-de-joanesburgo-ii-sandton-gauteng-africa-do-sul-23-de-agosto-de-2023 (accessed 2 May 2024).

14.

Brasil (n.d.) ComexVis. Comex Stat. Ministério do Desenvolvimento, Indústria, Comércio e Serviços. Available at: http://comexstat.mdic.gov.br/pt/comex-vis (accessed 14 October 2023).

15.

Brito

(2017) Made in China / Produzido no Polo Industrial da Zona Franca de Manaus: o trabalho nas fábricas chinesas. Doctoral Thesis in Sociology, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.

16.

Brito

(2023) China and Globalization in the Amazon: Workers, Expatriates, and the Chinese Production Model. New York: Routledge.

17.

Carciotto

Chikohomero

(2022) Chinese labor practices in six southern African countries (Monograph 207). Institute for Security Studies. Available at: https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/Mono-207.pdf

18.

Cariello

(2021) Investimentos chineses no Brasil: histórico, tendências e desafios globais (2007-2020). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Conselho Empresarial Brasil-China.

19.

Cariello

(2022) Investimentos chineses no Brasil: Tecnologia e Transição Energética. Rio de Janeiro: Conselho Empresarial Brasil-China.

20.

Carmody

(2015) The new scramble for Africa. Jacobin Magazin. Available at: https://jacobin.com/2015/12/china-south-africa-imperialism-zambia-brics-globalization (accessed 2 May 2024).

21.

Darnal

(2023) The ‘global south’ is a valid concept. Deal with it. World Politics Review, September 28. Available at: https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/global-south-countries-term-brics/ (accessed 2 May 2024).

22.

Desai

(2013) The BRICS are building a challenge to Western economic supremacy. The Guardian, 2 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/02/brics-challenge-western-supremacy

23.

Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the Republic of South Africa (2018) ‘2018 FOCAC Beijing summit: what to expect. Available at: http://za.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zngx_1/202401/t20240104_11218319.htm (accessed March 2024).

24.

FOCAC (2018) Forum on China-Africa cooperation Beijing action plan (2019-2021). Available at: http://www.focac.org/eng/zywx_1/zywj/201809/t20180912_7933578.htm (accessed 30 October 2023).

25.

Garcia

(2020) Investimentos da China no Brasil, África do Sul e Índia: arranjos institucionais, atores e impactos. Revista Tempo do Mundo. Available at: https://www.ipea.gov.br/revistas/index.php/rtm/article/view/240

26.

Garcia

Ibanez

(2023) Brics expandido, e agora? Novos desafios para a política externa brasileira. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil, 28 Agosto. Available at: https://diplomatique.org.br/brics-expandido-e-agora-novos-desafios-para-a-politica-externa-brasileira/ (accessed 2 May 2024).

27.

Garcia

Rodriguez

Brito

, et al. (2023a) Chinese investments in Brazil: investment data, public policies for investment facilitation and the case of the Manaus Industrial Pole. BPC Policy Brief 13(6). Available at: https://bricspolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/BRICS_ChinaBrasil-7.pdf (accessed 2 May 2024).

28.

Garcia

Thompson

Rodriguez

, et al. (2023b) The political economy of South-South relations: a comparative analysis of China’s investments in Brazil and South Africa. BPC Policy Brief 13(8). Available at: https://bricspolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/BRICS_Comparative-3-1.pdf (accessed 2 May 2024).

29.

García-Herrero

Tan

(2020) Deglobalization in the context of United States-China decoupling. Policy Contribution 21: 1–16.

30.

Gomes

Esteves

(2018) The BRICS effect: impacts of South-South cooperation in the social field of international development cooperation. In: Gu

Kitano

(eds) Emerging Economies and the Changing Dynamics of Development Cooperation. Institute for Development Studies, 129–144.

31.

Kitano

(2018) Introduction: beyond aid – the future of development cooperation. In: Gu

Kitano

(eds) Emerging Economies and the Changing Dynamics of Development Cooperation. Institute for Development Studies, 89–108.

32.

Harvey

(2007) In what ways is ‘the new imperialism’ really new? Historical Materialism 15(3): 57–70.

33.

Harvey

(2018) Realities on the ground: David Harvey replies to John Smith. Review of African Political Economy 5. Available at: https://roape.net/2018/02/05/realities-ground-david-harvey-replies-john-smith/ (accessed 2 May 2024).

34.

Jaguaribe

(2018) Characteristics and directions of China’s global investment drive. In: Jaguaribe

(ed.) Directions of Chinese Global Investments. Brasília: FUNAG, Implications for Brazil, 17–50.

35.

Jenkins

(2019) How China Is Reshaping the Global Economy. Development Impacts in Africa and Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

36.

John Hopkins University (n.d.) China-Africa research initiative. Available at: http://www.sais-cari.org/chinese-investment-in-africa (accessed 30 October 2023).

37.

Kiely

(2015) The Brics, U.S. ‘Decline’ and Global Transformations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

38.

(2023) Trends, reasons and prospects of de-dollarization. South Centre. Available at: https://www.southcentre.int/trends-reasons-and-prospects-of-de-dollarization-august-2023/

39.

Lopes Afonso

Quinet

Salgueiro

(2021) Latin America and China: mutual benefit or dependency? CEPAL Review 2021(135): 147–162.

40.

Marshall

(2015) Behind the image of South-South solidarity in Brazil’s Vale. In: Bond

Garcia

(eds) BRICS, an Anti-Capitalist Critique. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jacana Media, 162–185.

41.

Martínez

(2014) La geopolítica petrolera China en Ecuador y el área andina. Tensões Mundiais 10(18): 255–273.

42.

Menezes

Bragatti

(2020) Dragon in the backyard: China’s investment and trade in Latin America in the context of crisis. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 40(3): 446–461.

43.

Mignolo

(2011) The global south and the world dis/order. Journal of Anthropological Research 67(2): 165–188.

44.

MMSEZ (2021) Media statement. MMSEZ final EIA application report submitted to the competent authority. Polokwane 2 February. Available at: https://mmsez.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/EIA-Media-Statement.pdf (accessed 30 October 2023).

45.

Naidu

(2015) South Africa and FOCAC: enabling a partnership for global economic governance beyond the BRICS? SAIIA Policy Insights 26: 1–12.

46.

New Development Bank (NDB) (2021a) Annual report 2021. Expand our reach and impact. Available at: https://www.ndb.int/annual-report-2021/pdf/NDB_AR_2021_complete.pdf (accessed 2 May 2024).

47.

New Development Bank (NDB) (2021b) General strategy for 2022-2026. Scaling up development finance for a sustainable future. Available at: https://www.ndb.int/about-ndb/general-strategy/#:~:text=NDB’s%20General%20Strategy%20for%202022,market%20economies%20and%20developing%20countries

48.

OEC (n.d.) China-South Africa. Available at: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/zaf (accessed 15 October 2023).

49.

Paul

(2023) The specter of deglobalization. Current History 122(840): 3–8.

50.

Ramos

Garcia

Pautasso

, et al. (2018) A decade of emergence: the BRICS institutional densification process. Journal of China and International Relations 6(1): 5–26.

51.

Roach

(2022) Deglobalization’s China wild card. The Project Syndicate, July 25. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-hit-hard-by-slowing-world-trade-by-stephen-s-roach-2022-07

52.

Rodríguez

Bazán Seminario

(2023) Authoritarian practices between ‘para-coloniality’ and ‘cheap security’: when Chinese state capital meets neoliberal copper mining (and protests) in Las Bambas, Peru. Globalizations. Epub ahead of print 19 April. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2023.2179813.

53.

Sanches

(2023) Como Brasil e China pretendem fechar negócios sem usar dólar americano. BBC News Brasil, 29 March. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c0wqqne0zk2o

54.

Saraiva

Silva

(2019) Ideologia e pragmatismo na política externa de Jair Bolsonaro. Relações Internacionais 64: 117–137.

55.

Sen

Leach

(2019) Introduction: the belt and road initiative and the sustainable development goals: opportunities and challenges. In: Sen

Leach

(eds) The Belt and Road Initiative and SDGs: Towards Equitable Sustainable Development. Institute for Development Studies. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/14898/IDSB50.4_10.190881968-2019.134.pdf?sequence=1016&isAllowed=y (accessed 2 May 2024).

56.

Seráfico

(2011) Globalização e empresariado: estudo sobre a Zona Franca de Manaus. São Paulo, Brazil: Annablume.

57.

Silva

(2013) Metamorfoses da Amazônia. 2ª ed. Manaus, Brazil: Editora Valer.

58.

Slipak

Ghiotto

(2019) América Latina en la Nueva Ruta de la Seda: El Rol de las Inversiones Chinas en la Región en un Contexto de Disputa (Inter)Hegemónica. Cuadernos Del CEL 4(7): 25–55.

59.

Soujun

Miranda

(2016) Enquadrando a cooperação energética sino-brasileira: perspectivas chinesas. Austral: Revista Brasileira de Estratégia e Relações Internacionais 5(10): 9–33.

60.

South African Government (n.d.). Special Economic Zone Act 16 of 2014. Available at: https://www.gov.za/documents/special-economic-zones-act (accessed 30 October 2023).

61.

Svampa

Slipak

(2015) China en América Latina: Del Consenso de los Commodities al Consenso de Beijing. Revista Ensambles 2(3): 34–63.

62.

The Dialogue (n.d.) China-Latin America finance database. Available at: https://www.thedialogue.org/map_list/ (accessed 30 October 2023).

63.

The State Council (2015) Full Text: Action Plan on the Belt and Road Initiative. Available at: https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/publications/2015/03/30/content_281475080249035.htm (accessed 2 May 2024).

64.

Thompson

(2019) Alternative South–South development collaboration? The role of China in the Coega special economic zone in South Africa. Public Administration and Development 39(4–5): 193–202.

65.

Thompson

(2020) Locating BRICS development strategies in global development policy narratives. In: Puppim de Oliveira

Jing

(eds) International Development Assistance and the BRICS: Governing China in the 21st Century. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 35–58.

66.

Thompson

Tsolekile de Wet

(2018) BRICS civil society initiatives: towards the inclusion of affected communities and collective development? Third World Thematics 3(6): 745–764.

67.

Thompson

Tsolekile

Wet

Shirinda

, et al. (2023) Chinese investment loans and foreign direct investment in South Africa 2012-2022. BPC Policy Brief 13(7). Available at: https://bricspolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/BRICS_ChinaAfricaSul.pdf (accessed 2 May 2024).

68.

Tooze

(2023) Three ways to read the ‘deglobalization’ debate. Financial Times, January, 30. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/b3f41263-88d9-4012-aafc-145f0327678f

69.

Trade Map (n.d.) Trade statistics for international business development. Available at: https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx (accessed 30 October 2023).

70.

UNCTAD (2019) World Investment Report: Special Economic Zones. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

71.

UNCTAD (2020) World Investment Report: International Production Beyond the Pandemic. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

72.

UNCTAD (2021) World Investment Report: Investing in Sustainable Recovery. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

73.

UNCTAD (2022) World Investment Report: International Tax Reforms and Sustainable Investment. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

74.

UNCTAD (2023) World Investment Report: Investing in Sustainable Energy for All. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

75.

Vadell

(2018) El Foro China-CELAC y el nuevo regionalismo para un mundo multipolar: desafíos para la Cooperación Sur-Sur. Carta Internacional 13(1): 6–37.

76.

Valle

(2007) Globalização e reestruturação produtiva: um estudo sobre a produção offshore em Manaus. Manaus, Brazil: Editora da Universidade Federal do Amazonas.

77.

Van der Pijl

(2017) BRICS – an involuntary contender bloc under attack. Estudos Internacionais 5(1): 25–46.

78.

Weinland

(2022) The tech war between America and China is just getting started. The Economist, November 18. Available at: https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2022/11/18/the-tech-war-between-america-and-china-is-just-getting-started

79.

Wilkinson

Escher

Garcia

(2022) The Brazil-China nexus in agrofood what is at stake in the future of the animal protein sector? International Quarterly for Asian Studies 53: 251–277.