This paper examines the impact of partisanship, rightwing media, and social media on attitudes about contemporary conspiracy theories. Mainstream scholarly views that ‘both sides’ of the political aisle indulge routinely in such theories are challenged. I adopt a Gramscian hegemonic framework that examines rising rightwing conspiracy theories as a manifestation of mass false consciousness in service of a political-economic system that serves upper-class interests. Issues examined include the QAnon movement, ‘big lie’ voter fraud conspiracism, and Covid-19 conspiracy theories, and the way they related to partisanship, rightwing media, and social media. I provide evidence that Republican partisanship, rightwing media consumption, and social media consumption are all significant statistical predictors of acceptance of modern conspiracy theories.
AllingtonDDuffyBWesselyS, et al. (2020) Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the Covid-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine51: 1763–1769.
BaleJM (2007) Political Paranoia v. political realism: on distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice41: 45–60.
BarkerD (2002) Rushed to Judgement: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
BarkunM (2003) A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
BartelsLM (2016) Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
BartelsLMHecloHHeroRE, et al. (2005) Inequality and American Governance. In: SkocpolTJacobsLR (eds) Inequality in American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.156–213.
14.
BaumerDCGoldHJ (2015) Parties, Polarization, and Democracy in the United States. New York: Routledge.
15.
BenklerYFarisRRobertsH (2018) Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
BernaysE (2004) Propaganda. New York: Ig Publishing.
CampbellAConversePEMillerWE, et al. (1980) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
CampbellJE (2018) Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
CareyJMNyhanBValentinoB, et al. (2016) An inflated view of the facts? How preferences and predispositions shape conspiracy beliefs about the deflate gate scandal. Research and Politics3: 1–9.
28.
CarnesN (2013) White Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
CassinoD (2016) Fox News and American Politics: How One Channel Shapes American Politics and Society. New York: Routledge.
30.
ChomskyN (1989) Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. Boston, MA: South End Press.
31.
CichockaAMarchlewskaMGolecdeZavalaA, et al. (2016) ‘They Will Not Control Us’: in-group positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology107: 556–576.
CinelliMMoralesGDFGaleazziA, et al. (2020) Echo chambers on social media: a comparative analysis. Physics and Society. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09603
34.
ClarkeRA (2004) Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror. New York: Free Press.
CrockerJLuhtanenRBroadnaxS, et al. (1999) Belief in U.S. Government conspiracies against blacks among Black and White college students: powerlessness or system blame?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25: 941–953.
DarwinHNeaveNHolmesJ (2011) Belief in conspiracy theories: the role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences50: 1289–1293.
DavisJWetherellGHenryPJ (2018) Social devaluation of African Americans and race-related conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology48: 999–1010.
43.
Del VicarioMBessi Al ZolloFPetroniF, et al. (2016) The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America113: 554–559.
DiMaggioA (2019) Slanting the news: media bias and its effects. In: NadlerABauerAJ (eds) News on the Right: Studying Conservative News Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.190–212.
46.
DiMaggioA (2021) Rising Fascism in America: It Can Happen Here. New York: Routledge.
DouglasKSuttonR (2011) Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology50: 544–552.
49.
DrochonH (2018) Who believes in conspiracy theories in Great Britain and Europe? In: UscinskiJE (ed.) Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.37–346.
50.
DyerKDHallRE (2019) Effect of critical thinking education on epistemically unwarranted beliefs in college students. Research in Higher Education60: 293–314.
FangJWeiWZhaoL, et al. (2014) Misinformation propagation in the age of Twitter. Computer47: 90–94.
53.
FedericoCWilliamsAVitriolJ (2018) The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology48: 927–938.
54.
FerraraEChangHChenE, et al. (2020) Characterizing social media manipulation in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. First Monday25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i11.11431
GilensM (2014) Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
GilensMPageB (2014) Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics12: 564–581.
60.
Golec de ZavalaAFedericoC (2018) Collective narcissism and the growth of conspiracy thinking over the course of the 2016 United States General election: a longitudinal analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology48: 1011–1018.
61.
GramsciAForgacsD (2000) The Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings 1916- 1935. New York: New York University Press.
GrosecloseTLevittSSnyderJ (1999) Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers: adjusted ADA scores for the U.S. Congress. American Political Science Review93: 33–50.
64.
GrossmannMHopkinsDA (2016) Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.
HackerJPiersonP (2005) Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
HackerJPiersonP (2011) Winner-take-all Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.
JamiesonKH (2018) Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President: What We Don’t, Can’t, and Do Know. New York: Oxford University Press.
80.
JamiesonKHCappellaJN (2008) Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
JolleyDDouglasK (2014) The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE9: e0089177
83.
JolleyDMeleadyRDouglasK (2020) Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology111: 17–35.
McCartyNPooleKTRosenthalH (2006) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93.
McCloskeyHChongD (1985) Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals. British Journal of Political Science15: 329–363.
94.
McIntyreL (2018) Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95.
MartinGJYurukogluA (2017) Bias in cable news: persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review107: 2565–2599.
96.
MashuriAZaduqistiE (2015) The effect of intergroup threat and social identity salience on the belief in conspiracy theories over terrorism in Indonesia: collective angst as a mediator. International Journal of Psychological Research8: 24–35.
PennycookGRandD (2019) Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116: 2521–2526.
RohdeDW (1991) Partis and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
111.
RomerDJamiesonKH (2021) Patterns of media use, strength of belief in covid-19 conspiracy theories, and the prevention of covid-19 from march to July 2020 in the United States: survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research23: e25215. Available at: https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25215/
SmallpageSMEndersAMUscinskiJE (2017) The partisan contours of conspiracy theory beliefs. Research & Politics4: 1–7.
119.
SoralWCichockaABilewiczM, et al. (2018) The collective conspiracy mentality in Poland. In: UscinskiJE (ed.) Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.372–384.
120.
StahlTVan ProoijenJ-W (2018) Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences122: 155–163.
121.
SullivanDLandauMJRothschildZK (2010) An existential function of enemyship: evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98: 434–449.
122.
SunsteinC (2007) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
123.
SwamiVVoracekMStiegerS, et al. (2014) Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition133: 572–585.
UscinskiJEParentJM (2014) American Conspiracy Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.
128.
UscinskiJEKlofstadCAtkinsonM (2016) Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Science Quarterly69: 57–71.
