Dominant ideologies about poverty in the USA draw on personal responsibility and beliefs that a ‘culture of poverty’ creates and reproduces inequality. As the primary recipients of welfare are single mothers, discourses surrounding welfare are also influenced by dominant ideologies about mothering, namely intensive mothering. Yet, given the centrality of resources to intensive mothering, mothers on welfare are often precluded from enacting this type of parenting. In this paper, I conduct a critical discourse analysis of 69 interviews with Ohio Works First (USA) program managers to examine how welfare program managers talk about and evaluate their clients’ mothering. My findings suggest three themes regarding expectations and evaluations of clients’ mothering: (a) enacting child-centered mothering, (b) breaking out of the ‘culture of poverty’ and (c) (mis)managing childcare.
AckerJ (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4(2): 139–58.
2.
ArendellT (1999) Hegemonic motherhood: Deviancy discourses and employed mothers’ accounts of out-of-school time issues. Center for Working Families Working Paper9.
3.
BengstonVLBiblarzTJRobertsRE (2002) How Families Still Matter: A Longitudinal Study of Two Generations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BlochKTaylorT (2014) ‘Welfare queens’ and ‘anchor babies’: An intersectional analysis of race, gender, class, nationality and motherhood. In: GilesMV (ed.) Mothering in the Age of Neoliberalism. Toronto: Demeter Press, 199–210.
5.
BuzzanellPMWaymerDTagleMPet al. (2007) Different transitions into working motherhood: Discourses of Asian, Hispanic, and African American women. Journal of Family Communication7(3): 195–220.
6.
CharlesM (2008) Culture and inequality: Identity, ideology, and difference in ‘postascriptive society’. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science619(1): 41–58.
7.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
CollinsPH (2006) From Black Power to Hip Hop: Racism, Nationalism, and Feminism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
9.
CrittendenA (2001) The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World Is Still the Least Valued. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
10.
DomhoffWG (2010) Who Rules America? Challenges to Corporate and Class Dominance, 6th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
11.
EdinKKefalasM (2005) Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood before Marriage. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
12.
EdinKLeinL (1996) Work, welfare, and single mothers: Economic survival strategies. American Sociological Review62(2): 253–66.
13.
FaircloughNL (1985) Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics9(6): 739–763.
14.
FaircloughNL (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
15.
FergusonKE (1984) The Feminist Case against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
16.
FischerCSHoutMJankowskiMSet al. (2008 [1996]) Inequality by design. In: GruskyDB (ed.) Social Stratification: Race, Class, Gender in Sociological Perspective, 3rd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 49–52.
17.
GareyAI (1999) Weaving Working and Motherhood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18.
GrossCTurgeonBTaylorTet al. (2014) State intervention in intensive mothering in the United States: Neoliberalism, new paternalism, and poor mothers in Ohio. In: EnnisL (ed.) Intensive Mothering: The Cultural Contradictions of Modern Motherhood. Toronto: Demeter Press, 163–180.
19.
HandlerJF (2003) Social citizenship and workfare in the US and Western Europe: From status to contract. Journal of European Social Policy13(3): 229–243.
20.
HarveyDLReedMH (1996) The culture of poverty: An ideological analysis. Sociological Perspectives39(4): 465–495.
21.
HaysS (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
HaysS (2003) Flat Broke with Children. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
JohnsonJL (2014) The best I can: Hope for single parents in the age of intensive mothering. In: EnnisL (ed.) Intensive Mothering: The Cultural Contradictions of Modern Motherhood. Toronto: Demeter Press, 267–279.
24.
JohnstonDDSwansonDH (2003) Invisible mothers: A content analysis of motherhood ideologies and myths in magazines. Sex Roles49(1–2): 21–33.
25.
KennellyI (1999) ‘That single mother element’: How white employers typify black women. Gender & Society13(2): 168–192.
26.
KohnM (1969) Class and Conformity. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
27.
KrinskyJ (1998) Work, workfare, and contention in New York City: The potential of flexible identities in organizing opposition to workfare. Critical Sociology24(3): 277–305.
28.
Ladd-TaylorM (2004) Mother worship/mother-blame: Politics and welfare in an uncertain age. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering6(1): 7–15.
29.
LareauA (2003) Unequal Childhoods: Class Race, and Family Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1993) American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
McCormakK (2004) Resisting the welfare mother: The power of welfare discourse and tactics of resistance. Critical Sociology30(2): 355–383.
32.
MisraJMollerSKaridesM (2003) Envisioning dependency: Changing media depictions of welfare in the 20th century. Social Problems50(4): 482–504.
33.
MoynihanDP (1965) The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, Office of Policy Planning and Research.
34.
NelsonMK (2005) The Social Economy of Single Motherhood: Raising Children in Rural America. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
NeubeckKJCazenaveNA (2001) Welfare Racism: Playing the Race Card against America’s Poor. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
PioreMJ (2008 [1970]) The dual labor market: Theory and implications. In: GruskyDB (ed.) Social Stratification: Race, Class, Gender in Sociological Perspective, 3rd edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 550–553.
37.
Risley-CurtissCHeffernanK (2003) Gender biases in child welfare. Affilia18(4): 395–410.
38.
RyanW (1976) Blaming the Victim (revised edition). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
39.
SmeedingTM (2008) Poverty, work, and policy: The United States in comparative perspective. In: GruskyDB (ed.) Social Stratification: Race, Class, Gender in Sociological Perspective, 3rd edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 327–337.
40.
SossJFordingRCSchramSF (2011) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
SossJSchramSFVartanianTPet al. (2001) Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science45(2): 378–395.
42.
SwiftKJ (1995) Manufacturing ‘Bad Mothers’: A Critical Perspective on Child Neglect. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
43.
TaylorT (2011) Re-examining cultural contradictions: Mothering ideology and the intersections of class, gender, and race. Sociology Compass5(10): 898–907.
44.
TurgeonBTaylorTNiehausL (2014) Contrasts and classtalk: A critical discourse analysis of welfare-to-work program managers. Discourse & Society25(5): 1–16.
45.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012) The recession of 2007–2009. BLS Spotlight on Statistics. Available (consulted 25September2013) at: http://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2012/recession
