This article examines how neighborhood disadvantage affects neighborhood collective action. Neither the urban poverty literature nor the collective action literature has adequately examined how poverty would affect neighborhood level collective action on their own. I seek to bridge these two literatures to examine how collective action operates in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Though the existing literature would argue that increased social disorganization due to depopulation, social isolation, and hyper-segregation would result in decreased collective action, I argue that other neighborhood characteristics may offset the lack of ‘resources’ and ‘organization’ available to disadvantaged communities. I use the Chicago Tribune from 1970 to 1990 to create a data set of neighborhood-level protest events. Using random effects negative binomial regression, I show that while disadvantage does indeed negatively impact mobilization, factors such as the racial composition of the neighborhood, organizational density, and prior mobilization rates can offset the impact of increasing neighborhood disadvantage.
AllisonPD (1996) Fixed effects partial likelihoods for repeated events. Sociological Methods and Research25: 207–222.
2.
AllisonPD (2005) Fixed Effect Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3.
AllisonPDChristakisN (2006) Fixed effects methods for the analysis of non-repeated events. Sociology Methodology36(1): 155–172.
4.
AminzadeRRGoldstoneJAMcAdamD. (2001) Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AndrewsK (2001) Social movements and policy implementation: the Mississippi civil rights movement and the war on poverty, 1965-1971. American Sociological Review66: 71–95.
6.
BeyerleinKHippJR (2005) Social capital, too much of a good thing? American religious traditions and community crime. Social Forces84: 992–2009.
7.
BeyerleinKHippJR (2006) From pews to participation: the effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems53: 97–117.
8.
BursteinP (1999) Social movements and public policy. In: GiugniMMcAdamDTillyC (eds) How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: Universtiy of Minnesota Press, 3–21.
9.
BursteinPLintonA (2002) The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy. Social Forces81: 380–408.
10.
CastellsM (1981) Crisis urbana y cambio social. Madrid-Mexico: Siglo XXI.
11.
CostainA (1994) Linking citizens to government: Interest group politics at common cause. American Journal of Sociology99(4): 1105–1106.
12.
CressDMSnowDA (1996) Mobilization at the margins: Resources, benefactors, and the viability of homeless social movement organizations. American Sociological Review61(6): 1089–1109.
13.
CunninghamDPhillipsBT (2007) Contexts for mobilization: spatial settings and Klan presence in North Carolina. American Journal of Sociology113(3): 781–814.
14.
DavenportC (2009) The Rashomon Effect: Contentious Politics, Data Generation and the Importance of Perspective in Black Panther Repression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DrakeSCClaytonHR (1993) Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in a Northern City (revised and enlarged). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
EarlJSouleSAMcCarthyJD (2003) Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. American Sociological Review68(4): 581–606.
17.
FainsteinSFainsteinN (1989) The racial dimension in urban political economy. Urban Affairs Review25(2): 187–199.
18.
FernandezRMMcAdamD (1988) Social networks and social movements: Multiorganizational fields and recruitment to Mississippi freedom summer. Sociological Forum3(3): 357–382.
19.
GamsonWA (1968) Stable unrepresentation. American Society12(2): 15–20.
20.
GamsonWA (1975) The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
21.
GamsonWAMeyerD (1996) Framing political opportunity. In: McAdamDMcCarthyJDZaldM (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Organizational Infrastructures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 275–90.
22.
GothamKF (1999) Political opportunity, community identity, and the emergence of a local anti-expressway movement. Social Problems46(3): 332–354.
23.
GothamKBrumleyK (2002) Using space: agency and identity in a public housing development. City and Community1(3): 267–289.
24.
GouldRV (1991) Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris commune, 1871. American Sociological Review56(6): 716–729.
25.
GouldRV (1993) Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review58(2): 182–196.
26.
GouldRV (1995) Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
GrahamLHoganR (1990) Social class and tactics: Neighborhood opposition to group homes. The Sociological Quarterly31(4): 513–529.
28.
HalabyCN (2004) Panel models in sociological research: theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology30: 507–544.
29.
JargowskyPA (1997) Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation Press.
30.
JencksCMayerS (1990) The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In: LaurenceLMcGearyM (eds) Inner-city Poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 111–186.
31.
JenkinsJC (1983) Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology9: 527–553.
32.
JenkinsJCEckertCM (1986) Channeling black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the black movement. American Sociological Review51(6): 812–829.
33.
JenkinsJCPerrowC (1977) Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review42(2): 249–268.
34.
KriesiH (1995) The political opportunity structure of new social movements: Its impact on their mobilization. In: JenkinsJCKlandermansB (eds) The Politics of Social Protest. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 167–198.
35.
KriesiH (1996) The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. In: McAdamDZaldMMcCarthyJ (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152–184.
36.
KubrinCEWeitzerR (2003) New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency40(4): 374–402.
37.
LangK (1966) Collective Dynamics. New York, NY: Crowell.
38.
Le BonG (1960) The Crowd. New York, NY: Viking Press.
39.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
McAdamD (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
McAdamD (1983) Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. American Sociological Review48(6): 735–754.
42.
McAdamD (1986) Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology92(1): 64–90.
43.
McAdamD (1988) Freedom Summer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
McAdamD (1989) The biographical consequences of activism. American Sociological Review54(5): 744–760.
45.
McAdamD (1992) Gender as a mediator of the activist experience: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1211–1240.
46.
McAdamD (1996a) Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In: McAdamDZaldMMcCarthyJ (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–40.
47.
McAdamD (1996b) Movement strategy and dramaturgic framing in democratic states: The case of the American Civil Rights Movement. Research on Democracy and Society3: 155–176.
48.
McAdamDFernandezRM (1990) Microstructural bases of recruitment to social movements. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change12: 1–33.
49.
McAdamDPaulsenR (1993) Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of Sociology99(3): 640–667.
50.
McAdamDSuY (2002) The war at home: Antiwar protests and Congressional voting, 1965 to 1973. American Sociological Review67(5): 696–721.
51.
McAdamDMcCarthyJDZaldMN (eds) (1996a) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
McAdamDMcCarthyJDZaldMN (eds) (1996b) Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes – toward a synthetic. In: Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.
53.
McAdamDSampsonRJWefferSEMacindoeH (2005) ‘There will be fighting in the streets’: The distorting lens of social movement theory. Mobilization: An International Journal10(1): 1–18.
54.
McCammonHJCampbellKEGranberEM. (2001) How movements win: gendered opportunity structures and the state women’s suffrage movements, 1866–1919. American Sociological Review66: 49.
55.
McCarthyJD (1973) The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
56.
McCarthyJDWolfsonM (1996) Resource mobilization by local social movement organizations: Agency, strategy, and organization in the movement against drinking and driving. American Sociological Review61(6): 1070–1088.
57.
McCarthyJDZaldMN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology82(6): 1212–1241.
58.
McCarthyJDMcPhailCSmithJ (1996) Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review61(3): 478–499.
59.
McRobertsO (2003) Streets of Glory: Church and Community in a Black Urban Neighborhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MartinDGMillerB (2003) Space and contentious politics. Mobilization: An International Journal8(2): 143–156.
62.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1993) American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
63.
MeyerDSMinkoffDC (2004) Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces82(4): 1457–1492.
64.
MeyerDSStaggenborgS (1996) Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology101(6): 1628–1260.
65.
MeyerDSStaggenborgS (1998) Countermovement dynamics in federal systems: A comparison of abortion politics in Canada and the United States. Research in Political Sociology8: 209–240.
66.
MinkoffDC (1995) Organizing for Equality: The Evolution of Women’s and Racial-Ethnic Organizations in America, 1955–1985. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
67.
MinkoffDC (1997) The sequencing of social movements. American Sociological Review62(5): 779–799.
68.
MinkoffDC (1998a) Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Sociological Inquiry68(1): 139–142.
69.
MinkoffDC (1998b) Money for change: Social movement philanthropy at Haymarket people’s fund. Mobilization3(1): 136–138.
70.
MinkoffDC (1998c) The structure of women’s nonprofit organizations. Contemporary Sociology27(6): 601–602.
71.
MinkoffDC (1999) Movement genesis: Social movement theory and the West German peace movement. Social Forces78(2): 840–841.
72.
MinkoffDC (1999) Bending with the wind: Strategic change and adaptation by women’s and racial minority organizations. American Journal of Sociology104(6): 1666–1703.
73.
MorrisAD (1984) The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.
74.
MouwT (2000) Job relocation and the racial gap in unemployment in Detroit and Chicago, 1980 to 1990. American Sociological Review65(5): 730–753.
75.
MyersDJCanigliaBS (2004) All the rioting that’s fit to print: Selection effects in national newspaper coverage of civil disorders, 1968–1969. American Sociological Review69(4): 519–543.
76.
OliverPEManeyGM (2000) Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology106(2): 463–505.
77.
OliverPEMyersDJ (1999) How events enter the public sphere: Conflict, location and sponsorship in local newspaper coverage of public events. American Journal of Sociology105(1): 38–87.
78.
OlzakS (1992) The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Palo Alto, CA:Stanford University Press.
79.
OlzakSShanahanSWestE (1994) School desegregation, interracial exposure, and antibusing activity in contemporary urban America. American Journal of Sociology100: 196–214.
80.
OstermanP (1991) Welfare participation in a full employment economy: The impact of neighborhood. Social Problems38(4): 475–491.
81.
PattilloME (1998) Sweet mothers and gangbangers: Managing crime in a black middle-class neighborhood. Social Forces76(3): 747–774.
82.
PivenFFClowardR (1979) Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
83.
RhombergC (2004) No There There: Race, Class, and Political Community in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
84.
RivlinG (1992) Fire on the Prairie: Chicago’s Harold Washington and the Politics of Race. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
85.
RuppLJ (1987) Survival in the Doldrums: The American Women’s Rights Movement, 1945 to the 1960s. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
86.
SampsonRJ (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
87.
SampsonRJMacIndoeHMcAdamD. (2005) Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civic action. American Journal of Sociology111(3): 673–714.
88.
SampsonRJWilsonWJ (1995) Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In: HaganJTertersonRD (eds) Crime and Inequality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 37–56.
89.
SharkeyP (2013) Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress Toward Racial Equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
90.
SmallMLMcDermottM (2006) The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces84(3): 1697–1724.
91.
SmelserNJ (1971) Theory of Collective Behavior. New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.
92.
SmithJMcCarthyJDMcPhailC (2001) From protest to agenda building: Description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C. Social Forces79(4): 1397–1423.
93.
SouleSAMcAdamDMcCarthyJD. (1999) Protest events: Cause or consequence of state action? The U.S. women’s movement and federal congressional activities, 1956–1979. Mobilization4(2): 239–255.
94.
SouleSAOlzakS (2004) When do movements matter? The politics of contingency and the equal rights amendment. American Sociological Review69: 473–497.
95.
StaggenborgS (1989) Organizational and environmental influences on the development of the pro-choice movement. Social Forces68(1): 204–240.
96.
StoeckerR (1995) Community, movement, organization: The problem of identity convergence in collective action. The Sociological Quarterly36(1): 111–130.
97.
SusserI (1996) The construction of poverty and homelessness in US cities. Annual Review of Anthropology25: 411–435.
98.
TarrowSG (1989) Struggle, Politics, and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements and Cycles of Protest. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Center for International Studies.
99.
TarrowSG (1998) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100.
TaylorV (1996) Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Contemporary Sociology2(4): 485–487.
101.
TaylorVVan WilligenM (1996) Women’s self-help and the reconstruction of gender: The postpartum support and breast cancer movements. Mobilization1(2): 123–142.
102.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Press.
103.
TillyC (1995) To explain political processes. American Journal of Sociology100: 1594–1610
104.
TillyC (2000) Spaces of contention. Mobilization5(2): 135–159.
105.
TillyC (2003) Contention over space and place. Mobilization: An International Journal8(2): 221–225.
106.
UhrigNVan DykeNGreeneKR (1996) Dynamics of collectie protest in the US, 1960–1980. Manual for microfilm copying and event coding (coding manual). Stanford CA:Department of Sociology, Stanford University. Unpublished.
107.
US Department of Labor, Office of Policy Planning and Research (1965) The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
108.
Van DykeN (2003) Crossing movement boundaries: factors that facilitate coalition protest by American college Students, 1930–1990. Social Problems50(2): 226–250.
109.
Van DykeNSouleSA (2002) Structural social change and the mobilizing effect of threat: Explaining levels of patriot and militia mobilizing in the United States. Social Problems49(4): 497–520.
110.
VenkateshSA (2000) American Project: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
111.
WalshE (1981) Resource mobilization and citizen protest in communities around three mile island. Social Problems29(1): 1–21.
112.
WilsonWJ (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
113.
WilsonWJ (1996) When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York, NY: Knopf.
