We argue that the relative persistence of racial segregation is due, at least in part, to the process of residential search and the perceptions upon which those searches are based—a critical but often-ignored component of the residential sorting process. We examine where Chicago-area residents would “seriously consider” and “never consider” living, finding that community attraction and avoidance are highly racialized. Race most clearly shapes the residential perceptions and preferences of whites, and matters the least to blacks. Latinos would seriously consider moving to numerous neighborhoods, but controls for demographics and distance from the respondents’ home make Latino preferences much like those of whites. Critically, the geography of existing segregation begets further segregation: distance from current community significantly affects perceptions of the communities into which respondents might move. While neighborhood perception may cause persistent segregation, it may also offer hope for integration with appropriate policy interventions.
AlbaRichard D.LoganJohn R.1993. Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: an individual-level analysis of segregation. American Journal of Sociology98 (6): 1388–427.
2.
American Association of Public Opinion Researchers (AAPOR). 2008. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 5th ed. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.
3.
BoboLawrence D.1989. Keeping the linchpin in place: Testing the multiple sources of opposition to residential integration. International Review of Social Psychology2 (3): 305–23.
4.
BrownLawrence A.MooreEric G.1970. The intra-urban migration process: A perspective. Geografiska Analer. Series B, Human Geography52 (1): 1–13.
5.
CharlesCamille Zubrinsky. 2000. Residential segregation in Los Angeles. In Prismatic metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles, eds. BoboLawrence D.OliverMelvin L.JohnsonJames H.Jr.ValenzuelaAbelJr., 167–219. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
CharlesCamille Zubrinsky. 2003. The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology29:167–207.
7.
ClarkWilliam A. V.2009. Changing residential preferences across income, education, and age: Findings from the multi-city study of urban inequality. Urban Affairs Review44 (3): 334–55.
8.
ClarkWilliam A.V.SmithT. R.1979. Modelling information use in a spatial context. Annals of the Association of American Geographers69:575–88.
9.
CrowderKyle D. 2001. Racial stratification in the actuation of mobility expectations: Micro-level impacts of racially restrictive housing markets. Social Forces79 (4): 1377–96.
10.
DaleyRichard M.2010. Introduction. In Explore Chicago: Eat, play, love our neighborhoods. Chicago, IL: Chicago Department of Tourism.
11.
EmersonMichael O.ChaiKaren J.YanceyGeorge. 2001. Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans. American Sociological Review66 (6): 922–35.
12.
GoeringJohn M.FeinsJudith D.2003. Choosing a better life? Evaluating the moving to opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
13.
GoyetteKimberly A.FarrieDanielleFreelyJoshua. 2012. This school’s gone downhill: Racial change and perceived school quality among whites. Social Problems59:155–76.
14.
HarrisDavid R.1999. “Property values drop when blacks move in, because…”: Racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighborhood desirability. American Sociological Review64 (3): 461–79.
15.
HarrisDavid R.2001. Why are white and blacks averse to black neighbors?Social Science Research30 (1): 100–16.
16.
HuffJames O.1982. Spatial aspects of residential search. In Modelling housing market search, ed. ClarkWilliam A. V., 106–29. London: Croom Helm.
17.
IcelandJohnWilkesRima. 2006. Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class, and residential segregation. Social Problems53 (2): 248–73.
18.
ImmergluckDaniel.2002. Redlining redux: Black neighborhoods, black-owned firms, and the regulatory cold shoulder. Urban Affairs Review38:22–41.
19.
IyengarSheena S.LepperMark R.2000. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79 (6): 995–1006.
20.
KrysanMaria.2002. Community undesirability in black and white: Examining racial residential preferences through community perceptions. Social Problems49 (4): 521–43.
21.
KrysanMariaBaderMichael D. M.2007. Perceiving the metropolis: Seeing the city through a prism of race. Social Forces86 (2): 699–733.
22.
KrysanMariaBaderMichael D. M.2009. Racial blind spots: Black-white-Latino differences in community knowledge. Social Problems56 (4): 677–701.
23.
KrysanMariaCrowderKyleBaderMichael D. M.2014. Pathways to residential segregation. In Choosing homes, choosing schools, eds. LareauAnnetteGoyetteKimberly A., 27–63. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
KrysanMariaCouperMick P.FarleyReynoldsFormanTyrone. 2009. Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment. American Journal of Sociology115 (2): 527–59.
25.
LewisValerie A.EmersonMichael O.KlinebergStephen. 2011. Residential segregation and neighborhood racial composition preferences of whites, blacks, and Latinos. Social Forces89 (4): 1386–407.
26.
LoganJohnOakleyDeirdreStowellJacob. 2008. School segregation in metropolitan regions, 1970–2000: The impacts of policy choices on public education. American Journal of Sociology113 (6): 1611–44.
27.
LoganJohn R.StultsBrian. 2011. The persistence of segregation in the metropolis: New findings from the 2010 census. Census Brief prepared for Project US2010. Available from http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010.
28.
MacLennanDuncan. 1982. Housing economics: An applied approach. New York, NY: Longman.
29.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
PattersonOrlando.1997. The ordeal of integration: Progress and resentment in America’s “racial” crisis. New York, NY: Civitas/Counterpoint.
31.
PattilloMaryDelale-O’ConnorLoriButtsFelicia. 2014. High stakes choosing. In Choosing homes, choosing schools, eds. LareauAnnetteGoyetteKimberly A., 237–67. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
QuillianLincoln. 2002. Why is black-white residential segregation so persistent? Evidence on three theories from migration data. Social Science Research31:197–229.
33.
QuillianLincoln. 2015. A comparison of traditional and discrete-choice approaches to the analysis of residential mobility and locational attainment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
34.
QuillianLincolnPagerDevah. 2001. Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. The American Journal of Sociology107:717–67.
35.
RoscignoVincent J.KarafinDiana L.TesterGriff. 2009. The complexities and processes of racial housing discrimination. Social Problems56 (1): 49–69.
36.
RossStephen L.TurnerMargery Austin. 2005. Housing discrimination in metropolitan America: Explaining changes between 1989 and 2000. Social Problems52 (2): 152–80.
37.
SampsonRobert J.RaudenbushStephen W.2004. Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”Social Psychology Quarterly67:319–42.
38.
SampsonRobert J.SharkeyPatrick. 2008. Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality. Demography45 (1): 1–29.
39.
SchwartzBarry.2000. Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist55 (1): 79–88.
40.
SemyonovMosheKrausVered. 1982. The social hierarchies of communities and neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly63 (4): 780–89.
41.
SharkeyPatrick. 2013. Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
SmallMarioMcDermottMonica. 2006. The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces84:1697–1724.
43.
SouthScott J.CrowderKyle D.1998. Leaving the ’hood: Residential mobility between black, white, and integrated neighborhoods. American Sociological Review63 (1): 17–26.
44.
SquiresGregory D.2007. Demobilization of the individualistic bias: Housing market discrimination as a contributor to labor market and economic inequality. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science609 (1): 200–14.
45.
ThernstromStephanThernstromAbigail. 1997. America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
