Sociological methods have consistently succeeded while econometric methods have failed in research on capital punishment and homicide. But econometricians aggressively promote their findings in public policy venues, while sociologists are less assertive. This is due to cultural differences between the disciplines, and to a philosophy of science that values falsification of hypotheses over progress in answering research questions. This problem has occurred and is likely to reoccur in other policy areas where sociologists are insufficiently assertive in defending their accomplishments.
Abbott, A. (2004) Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. Norton: New York
2.
Abbot, E. (1884) Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. URL (consulted 29 January 2004): http://www.alcyone.com/max/lit/flatland
3.
Archer, D. and Gartner, R. (1984) Homicide and the Death Penalty: A Cross-National Test of a Deterrence Hypothesis. D. Archer and R. Gartner (eds) Violence and Crime in Cross-National Perspective, pp. 118—39. Yale University Press: New Haven.
4.
Bailey, W. and Peterson, R. (1997) Murder, Capital Punishment, and Deterrence: A Review of the Literature. H. Bedau (ed.) The Death Penalty In America: Current Controversies, pp 135—75. Oxford University Press: New York.
5.
Baruya, A. (1997) A Review of Speed-Accident Relationship for European Roads, Working Paper R1.1.1, Transport Research Laboratory, Berkshire, United Kingdom. URL (consulted 5 May 2004): http://www.vtt.fi/rte/projects/yki6/master/rep111.pdf
6.
Berk, R. (2004a) Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
7.
Berk, R. (2004b) New Claims about Executions and General Deterrence: Deja Vu All Over Again? URL (consulted 19 October 2004): http://www.preprints.stat.ucla.edu/396/JELS.pap.pdf
8.
Black, D. and Nagin, D. (1998) Do Right-to-Carry Laws Deter Violent Crime?Journal of Legal Studies27(1): 209—19.
9.
Blumstein, A. (2000) Disaggregating the Violence Trends. A. Blumstein and J. Wallman (eds) The Crime Drop in America, pp.13—44. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
10.
Boldt, D. (1999) Study Evidence on Guns. Philadelphia Inquirer 14 December 1999. URL (consulted 17 May 2000): http://www.phillynews.com.
11.
Bonner, R. and Fessenden, F. (2000) States with no Death Penalty Share Lower Homicide Rates. New York Times 22 September 2000. URL (consulted 20 January 2004): http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/22/national/22DEAT.html
12.
Bowen, W. and Bok, D. (1998) The Shape of the River. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
13.
Bowers, W. and Pierce, G. (1975) The Illusion of Deterrence in Isaac Ehrlich's Work on Capital Punishment. Yale Law Journal85(2): 187—208.
14.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002 and other years) Capital Punishment. URL (consulted 13 January 2004): http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cp.htm#publications
15.
Cameron, S. (1994) A Review of the Econometric Evidence on the Effects of Capital Punishment. Journal of Socio-Economics23(1/2): 197—214.
16.
Cloninger, D. (1977) Deterrence and the Death Penalty: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Journal of Behavioral Economics6(1): 87—107.
17.
Cloninger, D. and Marchesini, R. (2001) Execution and Deterrence: A Quasi-Controlled Group Experiment. Applied Economics33(5): 569—76.
18.
Cole, S. (ed.) (2001) What's Wrong with Sociology?Transaction: New Brunswick.
19.
Conley, D. (2004) The Pecking Order: Which Siblings Succeed and Why . Pantheon: New York.
20.
Davis, J. (2001) What's Wrong with Sociology? S. Cole (ed.) What's Wrong with Sociology? pp. 179—97. Transaction: New Brunswick .
21.
De Leeuw, J. (1994) Statistics and the Sciences. I. Borg and P. Mohler (eds) Trends and Perspectives in Empirical Social Research , pp. 139—48. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin.
22.
Dezhbaksh, H., Robin, P. and Shepherd, J. (2002) Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Post-Moratorium Panel Data. American Law and Economics Review5(2): 344—76.
23.
Donohue, J. and Levitt, S. (2001) The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime. Quarterly Journal of Economics116(2): 379—420.
24.
Ehrlich, I. (1975) The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death. American Economic Review65(3): 397—417.
25.
Fessenden, F. (2000) Deadly Statistics: A Survey of Crime and Punishment . The New York Times 22 September 2000. URL (consulted 20 January 2004): http://www.nytimes.com
26.
Freedman, D. (1991) Statistical models and shoe leather. Sociological Methodology21: 291—313.
27.
Freedman, D. (2003) Structural Equation Models: A Critical Review. Technical Report No. 651, Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley. URL (consulted 27 January 2004): http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~census/651.pdf
28.
Freeman, D. (1997) Margaret Mead and the Heretic. Penguin: New York.
29.
Glymour, C. (1997) Social Statistics and Genuine Inquiry: Reflections on The Bell Curve. B. Devlin (ed.) Intelligence, Genes and Success: Scientists Respond to The Bell Curve, pp. 257—80. Springer: New York.
30.
Goertzel, T. (2002) Myths of Murder and Multiple Regression. Skeptical Inquirer26(1): 19—23.
31.
Goertzel, T. (2004) Capital Punishment and Homicide: Sociological Realities and Econometric Illusions. Skeptical Inquirer28(4) 23—7.
32.
Hatch, O. (2002) Minority views, appended to the Report of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate on The Innocence Protection Act of 2002, 107th Congress, Second Session, Report 107—315, Calendar No 731. URL (consulted 12 January 2004): http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_reports&docid=f:sr315.107.pdf
33.
Herrnstein, R. and Murray, C. (1994) The Bell Curve. Free Press: New York.
34.
Hoenack, S. and Weiler, W. (1980) A Structural Model of Murder Behavior and the Criminal Justice System. American Economic Review70(3): 327—41.
35.
Joyce, T. (2001) Did Legalized Abortion Lower Crime? URL (consulted 27 January 2004): http://www.morningafterpill.org/stopp/joyce.pdf
36.
Kuhn, T. (1996 [1962]) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
37.
Lakatos, I. (1978) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs . Cambridge University Press:Cambridge .
38.
Lamperti, J. (n.d.) Does Capital Punishment Deter Murder? URL (consulted 17 May 2004) http://www.dartmouth.edu/~chance/teaching_aids/books_articles/JLpaper.pdf
39.
Leamer, E. (1983) Let's Take the Con out of Econometrics. American Econometrics Review73(1): 31—43.
40.
Lieberson, S. (1985) Making it Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. University of California Press: Berkeley.
41.
Lott, J. and Mustard, D. (1997) Crime, Deterrence and the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns. Journal of Legal Studies26(1): 1—68.
42.
Lott, J. and Whitley, J. (2001) Abortion and Crime: Unwanted Children and Out-of-Wedlock Births. Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 254. URL (consulted 27 January 2004): http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=270126
43.
McClendon, M. (2002) Multiple Regression and Causal Analysis. Waveland Press: Prospect Heights.
44.
McKim, V. and Turner, S. (1997) Causality in Crisis?: Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. University of Notre Dame Press: Notre Dame.
45.
McManus, W. (1985) Estimates of the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: The Importance of the Researcher's Prior Beliefs. Journal of Political Economy93(2): 417—25.
46.
Manski, C. (1978) Prospects for Inference on Deterrence through Empirical Analysis of Individual Criminal Behavior. A. Blumstein (ed.) Deterrence and Incapacitation, pp. 400—424. National Academy of Sciences: Washington.
47.
Marvell, T. and Moody, C. (1997) The Impact of Prison Growth on Homicide. Homicide Studies1(3): 205—33.
48.
Mayer, T. (1980) Economics as a Hard Science: Realistic goal or Wishful Thinking?Economic Inquiry18(2): 165—78.
49.
Mead, M. (1988) Coming of Age in Samoa. Quill : New York.
50.
Mocan, N. and Gittings, K. (2001) Pardons, Executions and Homicide. Working Paper 8639, National Bureau of Economic Research. URL (consulted 12 January 2004): http://www.nber.org/papers/w8639
51.
Passell, P. and Taylor, J.B. (1977) The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Another View. American Economic Review67(3): 445—51.
52.
Pinatel, J. (1968) Thorsten Sellin and the Principal Trends in Modern Criminology. M. Wolfgang (ed.) Crime and Culture: Essays in Honor of Thorsten Sellin, pp. 3—9. Wiley: New York.
53.
Popper, K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books: New York.
54.
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster : New York.
55.
Sellin, T. (1959) The Death Penalty. American Law Institute: Philadelphia.
56.
Shepherd, J. (2004) Capital Punishment and the Deterrence of Crime. Written Testimony for the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, Hearing on H.R. 2934, the Terrorist Penalties Enhancement Act of 2003. URL (consulted 12 October 2004): http://www.house.gov/judiciary/shepherd042104.pdf
57.
Toccafundi, D. (1996) The Sellin Collection at Penn. URL (consulted 24 January 2004): http://www.library.upenn.edu/exhibits/pennhistory/library/sellin.html
58.
Wendell Cox Consultancy (n.d.) US Rural Interstate Highway (Motorway) Fatality Rates and Higher Speed Limits. URL (consulted 10 May 2004): http://www.publicpurpose.com/ic-speed.htm
59.
Yunker, J.A. (1976) Is the Death Penalty a Deterrent to Homicide? Some Time Series Evidence. Journal of Behavioral Economics5(1): 45—81.
60.
Zedlewski, S., Clark, S., Meier, E. and Watson, K. (1996) Potential Effects of Congressional Welfare Reform Legislation on Family Incomes. URL (consulted 6 May 2004): http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=406622
61.
Zimring, F. and Hawkins, G. (1986) Capital Punishment and the American Agenda. Cambridge University Press:Cambridge.
62.
Zimring, F. and Hawkins, G. (1997) Concealed Handguns: The Counterfeit Deterrent. The Responsive Community7(2): 46—60.
