Most commercial dental composites contain liquid dimethacrylate monomers (including BIS-GMA or variations of it) and silica-containing compositions as inorganic reinforcing filler particles coated with methacrylate-functional silane coupling agents to bond the resin to the filler. They also contain initiators, accelerators, photo-initiators, photosensitizers, polymerization inhibitors, and UV absorbers.
Durability is a major problem with posterior composites. The typical life-span of posterior composites is from three to 10 years, with large fillings usually fewer than five years. Polymerization shrinkage and inadequate adhesion to cavity walls are remaining problems. Some pulp irritation can occur if deep restorations are not placed over a protective film. Some have advocated the use of glass-ionomer cement as a lining under resin composite restorations in dentin.
The concept of glass-ionomer cements (GICs) was introduced to the dental profession in the early 1970's. Current GICs may contain poly(acrylic acid) or a copolymer. Higher-molecular-weight copolymers may also be used to improve the physical properties of some GICs. Stronger and less-brittle hybrid materials have been produced by the addition of watersoluble compatible polymers to form light-curing GIC formulations.
The ion-leachable aluminosilicate glass powder, in an aqueous solution of a polymer or copolymer of acrylic acid, is attacked by the hydrated protons of the acid, causing the release of aluminum and calcium ions. Salt bridges are formed, and a gel matrix surrounds the unreacted glass particles. The matrix is adhesive to mineralized tissues. Provisions must be made for maintenance of the water balance of restorations for the first 24 hours. A varnish to seal newly-placed restorations is provided by most manufacturers. The introduction of metal powder to GICs significantly improved abrasion resistance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonucci JM (1987). Formulation and evaluation of resin modified glass ionomer cements. Trans 13th Ann Meeting: 225.
Arnold J. (1990). Glass ionomer vements (letter). Aust Dent J35:185.
4.
Atkinson AS, Pearson GJ (1985). The evolution of glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J159:335-337.
5.
Bergman M. (1990). Side-effects of amalgam and its alternatives: local, systemic and environmental. Int Dent J40:4-10.
6.
BiedermanJD( 1989). Direct composite resin inlay. J Prosthet Dent62:249-253.
7.
Blagojevic B., Mount GJ (1989). A laboratory study of glass ionomer cement in relation to clinical dentistry. Aust Dent J33:320.
8.
Bowen RL (1956). Use of epoxy resins in restorative materials. J Dent Res35:360-369.
9.
Bowen RL, inventor (1962). Dental filling material comprising vinyl silane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of bis phenol and glycidyl acrylate. US patent 3,066,112.
10.
Bowen RL, inventor (1965a). Silica-resin direct filling material and method of preparation. US patents 3,194,783 and 3,194,784.
11.
Bowen RL, inventor (1965b). Method of preparing a monomer having phenoxy and methacrylate groups linked by hydroxy glyceryl groups, US patent 3,179,623.
12.
Bowen RL, Paffenbarger GC, Mullineaux AL (1968). A laboratory and clinical comparison of silicate cements and a direct-filling resin: a progress report. J Prosthet Dent20:426.
13.
Cheung GS (1990). Reducing marginal leakage of posterior composite resin restorations: areview of clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent63:286-288.
14.
Coy HF (1953). Direct resin fillings. J Am Dent Assoc47:532.
15.
Crim GA ( 1989). Influence of bonding agents and composites on microleakage . J Prosthet Dent61:571-574.
16.
Crisp S., Lewis BG, Wilson AD (1976). Glass ionomer cements: chemistry of erosion. J Dent Res55:1032-1041.
17.
Croll TP (1990). Glass ionomers for infants, children, and adolescents . J Am Dent Assoc120:65-68.
Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S., Brunson D., Roberson TM (1989). Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater5:417-424.
20.
Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russell CM (1990). Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc121:251-255.
21.
Donly KJ, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME (1989). An in vitro investigation of the effect of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. JDent Res68:1234-1237.
22.
Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1988). Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent59:297-300.
23.
Goldstein RE (1989). Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am33:210-219, 305-318.
24.
Goshima KT, Goshima T. (1989). The optimum level of radiopacity in posterior composite resins. Dentomaxillofac Radiol18:19-21.
25.
Guelmann M., Fuks AB, Holan G., Grajower R. (1989). Marginal leakage of class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in vitro study . J Dent Child56:277-282.
26.
Henschel Cjl (1949). Observations concerning in vivo disintegration of silicate cement restorations. J Dent Res28:528.
27.
Hunt PR ( 1990). Microconservative restorations for approximal carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc120:37-40.
28.
King SW, Savory J., Will MR ( 1981). The clinical biochemistry of aluminum. CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci14:1-20.
29.
Knibbs PJ, Plant CG (1989). An evaluation of a rapid setting glass ionomer cement in general dental practice. Aust Dent J34:459-465.
30.
McKinney JE, Antonucci JM (1986). Wear and microhardness of two experimental dental composites. J Dent Res66 :1134-1139.
31.
McLean JW (1980). Aesthetics in dentistry. Br Dent J149:368-373.
McLean JW, Gasser O., inventors (1985a). Powdered dental material and process for the preparation thereof. US patent 4,527,979.
34.
McLean JW, Gasser O. (1985b). Glass-cermet cements. Quint Int16:1055-1066.
35.
Mertz-FairhurstEJ,Williams JE, Pierce KL, Smith CD (1991). Sealed restorations: 4-year results. Am J Dent4:43-49.
36.
Meryon SD, Jakeman KJ (1987). Aluminum and dental materials-a study in vitro of its potential release and toxicity. Int Endod J20:16-19.
37.
Mitra SB (1991a). Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. JDentRes70 :72-74.
38.
Mitra SB (1991b). In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res70:75-78.
39.
Mjör IA, Wennberg A. (1985). Biocompatibility considerations of composite resins. A discussion paper. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Peter Szulc Publishing, 83-90.
40.
Momoi Y., Iwase H., Nakano Y., Kohno A. (1990). Gradual increases in marginal leakage of resin composite restorations with thermal stress. J Dent Res69:1659-1663.
41.
Mount GJ (1989). The tensile strength of the union between various glass ionomer cements and various composite resins. Aust Dent J34:136-146.
42.
Mount GJ (1990a). Esthetics with glass-ionomer cements and the "sandwich" technique. Quint Int21:93-101.
43.
Mount GJ (1990b). Restorations of eroded areas. J Am Dent Assoc120:31-35.
44.
Nicholson JW, Brookman PJ, Lacy OM, Wilson AD (1988). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of the role of tartaric acid in glass-ionomer dental cements. J Dent Res67:1451-1454.
45.
Paffenbarger GC, Nelsen RJ, Sweeney WT ( 1953). Direct and indirect filling resins: a review of some physical and chemical properties. J Am Dent Assoc47:516.
46.
Paffenbarger GC, Schoonover IC, Souder W. (1938). Dental silicate cements: physical and chemical properties and a specification. J Am Dent Assoc25:32.
47.
Penning C., Van Amerongen JP (1990). Microleakage of extended and nonextended class I composite resin and sealant restorations. J Prosthet Dent64:131-134.
48.
Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Wilson AD (1986). Glass-ionomer cements of improved flexural strength . J Dent Res65 :146-148.
49.
Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Scarbrough AR, Hembree JH (1990). Microleakage of gluma bond, scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique. Am J Dent3 :195-198.
50.
Rose EE, Lal J., Green R., Cornell J. ( 1955a). Direct resin filling materials: coefficient of thermal expansion and water sorption of polymethyl methacrylate. J Dent Res34 :589-596.
51.
Rose EE, Lal J., Williams NB, Falcetti JP (1955b). The screening of material s for adhesion to human tooth structure. J Dent Res34:577-588.
52.
Ruyter E. (1984). Kompositte tannfyllingsmaterialer. Tandlakartidningen76:1207.
53.
Ruyter E., Svendsen SA (1978). Remaining methacrylate groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand36:75.
54.
Sarkar NK, El Mallakh B., Graves R. (1988). Silver release from metal-reinforced glass ionomers . Dent Mater4:103.
55.
Saunders WP, Grieve AR, Russell EM, Alani AH (1990a). The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations. J Oral Rehabil17:519-527.
56.
Saunders WP, Strang R., Ahmad I. (1990b). In vitro assessment of the microleakage around preventive resin (laminate) restorations. J Dent Child57:433-436.
57.
Schmitt WP, Purrmann R., Jochum P., Gasser O., inventors (1985). Mixing component for dental glass ionomer cements. US patent 4,360,605.
58.
Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR (1989). Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J Prosthodont2:217-223.
59.
Simmons JJ (1990). Silver-alloy powder and glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc120:49-52.
60.
Smales RJ, Gerke DC (1990). The use of glass ionomer cements for restoring occlusal tooth surfaces. Aust Dent J35:181-182.
61.
Smales RJ, Gerke DC, White IL (1990). Clinical evaluation of occlusal glass ionomer, resin, and amalgam restorations. J Dent18:243-249.
62.
Smales RJ, Joyce K. (1978). Finished surface texture, abrasion resistance, and porosity of ASPA glass-ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent40:549-553.
63.
Smith DC (1968). A new dental cement. Br Dent J125 :381-384.
64.
Smith DC (1971). A review of the zinc polycarboxylate cements. J Can Dent Assoc37:22-30.
65.
Smith DC (1990). Composition and characteristics of glass ionomer cements. J Am Dent Assoc120:20-22.
66.
Sulong MZ, Aziz RA ( 1990). Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent63:342-349.
67.
Suzuki M., inventor (1976). Dental cement composition. US patent 3,962,267.
68.
Suzuki M., Jordan RE (1990). Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique. J Am Dent Assoc120:55-57.
69.
Tezuka C., Karasawa S., inventors (1978). Setting solution for dental glass ionomer cements. US patent 4,089,830.
70.
Tylman SC, Peyton FA (1946). Acrylic and other synthetic resins used in dentistry . Philadelphia (PA): JB Lippincott .
71.
Van Dijken JW, Wing KR, Ruyter IE (1989). An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in class I and class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand47 :401-407.
72.
Watson TF (1990). A confocal microscopic study of some factors affecting the adaptation of a light-cured glass ionomer to tooth tissue. J Dent Res69:1531-1538.
73.
Watts DC, Wilson NH, Omer DE ( 1990). Radiographic inhomogeneity of posterior composites . J Oral Rehabil17:151-155.
74.
Wendt, SL Jr ( 1991 ). Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays. Am J Dent4:10-14.
75.
Wilson AD, Crisp S., Abel G. ( 1977). Characterization of glass ionomer cements. 4. Effect of molecular weight on physical properties. J Dent5:117-120.
76.
Wilson AD, Kent BE ( 1971). The glass-ionomer cement. A new translucent dental filling material. J Appl Chem Biotech21:313.
77.
Wilson AD, Kent BE ( 1972). A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J132:133-135.
78.
Wilson AD, McLean JW (1988). Glass ionomer cement. London (England): Quintessence.
79.
Wilson AD, Prosser HJ (1984). A survey of inorganic and polyelectrolyte cements . Br Dent J157:449-454.
80.
Wilson EG, Mandadjieff M., Brindock T. (1990). Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations . Dent Clin North Am34:27-44.
81.
Wong Tcc, Bryant RW (1985). Glass ionomer cements: dispensing and strength . Aust J Dent30:336-340.
