Documented cases of oral mucosa and skin affections related to amalgam restorations are rare, although the exact incidence is unknown. Lesions of the oral mucosa may be due to specific immunologic or non-specific toxic reactions toward products generated from restorations. The immunologic reaction most probably involved in mucosal affections related to amalgam is the delayed or cell-mediated (type IV) reaction. Such reactions are seen in contact allergy, and the term "contact lesions of the oral mucosa" has been used. There is a much lower tendency of sensitization through mucous membranes than through skin, and it is questionable whether mercury released from amalgam restorations is able to sensitize a patient.
A chronic toxic reaction may be established due to repeated or constant influence to toxic agents in low concentrations over long periods. Such reactions are most frequently localized to the contact zone with the toxic agent. Chronic toxic reactions may possibly be seen in areas of the oral mucosa in direct contact with amalgam fillings. Since the clinical features of these lesions do not differ from those of lesions due to contact hypersensitivity, the diagnosis is obtained by exclusion based on a negative patch test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Axell T. (1976). A prevalence study of oral mucosal lesions in an adult Swedish population (thesis). Odontol Revy27 (36 Suppl):1-103.
2.
Axell T., Holmstrup P., Kramer Irh, Pindborg JJ, Shear M. (1984). International seminar on oral leukoplakia and associated lesions related to tobacco habits. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol12:145-154.
3.
Axell T., Nilner K., Nilsson B. (1983). Clinical evaluation of patients referred with symptoms related to oral galvanism. Swed Dent J7:169-178.
4.
Banoczy J., Roed-Petersen B., Pindborg JJ, Inovay J. (1979). Clinical and histologic studies on electrogalvanically induced oral white lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol48:319-323.
5.
Bauer JG, First HO (1982). The toxicity of mercury in dental amalgam. CA Dent Assoc J10:47-61.
6.
Baurle G., Schonberger A. (1986). Glossodynie-indikation zur epikutantestung? Z Hautkr61:1175-1184.
7.
Bolewska J., Hansen HJ, Holmstrup P., Piindborg JJ, Stangerup M. (1990a). Oral mucosal lesions related to silver amalgam restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol70 :55-58.
8.
Bolewska J., Holmstrup P., Møller-Madsen B., Kenrad B., Danscher G. (1990b). Amalgam associated mercury accumulations in normal oral mucosa, oral mucosal lesion of lichen planus and contact lesions associated with amalgam. J Oral Pathol Med19:39-42.
9.
Brune D. (1986). Metal release from dental biomaterials. Biomaterials7:163-175.
10.
Djerassi E., Berova N. (1969). The possibilities of allergic reactions from silver amalgam restorations. Int Dent J19:481-488.
11.
Eversole LR, Ringer M. (1984). The role of dental restorative metals in the pathogenesis of oral lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol57:383-387.
12.
Fernström Aib, Frykholm KO, Huldt S. (1962). Mercury allergy with eczematous dermatitis due to silver-amalgam fillings. Br Dent J113:204-206.
13.
Finne K., Goransson K., Winckler L. (1982). Oral lichen planus and contact allergy to mercury . Int J Oral Surg11:236-239.
14.
Franz G. (1982). The frequency of allergy to dental materials. J Dent Assoc S Afr37:805-810.
15.
Freden H., Hellden L., Milleding P. (1974). Mercury content in gingival tissues adjacent to amalgam fillings. Odontol Revy25:207-210.
16.
Fregert S. (1981). Manual of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Copenhagen (Denmark): Munksgaard , 71-83.
17.
Frykholm KO (1957). Allergy to mercury from amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand (22 Suppl)15:61-70.
18.
Gaul LE ( 1966). Immunity of the oral mucosa in epidermal sensitization to mercury. Arch Dermatol93:45-46.
19.
Gotz H., Fortmann I. (1959). Bewirken amalgamfüllungen der zahne eine quecksilbersensibilisierung der haut? Z Hautkr26:34-36.
20.
Hensten-Pettersen A. (1984). Allergiske reaksjoner på dentale materialer. Nor Tandlaegeforen Tid94:573-578.
21.
Hensten-Pettersen A., Holland RI (1985). Bivirkninger av dentala material. Tandldkartidningen77:1103-1125.
22.
Holmstrup P. (1991). Oral mucosa reactions related to silver amalgam . In: Horsted-Bindslev P, Magos L, Holmstrup P , Arenholdt-Bindslev D, editors. Dental amalgam-a health hazard?Copenhagen (Denmark): Munksgaard, 62-82.
23.
Holmstrup P., Schiøtz AW, Westergaard J. (1990). Effect of dental plaque control on gingival lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol69:585-590.
24.
James J., Ferguson MM, Forsyth A., Tulloch N., Lamey P.-J (1987). Oral lichenoid reactions related to mercury sensitivity . Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg25:474-480.
25.
Juhlin L., Öhman S. (1968). Allergic reaction to mercury in red tattoos and mucosa adjacent to amalgam fillings. Acta Derm Venereol48:103-105.
26.
Kaga M., Seale NS, Hanawa T., Ferracane JL, Okabe T. (1988). Cytotoxicity of amalgams. J Dent Res67:1221-1224.
27.
Kallus T., Mjor IA ( 1991). Incidence of adverse effects of dental materials . Scand J Dent Res99:236-240.
28.
Knychalska-Karwan Z. (1966). Przyczynek do roli pradow elektrogalwanicznych w leukoplaky jamy ustnej. Czasopismo Stomatol19:10-15.
29.
Leirskar J. (1974). On the mechanism of cytotoxicity of silver and copper amalgams in a cell culture system. Scand J Dent Res82:74-81.
Lindmaier A., Lindemayr H. (1989). Probleme mit zahnprothesen und zahnfullungsmaterialien: epicutantestergebnisse, konsequenzen und nachbeobachtung. Z Hautkr64:24-30.
32.
Lundstrom JM (1984). Allergy and corrosion of dental materials in patients with oral lichen planus. Int J Oral Surg13 :16-24.
33.
Liiders G. (1987). Exogen induzierte erkrankungen der mundschleimhaut . Z Hautkr62:603-612.
Merritt K. (1986). Biochemistry. Hypersensitivity. Clinical reaction . In: International workshop. Biocompatibility, toxicity and hypersensitivity to alloy systems used in dentistry. Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan School of Dentistry .
36.
Mobacken H., Hersle K., Sloberg K., Thilander H. (1984). Oral lichen planus: hypersensitivity to dental restoration material. Contact Dermatitis10:10-15.
37.
Nakayama H., Niki F., Shono M., Hada S. ( 1983). Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis9:411-417.
38.
Phillips RW, Schnell RJ, Shafer WG (1968). Failure of galvanic current to produce leukoplakia in rats. J Dent Res47:666.
39.
Sprengler H. (1958). Krankheiten der mundschleimhaut und der lippen . Stuttgart (Germany): Thieme Verlag .
40.
Stenman E., Bergman M. (1989). Hypersensitivity to dental materials in a referred group of patients. Scand J Dent Res97:76-83.
41.
Thomson J., Russell JA (1970). Dermatitis due to mercury following amalgam dental restorations. Br J Dermatol82:292-297.
42.
Thorn JJ, Holmstrup P., Rindum J., Pindborg JJ (1988). The course of various clinical forms of oral lichen planus. A prospective follow-up study of 611 patients. J Oral Pathol17:213-218.
43.
von Mayenburg J., Rakoski J., Szliska C. (1991). Patch testing with amalgam at various concentrations . Contact Dermatitis24:266-269.
44.
White IR, Smith Bgn (1984). Dental amalgam dermatitis. Br Dent J156:259-270.
45.
White RR, Brandt RL (1976). Development of mercury hypersensitivity among dental students. J Am Dent Assoc92:1204-1207.
46.
Wright F. (1971). Allergic reaction to mercury after dental treatment . NZ Dent J67:251-252.
47.
Yontchev E., Meding B., Hedegård B. (1986). Contact allergy to dental materials in patients with orofacial complaints. J Oral Rehabil13:183-190.
