Abstract
Good criteria for differential diagnosis exist to distinguish dental fluorosis from non-fluoride enamel opacities. An increasing number of reports indicates that the prevalence of fluorosis may be increasing among children in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities. Reasons for the increases may relate to misuse of dietary fluoride supplements, ingestion of fluoride toothpastes, or increasing amounts of fluoride in foods or the atmosphere. The intensity of the increased fluorosis is in the milder categories and is not generally unsightly. It should be recognized that a small amount of fluorosis may be an alternative to a greater prevalence of dental caries, a disease that may produce cosmetic problems and sequelae worse than those produced by fluorosis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
