Math anxiety represents a substantial barrier to many students’ math learning. In this paper, we apply interdisciplinary perspectives to data on over 13,200 ninth graders and their math teachers from the High School Longitudinal Study. Results suggest that being perceived as dis/abled relates to heightened math anxiety regardless of adolescents’ gender, or race and ethnicity. Our intersectional approach reveals that adolescents’ expressions of math anxiety do not always correspond with gender, racial, and ethnic stereotypes, with Black girls, Black boys, and Latine boys expressing relatively low levels of math anxiety. Finally, consistent with the principles of inclusion and universal design, placing students into groups of mixed ability is the only teacher approach to grouping that does not relate to high levels of math anxiety for any subgroup of students. With intersectionality and interdisciplinariness the pillars of Disability Studies in Education, this study contributes to critical research approaches and policy considerations.
AinscowM. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change?Journal of Educational Change, 6, 109–124.
2.
AlegriaM.GreenJ. G.McLaughlinK. A.LoderS. (2015). Disparities in child and adolescent mental health and mental health services in the U.S. William T. Grant Foundation.
3.
AlldayR. A.DuhonG. J.Blackburn-EllisS.DyckeJ. L. V. (2011). The biasing effects of labels on direct observation by preservice teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(1), 52–58.
4.
AllensworthE.PonisciakS.MazzeoC. (2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago public schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research, Urban Education Institute, University of Chicago.
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
6.
AnnammaS. A.HandyT. (2019). DisCrit solidarity as curriculum studies and transformative praxis. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(4), 442–463.
7.
AshcraftM. H.KrauseJ. A.HopkoD. R. (2007). Is math anxiety a mathematical learning disability? In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 329–348). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
8.
AshcraftM. H.RidleyK. S. (2005). Handbook of mathematical cognition. Psychology Press.
9.
AustinM. (2020). Measuring high school curricular intensity over three decades. Sociology of Education, 93(1), 65–90.
10.
BaldwinJ. (1984). On being white and other lies. Essence. https://collectiveliberation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Baldwin_On_Being_White.pdf https://www.fredjoiner.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/On-Being-White-and-Other-Lies.pdf
11.
BanduraA. (1991). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. In SchwarzerR.WicklundR. (Eds.), Anxiety and self-focused attention (pp. 89-110). Routledge.
12.
BarnarttS. N. (2013). Introduction: Disability and intersecting statuses. In BarnarttS. N. (Ed.), Research in social science and disability (Volume 7: Disability and intersecting statuses) (pp. 1–20). Emerald Group.
13.
BarrowsJ.DunnS.LloydC. A. (2013). Anxiety, self-efficacy, and college exam grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 204–208.
14.
BellD. (1988). White superiority in America: Its legal legacy, its economic costs. Villanova Law Review, 33(5), 767.
15.
BettieJ. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. University of California Press.
16.
BiedermanJ.FaraoneS. V.MonuteauxM. C.GrossbardJ. R. (2004). How informative are parent reports of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms for assessing outcome in clinical trials of long-acting treatments? A pooled analysis of parents’ and teachers’ reports. Pediatrics, 113(6), 1667–1671.
17.
BiedermanJ.GaoH.RogersA. K.SpencerT. J. (2006). Comparison of parent and teacher reports of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms from two placebo-controlled studies of atomoxetine in children. Biological Psychiatry, 60(10), 1106–1110.
18.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(6), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000268530
19.
BovedaM.AnnammaS. A. (2023). Beyond making a statement: An intersectional framing of the power and possibilities of positioning. Educational Researcher, 52(5), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231167149
20.
BrownD. L.SegristD. (2016). African American career aspirations: Examining the relative influence of internalized racism. Journal of Career Development, 43(2), 177–189.
21.
BussingR.MasonD. M.LeonC. E.SinhaK. (2003). Agreement between CASA parent reports and provider records of children’s ADHD services. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 30, 462–469.
22.
CarbonaroW.CovayE. (2010). School sector and student achievement in the era of standards based reforms. Sociology of Education, 83(2), 160–182.
23.
CarliL. L.AlawaL.LeeY.ZhaoB.KimE. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women do not equal scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244–260.
24.
CechE. A.MetzA.SmithJ. L.de VriesK. (2017). Epistemological dominance and social inequality: Experiences of Native American science, engineering, and health students. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(5), 743–774.
25.
CechE.RubineauB.SilbeyS.SeronC. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 641–666.
26.
ChooH. Y.FerreeM. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.
27.
CloughP. T.HalleyJ. (Eds.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Duke University Press.
28.
CohenE. G.LotanR. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
29.
ConnorD. F.SteeberJ.McBurnettK. (2010). A review of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder complicated by symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 31(5), 427–440.
30.
ConnorD. J.GabelS. L.GallagherD. J.MortonM. (2008). Disability studies and inclusive education—Implications for theory, research, and practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5–6), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802377482
31.
CrosnoeR.Riegle-CrumbC.MullerC. (2007). Gender, self-perception, and academic problems in high school. Social Problems, 54(1), 118–138. [Add Health/AHAA].
32.
de BreyC.MusuL.McFarlandJ.Wilkinson-FlickerS.DilibertiM.ZhangA.BranstetterC.WangX. (2019). Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
33.
DemerathP. (2009). Producing success: The culture of personal advancement in an American high school. University of Chicago Press.
34.
DiemS.YoungM. D. (2015). Considering critical turns in research on educational leadership and policy. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 838–850.
35.
DixonA. R.TellesE. E. (2017). Skin color and colorism: Global research, concepts, and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 405–424.
36.
DominaT.HanselmanP.HwangN.McEachinA. (2016). Detracking and tracking up: Mathematics course placements in California middle schools, 2003–2013. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1229–1266.
37.
DominaT.McEachinA.PennerA. (2015). Aiming high and falling short: California’s eighth-grade algebra-for-all effort. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 275–295.
38.
Dudley-MarlingC. (2004). The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 482–489.
39.
DuPaulG. J.MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MaczugaS. (2016). Academic and social functioning associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Latent class analyses of trajectories from kindergarten to fifth grade. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(7), 1425–1438.
40.
DupreyM. A.PrattD. J.JewellD. M.CominoleM. B.FritchL. B.RitchieE. A.RogersJ. E.WescottJ. D.WilsonD. H. (2018). High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09) base-year to second follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2018-140). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
41.
EatonA. A.SaundersJ. F.JacobsonR. K.WestK. (2019). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3–4), 127–141.
42.
EpsteinD.MendickH.MoreauM.-P. (2010). Imagining the mathematician: Young people talking about popular representations of maths. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(1), 45–60.
43.
EsmondeI. (2009). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008–1043.
44.
FaraoneS. V.BidermanJ.ZimmermanB. (2005). Correspondence of parent and teacher reports in medication trials. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 14(1), 20–27.
45.
FinsterM.MillerJ. (2014). Who’s at the top? It depends. . . identification of highest performing schools for Newsweek’s 2014 high school rankings. Westat.
46.
FirestoneS. (1970). The dialectic of sex. HarperCollins.
47.
FishR. E. (2019). Standing out and sorting in: Exploring the role of racial composition in racial disparities in special education. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2573–2608.
48.
FletcherJ. M.DentonC.FrancisD. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 545–552.
49.
FrancomeT.HewittD. (2020). My math lessons are all about learning from your mistakes’: How mixed-attainment mathematics grouping affects the way students experience mathematics. Educational Review, 72(4), 475–494.
50.
FurnerJ. M.DuffyM. L. (2002). Equity for all students in the new millennium: Disabling math anxiety. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(2), 67–74.
51.
GaertnerM. N.KimJ.DesJardinsS. L.McClartyK. L. (2014). Preparing students for college and careers: The causal role of algebra II. Research in Higher Education, 55(2), 143–165. JSTOR.
52.
GallagherD. J.Hernández-SacaD.HanleyW. (2023). Looking for something outside of ourselves: The politics of researching race and dis/ability and (special) education. In TierneyR. J.RizviF.ErcikanK. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (4th ed., pp. 497–505). Elsevier Science.
53.
GermanJ. D.VillapandoK. D. C.ResilvaJ. P.QuiambaoJ. R. C.GuevarraA. R. (2020). Effects of various seating arrangements on academic performance of grade 11 students in statistics. IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Bangkok, Thailand.
54.
GillbornD.WarmingtonP.DernackS. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179.
55.
GilmanC. P. (1898). Women and economics: A study of the economic relation between men and women as a factor in social evolution. Small, Maynard & Co.
56.
GoetzT.BiegM.LüdtkeO.PekrunR.HallN. C. (2013). Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics?Psychological Science, 24(10), 2079–2087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486989
57.
GrayS. A.ChabanP.MartinussenR.GoldbergR.GotliebH.KronitzR.HockenberryM.TannockR. (2012). Effects of a computerized working memory training program on working memory, attention, and academics in adolescents with severe LD and comorbid ADHD: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(12), 1277–1284.
58.
HallinanM. T. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.
59.
HancockA.-M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.
60.
HarperS. R.DavisC. H.III. (2012). They (don’t) care about education: A counternarrative on Black male students’ responses to inequitable schooling. The Journal of Educational Foundations, 26(1/2), 103.
HenigR. M. (2017). Rethinking gender. National Geographic.
63.
Hernández-SacaD. I.CannonM. A. (2016). Disability as psycho-emotional disablism: A theoretical and philosophical review of education theory and practice. In PetersM. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–7). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_456-1
64.
Hernández-SacaD. I.PearsonH.VoulgaridesC. K. (Eds.). (2023). Understanding the boundary between disability studies and special education through consilience, self-study, and radical love. Lexington Books.
65.
HillH. C. (2016). 50 years ago, one report introduced Americans to the Black-White achievement gap. Here’s what we’ve learned since. Chalkbeat.
66.
HinshawS. P.SchefflerR. M. (2014). The ADHD explosion-myths, medication, money, and today’s push for performance. Oxford University Press.
67.
HoA. (2004). To be labeled, or not to be labeled: That is the question. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 86–92.
68.
IqtadarS.Hernández-SacaD.EllisonS. (2020). “If it wasn’t my race, it was other things like being a woman, or my disability”: A qualitative research synthesis of disability research. Disability Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 1–40.
69.
IrizarryS.WilliamsS. (2013). Lending student voice to Latino ELL migrant children’s perspectives on learning. Journal of Latinos and Education, 12(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2013.765801
70.
IrizarryY. (2021). On track or derailed? Race, advanced math, and the transition to high school. Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 7, 1–21.
71.
JafarA. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies?Emergency Medical Journal, 35(5), 323–324.
72.
JaramilloJ.MelloZ. R.WorrellF. C. (2015). Ethnic identity, stereotype threat, and perceived discrimination among Native American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(4), 769–775.
73.
JenkinsR. (1998). Towards a social model of (in)competence. In JenkinsR. (Ed.), Questions of competence – Culture, classification and intellectual disability (pp. 222–230). Cambridge University Press.
74.
JohnsonE. S.ClohessyA. B.ChakravarthyP. (2021). A self-regulated learner framework for students with learning disabilities and math anxiety. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(3), 163–171.
75.
JohnsonV.EllisR. S.HutchersonV. (2020). Evaluating a strategy for implementation and sustainability of school-based health centers in 3 disparate communities. The Journal of School Health, 90(4), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12875
76.
KantnerJ. (2008). The only absolute truth in mathematics is the myth of mathematics as universal. Perspectives: The New York Journal of Adult Learning, 6(2), 2–10.
77.
KlingnerJ. K.ArtilesA. J.BarlettaL. M. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or LD?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 108–128.
78.
KrogstadJ. M.CohnD. (2014). U.S. census looking at big changes in how it asks about race and ethnicity. Pew Research Center.
79.
KuglerA. D.TinsleyC. H.UkhanevaO. (2017). Choice of majors: Are women really different from men? (No. 0898-2937). National Bureau of Economic Research.
80.
LambertR. (2015). Constructing and resisting disability in mathematics classrooms: A case study exploring the impact of different pedagogies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9587-6
81.
LambertR. (2017). “When I am being rushed it slows down my brain”: Constructing self-understandings as a mathematics learner. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(5), 521–531.
82.
LambertR.Hernández-SacaD.Mireles-RiosR.CastroM. M. (2022). “It is like a feeling”: Theorizing emotion in mathematics through complex embodiment. Mathematics, 10(6), 937.
83.
LambertR.TanP. (2017). Conceptualizations of students with and without disabilities as mathematical problem solvers in educational research: A critical review. Education Sciences, 7(2), 1–18.
84.
LeaperC.FarkasT.BrownC. S. (2012). Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 268–282.
85.
LevineR.StevensonD. L. (1997). Changes in America’s High Schools, 1980–1993: The National Longitudinal Study of Schools. U.S. Department of Education.
86.
LoretteP. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of positionality in quantitative research: Overcoming linguistic and cultural ‘knowledge gaps’ thanks to ‘knowledgeable collaborators.’Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(8), 657–671.
87.
LouY.AbramiP. C.SpenceJ. C.PoulsenC.ChambersB.d’ApolloniaS. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423–458.
88.
LoveH. R.NyegenyeS. N.WiltC. L.AnnammaS. A. (2021). Black families’ resistance to deficit positioning: Addressing the paradox of black parent involvement. Race Ethnicity and Education, 24(5), 637–653.
89.
LuttenbergerS.WimmerS.PaechterM. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322.
90.
MalmgrenK. W. (1998). Cooperative learning as an academic intervention for students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(4), 1–8.
91.
MaloneyE. A.BeilockS. L. (2012). Math anxiety: Who has it, why it develops, and how to guard against it. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 404–406.
92.
MartinD. B. (2012). Learning mathematics while Black. Educational Foundations, 26(1–2), 47–66.
93.
MartinD. B. (2019). Equity, inclusion, and antiblackness in mathematics education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 459–478.
94.
MasonE. N. (2023). Teachers’ views of the mathematical capabilities of students with disabilities: A mixed methods study. Teachers College Record, 125(2), 178–202.
95.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L.CrowellE. W. (2000). Learning disabilities and ADHD: Overlapping spectrum disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 417–424.
96.
MazzaG. L.EndersC. K.RuehlmanL. S. (2015). Addressing item-level missing data: A comparison of proration and full information maximum likelihood estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(5), 504–519.
97.
McDermottR.RaleyJ. (2009). “The tell-tale body”: The constitution of disabilities in school. In AyersW.QuinnT.StovalD. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp. 431-445). Erlbaum.
98.
McGeeE. O.MartinD. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389.
99.
McNairT. B.BensimonE. M.Malcom-PiqueuxL. (2020). From equity talk to equity walk: Expanding practitioner knowledge for racial justice in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.
100.
MendickH. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing “good at maths.”Gender & Education, 17(2), 203–219.
101.
MerollaD. M.JacksonO. (2019). Structural racism as the fundamental cause of the academic achievement gap. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1–13.
102.
MickelsonR. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112896
103.
MortonK.Riegle-CrumbC. (2019). Who gets in? Examining inequality in eight-grade algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(5), 539–554.
104.
MulryanC. M. (1992). Student passivity during cooperative small groups in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 85(5), 261–273.
105.
NelsonC. A.SheridanM. A. (2011). Lessons from neuroscience research for understanding causal links between family and neighborhood characteristics and educational outcomes. In DuncanG.J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 27–46). Russell Sage Foundation.
106.
NormanJ. (2012). Maths anxiety in secondary school students. Radical Statistics, 105, 40–56.
107.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.
108.
Office for Civil Rights. (2018). 2015–16 civil rights data collection: STEM course taking. U.S. Department of Education.
109.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2018). 40th annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
110.
OhanJ. L.VisserT. A. W.StrainM. C.AllenL. (2011). Teachers’ and education students’ perceptions of and reactions to children with and without the diagnostic label “ADHD.”Journal of School Psychology, 49(1), 81–105.
111.
OmiM.WinantH. (1986). Racial formations. In OmiM.WinantH. (Eds.), Racial formation in the United States (2nd ed., pp. 3–13). Routledge.
112.
OrfieldG. (2015). Housing segregation produces unequal schools: Causes and solutions. In CarterP.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 40-60). Oxford University Press.
113.
ParekhG. (2023). Applied quantitative inquiry through a critical disability studies lens. In DiemS.YoungM. D. (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 414–429). Routledge.
114.
PfeiferM. A.ReiterE. M.CorderoJ. J.DangremondS. (2021). Inside and out: Factors that support and hinder the self-advocacy of undergraduates with ADHD and/or specific learning disabilities in STEM. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(2), ar1–ar17.
115.
RattanA.GoodC.DweckC. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737.
116.
ReaserA.PrevattF.PetscherY.ProctorB. (2007). The learning and study strategies of college students with ADHD. Psychology in the Schools, 44(6), 627–638.
117.
Riegle-CrumbC. (2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 101–122. Add Health/AHAA. https://doi.org/10.1086/506495
118.
Riegle-CrumbC.MortonK.BlanchardS. (2020). Developing STEM ambitions: An examination of inequality by gender and race/ethnicity. In PolnickB.BallengerJ.IrbyB.AbdelrahmanN. (Eds.), Girls and women of color in STEM: Navigating the double bind in K-12 education (pp. 69-90). Information Age Publishing.
RoderickM.Kelley-KempleT.JohnsonD. W.BeechumN. O. (2014). Preventable failure: Improvements in long-term outcomes when high schools focused on the ninth grade year. The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
121.
SanabriaT.PennerA. (2017). Weeded out? Gendered responses to failing calculus. Social Sciences, 6(47), 1–14.
122.
ScherzZ.OrenM. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965–985.
123.
SchneiderB.SwansonC. B.Riegle-CrumbC. (1997). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 25–53.
124.
SeoE.LeeY. (2021). Stereotype threat in high school classrooms: How it links to teacher mindset climate, mathematics anxiety, and achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50, 1410–1423.
125.
ShifrerD. (2013). Stigma of a label: Educational expectations for high school students labeled with a learning disability. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 462–480.
126.
ShifrerD. (2016). Stigma and stratification limiting the math course progression of adolescents labeled with a learning disability. Learning and Instruction, 42(1), 47–57.
127.
ShifrerD. (2018). Clarification of the social roots of the disproportionate labeling of racial minorities and males with learning disabilities. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(3), 384–406.
128.
ShifrerD. (2022). Contextualizing educational disparities and the evaluation of teacher quality. Social Problems, 69(2), 841–886.
129.
ShifrerD.CallahanR.MullerC. (2013). Equity or marginalization? The high school course-taking of students labeled with a learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 656–682.
130.
ShifrerD.FishR. E. (2020). A multilevel investigation into contextual reliability in the designation of cognitive health conditions among U.S. children. Society and Mental Health, 10(2), 180–197.
131.
ShifrerD.PhillippoK.TilbrookN.MortonK. (2023). The relationship between ninth graders’ perceptions of teacher identity and their math identity: Differences by student race and school racial composition. Sociology of Education, 96(2), 129–148.
132.
ShildrickM. (2007). Dangerous discourses: Anxiety, desire, and disability. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 8(3), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240650701226490
133.
SmithJ. L.CechE.MetzA.HuntoonM.MoyerC. (2014). Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036945
134.
Spencer Foundation. (2023). Personal communication.
135.
SteeleJ. R.AmbadyN. (2006). “Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 428–436.
136.
SuldoS. M.GormleyM. J.DuPaulG. J.Anderson-ButcherD. (2014). The impact of school mental health on student and school-level academic outcomes: Current status of the research and future directions. School Mental Health, 6, 84–98.
137.
ThomasC. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Open University Press.
138.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399.
139.
WilsonV.SchiederJ. (2018). The rise in child poverty reveals racial inequality, more than a failed war on poverty. Economic Policy Institute.
140.
WolfeA. J. (2013). Competing with the Soviets: Science, technology and the state in Cold War America. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
