Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

College policies may support intentional cross-cultural interactions among peers. This study examines the impact of having an international roommate on the college outcomes of domestic U.S. students. Using institutional data on more than 6,600 U.S. students from a selective liberal arts college that serves low-income individuals, our analysis demonstrates the positive effects of being paired with an international roommate on U.S. students’ first-year GPA, subsequent GPAs, and second-year retention. However, our findings show no significant effects on graduation rates or retention rates beyond the second year. These findings point to the potential benefits of deliberate organizational and institutional policies to facilitate interactions among individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

Keywords

peer effects international students disadvantaged students college outcomes diversity and inclusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bacon

D. R.

Bean

(2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305284638

Bailey

Duncan

G. J.

Odgers

C. L.

(2017). Persistence and fadeout in the impacts of child and adolescent interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1232459

Beatty

A. S.

Walmsley

P. T.

Sackett

P. R.

Kuncel

N. R.

Koch

A. J.

(2015). The reliability of college grades. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12096

Boisjoly

Duncan

G. J.

Kremer

Levy

D. M.

Eccles

(2006). Empathy or antipathy? The impact of diversity. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1890–1905. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1890

Bowman

N. A.

(2010). College diversity experiences and cognitive development: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309352495

Bowman

N. A.

(2013). How much diversity is enough? The curvilinear relationship between college diversity interactions and first-year student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 54(8), 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9300-0

Bowman

N. A.

Park

J. J.

(2014). Interracial contact on college campuses: Comparing and contrasting predictors of cross-racial interaction and interracial friendship. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 660–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777344

Brady

R. R.

Insler

M. A.

Rahman

A. S.

(2017). Bad company: Understanding negative peer effects in college achievement. European Economic Review, 98, 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.013

Braunstein

McGrath

Pescatrice

(2000). Measuring the impact of financial factors on college persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 2(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.2190/0TTM-U8RA-V8FX-FYVA

10.

Brunello

de Paola

Scoppa

(2010). Peer effects in higher education: Does the field of study matter? Economic Inquiry, 48(3), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00235.x

11.

Burdett

Crossman

(2012). Engaging international students. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211240286

12.

Card

Solis

(2022). Measuring the effect of student loans on college persistence. Education Finance and Policy, 17(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00342

13.

Carrell

S. E.

Fullerton

R. L.

West

J. E.

(2009). Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1086/600143

14.

Carrell

S. E.

Hoekstra

West

J. E.

(2011). Is poor fitness contagious? Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.005

15.

Carrell

S. E.

Malmstrom

F. V.

West

J. E.

(2008). Peer effects in academic cheating. Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 173–207. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.43.1.173

16.

Carrell

S. E.

Sacerdote

B. I.

West

J. E.

(2013). From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica, 81(3), 855–882. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10168

17.

Chang

M. J.

Astin

A. W.

Kim

(2004). Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates: Some consequences, causes, and patterns. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000032327.45961.33

18.

Chesnaye

N. C.

Stel

V. S.

Tripepi

Dekker

F. W.

E. L.

Zoccali

Jager

K. J.

(2022). An introduction to inverse probability of treatment weighting in observational research. Clinical Kidney Journal, 15(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab158

19.

Duncan

G. J.

Boisjoly

Kremer

Levy

D. M.

Eccles

(2005). Peer effects in drug use and sex among college students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3576-2

20.

Dynarski

Libassi

Michelmore

Owen

(2021). Closing the gap: The effect of reducing complexity and uncertainty in college pricing on the choices of low-income students. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1721–1756. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200451

21.

Foster

(2006). It’s not your peers, and it’s not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.12.001

22.

Frijters

Islam

Pakrashi

(2019). Heterogeneity in peer effects in random dormitory assignment in a developing country. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 163, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.025

23.

Funk

M. J.

Westreich

Wiesen

Stürmer

Brookhart

M. A.

Davidian

(2011). Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(7), 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq439

24.

Geelhoed

R. J.

Abe

Talbot

D. M.

(2003). A qualitative investigation of U.S. students’ experiences in an international peer program. Journal of College Student Development, 44(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0004

25.

Gelman

(2020). Understanding the “average treatment effect” number. Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/06/30/ate/

26.

Glenn

M. E.

(1970). Appalachia in transition. Bethany Press.

27.

Gurin

Dey

Hurtado

Gurin

(2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330–367. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051

28.

Huntington-Klein

(2021). The effect: An introduction to research design and causality. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003226055

29.

Kim

Y. K.

Park

J. J.

Koo

K. K.

(2015). Testing self-segregation: Multiple-group structural modeling of college students’ interracial friendship by race. Research in Higher Education, 56(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9337-8

30.

King

Nielsen

(2019). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis, 27(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.11

31.

Kremer

Levy

(2008). Peer effects and alcohol use among college students. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.3.189

32.

Lunceford

J. K.

Davidian

(2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. Statistics in Medicine, 23(19), 2937–2960. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1903

33.

Lyle

D. S.

(2007). Estimating and interpreting peer and role model effects from randomly assigned social groups at west point. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 289–299.

34.

Lyle

D. S.

(2009). The effects of peer group heterogeneity on the production of human capital at west point. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 69–84.

35.

Manski

C. F.

(1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123

36.

Marmaros

Sacerdote

(2002). Peer and social networks in job search. European Economic Review, 46(4–5), 870–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00221-5

37.

McEwan

P. J.

Soderberg

K. A.

(2006). Roommate effects on grades: Evidence from first-year housing assignments. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9392-2

38.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

39.

Mehta

Stinebrickner

(2019). Time-use and academic peer effects in college. Economic Inquiry, 57(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12730

40.

Museus

S. D.

Saelua

(2018). How culturally engaging campus environments influence sense of belonging in college: An examination of differences between White students and students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000069

41.

Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. (2014). Berea college fact book 2013–2014.

42.

Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. (2015). Berea college fact book 2014–2015.

43.

Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. (2022). Berea college fact book 2021–2022.

44.

Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. (2023). Berea college fact book 2022–2023.

45.

Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. (2024). Berea college fact book 2023–2024.

46.

Park

J. J.

(2013). When diversity drops: Race, religion, and affirmative action in higher education. Rutgers University Press.

47.

Park

J. J.

Bowman

N. A.

(2015). Religion as bridging or bonding social capital: Race, religion, and cross-racial interaction for college students. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714560172

48.

Park

J. J.

Denson

Bowman

N. A.

(2013). Does socioeconomic diversity make a difference? Examining the effects of racial and socioeconomic diversity on the campus climate for diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 466–496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212468290

49.

Park

J. J.

Kim

Y. K.

(2013). Interracial friendship and structural diversity: Trends for Greek, religious, and ethnic student organizations. The Review of Higher Education, 37(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2013.0061

50.

Park

J. J.

Kim

Y. K.

Lue

Zheng

Parikh

Salazar

Liwanag

(2021). Who are you studying with? The role of diverse friendships in STEM and corresponding inequality. Research in Higher Education, 62(8), 1146–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09638-8

51.

Paul

(2024, April 18). What is lost when freshmen choose their roommates. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/18/opinion/roommates-college-strangers.html

52.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

53.

Pike

G. R.

Kuh

G. D.

(2006). Relationships among structural diversity, informal peer interactions and perceptions of the campus environment. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0037

54.

Sacerdote

(2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144131

55.

Sacerdote

(2014). Experimental and quasi-experimental analysis of peer effects: Two steps forward? Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-071813-104217

56.

Sakurai

McCall-Wolf

Kashima

E. S.

(2010). Building intercultural links: The impact of a multicultural intervention programme on social ties of international students in Australia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.11.002

57.

Shook

N. J.

Clay

(2012). Interracial roommate relationships: A mechanism for promoting sense of belonging at university and academic performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1168–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.005

58.

Sias

P. M.

Drzewiecka

J. A.

Meares

Bent

Konomi

Ortega

White

(2008). Intercultural friendship development. Communication Reports, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210701643750

59.

Stinebrickner

T. R.

(2006). What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1435–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.002

60.

Stinebrickner

T. R.

(2008). The causal effect of studying on academic performance. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1), 1868. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1868

61.

Stuart

E. A.

(2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313

62.

Tienda

(2013). Diversity ≠ inclusion. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13516164

63.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). Central Appalachia. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2021/demo/central-appalachia.pdf

64.

Vazzana

C. M.

Rudi-Polloshka

(2019). Appalachia has got talent, but why does it flow away? A study on the determinants of brain drain from rural USA. Economic Development Quarterly, 33(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242419844320

65.

Voss

P. R.

Long

D. D.

Hammer

R. B.

Friedman

(2006). County child poverty rates in the US: A spatial regression approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 25(4), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-9007-4

66.

Winston

Zimmerman

(2004). Peer effects in higher education. In Hoxby

C. M.

(Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (1st ed., pp. 395–424). University of Chicago Press.

67.

Wolniak

Ballerini

(2020). Peer effects, higher education. In Teixeira

P. N.

Shin

J. C.

(Eds.), The international encyclopedia of higher education systems and institutions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_84

68.

Zhang

(2017). It takes two shining lights to brighten the room: Peer effects with random roommate assignments. Education Economics, 25(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2016.1203867

69.

Zhao

C.-M.

Kuh

G. D.

Carini

R. M.

(2005). A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 209–231.

70.

Zimmerman

D. J.

(2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677

Effect of International Roommates on College Outcomes: Evidence from Students of Disadvantaged Backgrounds

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References