Alternative schooling has been staunchly advocated for by groups disillusioned by government-sponsored public schooling that want to take personal control of their children’s education. There are concerns, however, about nontraditional schooling options that do not meet standards that apply to public schools. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) specifies children’s fundamental educational rights. In the United States, this includes mastering basic English literacy and numerical abilities, as well as exposure to some scientific and historical knowledge needed to negotiate mainstream society. This paper focuses on how certain homeschooling and religious schooling practices run the risk of denying adolescents the right to the education necessary to work in the modern economy and achieve their potential. We argue that the United States should allow alternative schooling options but ensure that they conform to specific standards set by the state in order to meet the CRC goals.
Cohen-AlmagorR. (2021). Can group rights justify the denial of education to children? The Amish in the United States as a case study. SN Social Sciences, 1(7), 164–192.
10.
CoughlanR. W. (2018). Divergent trends in neighborhood and school segregation in the age of school choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(4), 349–366.
DavisD. S. (1997). The child's right to an open future: Yoder and beyond. Capital University Law Review, 26, 93–105.
13.
DwyerJ. G. (1994). Parents’ religion and children’s welfare: Debunking the doctrine of parents’ rights. California Law Review, 82(6), 1371–1447.
14.
DwyerJ. G. (1996). The children we abandon: Religious exemptions to child welfare and education laws as denials of equal protection to children of religious objectors. North Carolina Law Review, 74(5), 1321–1478.
15.
EcclesJ. S. (2005). Influences of parents' education on their children's educational attainments: The role of parent and child perceptions. London Review of Education, 3(3), 191–204.
16.
Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421. (1962).
17.
ElifsonK. W.HadawayC. K. (1985). Prayer in public schools: When church and state collide. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(3), 317–329.
18.
FastenbergA. (2019, October26). An overview and update on the establishment clause and the Blaine Amendment: State aid to - and regulation of- religious schools [Paper presentation]. Local & State Government Law Section Fall Meeting, Albany, NY.
19.
Fields-SmithC.KisuraM. W. (2013). Resisting the status quo: The narratives of black homeschoolers in metro-Atlanta and metro-DC. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(3), 265–283.
20.
FinemanM. A. (2009). Taking children's interests seriously. In FinemanM. A.WorthingtonK. (Eds.), What is right for children? The Competing paradigms of religion and human rights (pp. 229–237). Routledge.
GaitherM. (2009). Homeschooling in the USA: Past, present and future. Theory and Research in Education, 7(3), 331–346.
23.
GoodpastureM.EverettV. D.GaglianoM.NarayanA. P.SinalS. (2013). Invisible children. North Carolina Medical Journal, 74(1), 90–94.
24.
GranB. (2021). The sociology of children's rights. John Wiley & Sons.
25.
IsenbergE. J. (2007). What have we learned about homeschooling?Peabody Journal of Education, 82, 387–409.
26.
KalevH. D. (2004) Cultural rights or human rights: The case of female genital mutilation. Sex Roles, 51(5–6), 331–348.
27.
KohnA. (1998). Only for my kid. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 568–577.
28.
Konrad and Others v. Germany ECHR 35504/03. (2006).
29.
KunzmanR. (2009). Understanding homeschooling: A better approach to regulation. Theory and Research in Education, 7(3), 311–330.
30.
KunzmanR.GaitherM. (2020). Homeschooling: An updated comprehensive survey of the research. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 9(1), 253–336.
31.
LauenL. L. (2007). Contextual explanations of school choice. Sociology of Education, 80(3), 179–209.
32.
LubienskiC.PuckettT.BrewerT. J. (2013). Does homeschooling ‘work’? A critique of the empirical claims and agenda of advocacy organizations. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(3), 378–392.
33.
Leeper et al. v. Arlington Independent Schools District et al. NO. 17-88761-85 District Court (1987).
34.
Martin-ChangS.GouldO. N.MeuseR. E. (2011). The impact of home schooling on academic achievement: Evidence from homeschooled and traditionally schooled children. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43, 195–202.
35.
MazamaA.MusumunuG. (2015). African Americans and homeschooling: Motivations, opportunities, and challenges. Routledge.
36.
McClainL. C. (2009). Child, family, state, and gender equality in religious stances and human rights instruments: A preliminary comparison. In FinemanM. A.WorthingtonK. (Eds.), What is right for children? The competing paradigms of religion and human rights (pp. 19–44). Routledge.
McQuigganM.MegraM.GradyS. (2017). Parent and family involvement in education: Results from the national household education surveys program of 2016 (NCES 2017-102). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved April 23, 2023, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017102
39.
Mueller v. Allen, 463 U.S. 388. (1983).
40.
OkinS. M. (2002). Mistresses of their own destiny: Group rights, gender, and realistic rights of exit. Ethics, 112(2), 205–215.
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510. (1925).
43.
RaleyG. (2011). Yoder revisited: Why the landmark Amish schooling case could-and should-be overturned. Virginia Law Review, 97, 681–722.
44.
RentlenA. D. (2004). The cultural defense. Oxford University Press.
45.
RenzulliL. A.WerumR. E.KronbergA. K. (2020). The rise of homeschooling regulation in the era of school choice: Legislative and judicial trends, 1972–2009. Sociological Forum, 35(2), 297–322.
46.
RothschildZ. (2019). Free exercise’s outer boundary. Columbia Law Review, 119(6), 200–232.
47.
SaigerA. (2020). State regulation of curriculum in private religious schools: A constitutional analysis. In GreeneJ.BedrickJ. (Eds.), Yeshivas versus the State of New York: A case study in religious liberty in education (pp. 49–64). Rowman & Littlefiel.
48.
SchaferM. J.KhanS. S. (2017). Family economy, rural school choice, and flexischooling children with disabilities. Rural Sociology, 82(3), 524–547.
49.
School District of Abington Township, PA v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203. (1963).
50.
SewellW. H.ShahV. P. (1968). Social class, parental encouragement, and educational aspirations. The American Journal of Sociology, 73(5), 559–572.
StarkB. (2009). Rhetoric, religion, and human rights: ‘Save the children! In FinemanM. A.WorthingtonK. (Eds.), What is right for children? The competing paradigms of religion and human rights (pp. 45–57). Routledge.
WeckerM. (2019). New York State cracks down on Jewish schools: Senator Simcha Felder and Rabbi Chaim Dovid Zwiebel meet the long shadow of Joseph Hodges Choate. Education Next, 19(4), 28–38.
55.
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205. (1972).
56.
WitteJ.Jr.BrowningD. S. (2012). Christianity’s mixed contributions to children’s rights: traditional teachings, modern doubts. Emory Law Journal, 61(4), 991–1014.
