While commitment to a universal entitlement to education is highly desirable, some significant limitations have been identified in the right to education as currently expressed and implemented. This article assesses the contribution that the capabilities approach can make in this regard. While some proponents have suggested that capabilities should replace a rights framework, it is argued here that the elements of ‘threshold’ and ‘duty-bearer’ present in human rights are essential, and that a more promising approach is to combine the two frameworks. Three significant contributions that the capabilities approach can make in relation to Education for All are proposed: providing a fuller conception of the realization of the right to education; addressing the heterogeneity of learners; and guarding against an overly state-facing approach.
CurrenR (2009) Education as a social right in a diverse society. Journal of Philosophy of Education43(1): 45–56.
4.
FilmerDHasanAPritchettL (2006) A millennium learning goal: Measuring real progress in education. Working Paper 97. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
5.
GarcíaME (2004) Rethinking bilingual education in Peru: intercultural politics, state policy and indigenous rights. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism7(5): 348–67.
6.
GreanyK (2008) Rhetoric versus reality: exploring the rights-based approach to girls’ education in rural Niger. Compare38: 555–68.
7.
McCowanT (2010) Reframing the universal right to education. Comparative Education46(4): 509–25.
8.
NussbaumM (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
NussbaumM (2006) Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
OslerAStarkeyH (2010) Teachers and Human Rights Education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
11.
PoggeT (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
OsmaniS (2005) Poverty and human rights: building on the capability approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities6(2): 205–19.
13.
Right to Education Project (2011) Right to education project: promoting mobilisation and legal accountability. Available at: http://www.right-to-education.org/ (accessed 25 April 2011).
14.
RobeynsI (2005) The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities6(1): 93–114.
15.
RobeynsI (2006) Three models of education: rights, capabilities and human capital. Theory and Research in Education4(1) 69–84.
16.
SaitoM (2003) Amartya Sen’s capability approach to education: a critical exploration. Journal of Philosophy of Education37(1): 17–33.
17.
SenA (1982) Rights and agency. Philosophy and Public Affairs11: 3–39.
18.
SenA (1985) Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy82(4): 169–221.
19.
SenA (1992) Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20.
SenA (1999) Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy10(3): 3–17.
21.
SenA (2004) Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs32(4): 315–56.
22.
SenA (2005) Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development6(2): 151–66.
23.
SenA (2009) The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane.
24.
SubrahmanianR (2005) Gender equality in education: definitions and measurements. International Journal of Educational Development25(4): 395–407.
25.
TerziL (2008) Justice and Equality in Education: A Capability Perspective on Disability and Special Educational Needs. London: Continuum.
26.
TiklyLBarrettA (2009) Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. EdQual Working Paper, Quality, No. 8. Bristol: Edqual.
27.
TiklyLBarrettA (2011) Towards a framework for researching the quality of education in low-income countries. Comparative Education47(1): 1–23.
28.
TomasevskiK (2001) Human Rights Obligations: Making Education Available, Accessible, Acceptable and Adaptable. Right to Education Primers 3. Lund: Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law & Stockholm: SIDA.
29.
UNESCO (2011) The Hidden Crisis: Armed Conflict and Education: EFA Global Monitoring Report 2011. Paris: UNESCO.
30.
UNDP (2000) Human Development Report 2000: Human Rights and Human Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
UN (2003) The Human Rights Based Approach to development cooperation: towards a common understanding among UN agencies. Interagency Workshop on Human Rights Based Approach, Stamford, Connecticut. Available at: http://hrbaportal.org/?page_id=2127 (accessed 10 August 2011).
32.
UnterhalterE (2003) The capabilities approach and gendered education. An examination of South African complexities. Theory and Research in Education1(1): 7–22.
33.
UnterhalterE (2007) Gender, Schooling and Global Social Justice. London: Routledge.
34.
UnterhalterE (2009) Translations and transversal dialogues: an examination of mobilities associated with gender, education and global poverty reduction. Comparative Education45(3): 329–45.
35.
UnterhalterEBrighouseH (2007) Distribution of what for social justice in education? The case of Education for All by 2015. In: WalkerMUnterhalterE (eds) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, pp. 67–86. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
Van HeesM (2010) Rights, goals and capabilities. Presentation at the Human Development and Capability Association Conference, Amman, Jordan, 21–23 September.
37.
VaughanR (2007) Freedom through education: measuring capabilities in girls’ schooling. In: WalkerMUnterhalterE (eds) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, pp. 109–30. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
