College students across the United States are engaging in protests, sit-ins, and walk-outs, but when do these political acts result in tangible institutional policy changes? This paper draws on qualitative data from interviews and focus groups with 502 participants across the United States to examine when and why college student political behaviors influence institutional changes on college campuses. Findings from this study suggest that higher education institutions present different political opportunity structures for students to engage in activism. These political opportunity structures provide policy windows at the institutional level to affect campus wide change. To the extent that these changes promote diversity, equity, and inclusion though also depends on these varying structures. In this paper, a typology of these structures is presented to explain when student activism shapes institutional change and for whom.
AltbachP.CohenR. (1990). American student activism: The post-sixties transformation. The Journal of Higher Education, 61(1), 32–49.
2.
AntonioA. L. (2001). Diversity and the influence of friendship groups in college. The Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 63–89.
3.
AronsonJ. (1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3.
4.
BakerD. J.BlissettR. S. L. (2018). Beyond the incident: Institutional predictors of student collective action. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(2), 184–207.
5.
BarnhardtC. (2014). Campus-based organizing: Tactical repertoires of contemporary student movements. In BroadhurstC. J.MartinG. L. (Eds.), “Radical academia”? Understanding the climates for campus activists: New directions for higher education, Number 167 (pp. 43–58). John Wiley & Sons.
6.
BarnhardtC. L. (2015). Campus educational contexts and civic participation: Organizational links to collective action to collective action. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(1), 38–70.
7.
BastedoM. N.GumportP. J. (2003). Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in U.S. public higher education. Higher Education, 46, 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025374011204
8.
BeaumontE. (2011). Promoting political agency, addressing political inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 216–231.
9.
BeaumontE.ColbyA.EhrlichT.Torney-PurtaJ. (2006). Promoting political competence and engagement in college students: An empirical study. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(3), 249–270.
10.
BeemynB. (2003). The silence is broken: A history of the first lesbian, gay, and bisexual college student groups. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 12(2), 205–223.
11.
BennerP. (1985). Quality of life: A phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction, and understanding in nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 1–14.
12.
BrowerM. T.BenensonJ. (2015). Practicing democracy in the classroom: Equalizing opportunities to engage with public policies and issues. Diversity & Democracy, 2, 19.
13.
CampbellD. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437–454.
14.
CarnevaleA.StrohlJ. (2013). Separate and unequal: How higher education reinforces the intergenerational reproduction of White racial privilege. Center of Education and the Workforce, Georgetown Public Policy Institute, Georgetown University.
15.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
16.
FavorsJ. M. (2019). Shelter in a time of storm: How Black colleges fostered generations of leadership and activism. UNC Press Books.
17.
FernandezR.McAdamD. (1988). Social networks and social movements: Multiorganizational fields and recruitment to Mississippi freedom summer. Sociological Forum, 3(3), 357–382. Retrieved February3, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/684338
18.
GalstonW. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217–234.
19.
Goldrick-RabS.CookM. A. E. (2011). College students in changing contexts. In AltbachP. G.GumportP. J.BerdhalR. O. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty- first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (3rd ed., pp. 254–278). The John Hopkins University Press.
20.
HamrickF. A. (1998). Democratic citizenship and student activism. Journal of College Student Development, 39(5), 11.
21.
HillygusD. S. (2005). The missing link: Exploring the relationship between higher education and political engagement. Political Behavior, 27(1), 25–47.
22.
HubermanA. M.MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). SAGE.
23.
JenkinsH.ItoM.BoydD. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
JenningsM. K.AndersenE. A. (2003). The importance of social and political context: The case of AIDS activism. Political Behavior, 25(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023851930080
25.
JohnstonH.KlandermansB. (1995). The cultural analysis of social movements. Social Movements and Culture, 4, 3–24.
26.
KiddP. S.ParshallM. B. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118453
27.
LeiningerM. M. (Ed.). (1985). Qualitative research methods in nursing. WB Saunders Company.
28.
LinderC.QuayeS. J.LangeA. C.EvansM. E.StewartT. J. (2019). Identity-based student activism: Power and oppression on college campuses. Routledge.
29.
LinderC.QuayeS. J.StewartT. J.OkelloW. K.RobertsR. E. (2019). “The whole weight of the world on my shoulders”: Power, identity, and student activism. Journal of College Student Development, 60(5), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0048
30.
McAdamD. (1999). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
31.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
32.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
33.
MeyerD. S.StaggenborgS. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–1660.
34.
MorganD. L. (1996). Focus groups as qualitative research (Vol. 16). SAGE.
35.
MorganD. L.ZilvinskisJ.DuganB. (2019). Opening the activism and postsecondary education Black box: Relating high-impact practices and student identity with activist behaviors. Journal of Political Science Education, 17, 55–78.
36.
MorrisA. D. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement. Simon and Schuster.
37.
MorrisA. D.StaggenborgS. (2004). Leadership in social movements. InSnowD.SouleS.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 171–96). Blackwell.
38.
NiemiR. G.HanmerM. J. (2010). Voter turnout among college students: New data and a rethinking of traditional theories. Social Science Quarterly, 91(2), 301–323.
39.
OzymyJ. (2012). The poverty of participation: Self-interest, student loans, and student activism. Political Behavior, 34(1), 103–116.
40.
PlattM. B. (2008). Participation for what? A policy-motivated approach to political activism. Political Behavior, 30(3), 391–413.
41.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
ReyesD. V. (2015). Inhabiting Latino Politics: How Colleges Shape Students’ Political Styles. Sociology of Education, 88(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715602753
44.
RhoadsR. A. (1998). In the service of citizenship. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(3), 277–297.
45.
RhoadsR. A. (2016). Student activism, diversity, and the struggle for a just society. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(3), 189–202.
46.
RojasF. (2010). From Black power to Black studies: How a radical social movement became an academic discipline. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.140
47.
RubinI.RubinH. J. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage Publications.
48.
SaltmarshJ.HartleyM. (Eds.). (2011). “To serve a larger purpose”: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education. Temple University Press.
49.
SchaieK. W. (1978). Toward a stage theory of adult cognitive development. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8(2), 129–138.
50.
SmetsK. (2012). A widening generational divide? The age gap in voter turnout through time and space. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 22(4), 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.728221
51.
SouleS. A. (1999). The diffusion of an unsuccessful innovation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 120–131.
52.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
53.
TarrowS. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
54.
TaylorS. J.BogdanR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meaning. Wiley.
55.
TaylorV. (1989). Sources of continuity in social movements: The women’s movement in abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54, 761–775.
56.
TaylorV.RuppL. (1987). Survival in the doldrums: The American women’s rights movement, 1945 to the 1960s. Oxford University Press.
57.
TaylorV.Van DykeN. (2004). ‘Get up, stand up’: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS.KriesiH. (eds.) Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 262–93). Blackwell Publishing Company.
58.
ThomasN.BrowerM. T (2017). Politics 365: Fostering campus climates for student political learning and engagement. In McCartneyB. (Ed.), Teaching civic engagement across the disciplines in the twenty-first century (pp. 361–374). Matto & Simpson.
59.
ThomasN.BrowerM. T (2018). Conceptualizing and assessing campus climates for political learning and engagement in democracy. Journal of College and Character, 19(4), 247–263.
60.
Van DykeN. (1998). Hotbeds of activism: Locations of student protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097244
61.
Van DykeN. (2003). Crossing movement boundaries: Factors that facilitate coalition protest by American college students, 1930–1990. Social Problems, 50(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.226
62.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
63.
VerhulstJ.WalgraveS. (2009). The first time is the hardest? A cross-national and cross- issue comparison of first-time protest participants. Political Behavior, 31(3), 455–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9083-8
64.
WestonC.GandellT.BeauchampJ.McAlpineL.WisemanC.BeauchampC. (2001). Analyzing interview data: The development and evolution of a coding system. Qualitative Sociology, 24(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010690908200
65.
WhiteK. (2016). Black lives on campuses matter: Reflecting on the rise of the new Black student movement. Soundings, 63(63), 86–97
66.
ZhaoD. (1998). Ecologies of social movements: Student mobilization during the 1989 prodemocracy movement in Beijing. American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), 1493–1529. https://doi.org/10.1086/231399
67.
ZunigaX.WilliamsE. A.BergerJ. B. (2005). Action-oriented democratic outcomes: The impact of student involvement with campus diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 660–678.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
