Colleges and universities have implemented a broad range of initiatives to support student success. Problem solving courses and course supplements are one approach. Evaluation of these courses has shown positive outcomes in terms of improved academic performance and other benefits. A number of these studies have also reported the largest positive effects with underperforming student groups. To further explore this approach a novel general education academic success course was developed. The course integrated a comprehensive problem-solving model into lectures and assignments as the basis of an active learning instructional strategy. Students were taught the model along with relevant academic skills content. They then applied the model to a personal challenge affecting their success in school and life. Using a matched cohort design, 826 course participants were compared with a campus-wide sample matched on key variables. Generalized linear models were used to estimate between group mean differences, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare time to graduation. Results showed that students who successfully completed the course achieved higher cumulative GPAs overall compared with matched peers. Highest GPAs for students who took the course as freshmen suggested a transfer of knowledge over time. Results also showed that the course significantly benefited students from historically at-risk populations in terms of higher GPAs, units earned, retention, and graduation rates. This study shows that a well designed problem solving course can help students, especially those who struggle academically, to more effectively meet the challenges of college and daily life.
AllenJRobbinsSBCasillasA, et al. (2008) Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education49: 647–64.
2.
AllenSJGradenJL (2002) Best practices in collaborative problem solving for intervention design. In: ThomasAEGrimesJE (eds) Best Practices in School Psychology IV. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists, pp.565–82.
3.
ArmbrusterPPatelMJohnsonE, et al. (2009) Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Science Education8: 203–13.
4.
ArumRRoksaJ (2011) Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman.
6.
BeichnerRJSaulJMAbbottDS, et al. (2007) The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. Research-Based Reform of University Physics1(1): 2–39.
7.
BerzenskiSR (2021) The when and who of graduation and dropout predictors: A moderated hazard analysis. Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory and Practice23: 768–92.
8.
BillingD (2007) Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills. Higher Education53(4): 483–516.
9.
BoundJLovenheimMFTurnerS (2012) Increasing time to baccalaureate degree in the United States. Education Finance and Policy7(4): 375–424.
10.
BowenWKurzweilMTobinE (2005) Equity and Excellence in American Higher Education. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
11.
BrehmerB (1995) Feedback delays in complex dynamic decision tasks. In: FrenschPFunkeJ (eds) Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective 103–30. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
BurkeA (2016) Learning Life. San Francisco, CA: Rainor Media.
13.
BurkeAHassettS (2020) Evaluating an instructional resource used for teaching and learning meditation: A pilot study. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement4(4): 412–21.
14.
CariniRMKuhGDKleinSP (2006) Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education47(1): 1–32.
15.
CarnevaleAPVan Der WerfM (2017) The 20% Solution: Selective Colleges Can Afford to Admit More Pell Grant Recipients. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Available at: https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/pell20 (accessed 11 October 2021).
16.
CastlemanBGoodmanJ (2018) Intensive college counseling and the enrollment and persistence of low-income students. Education Finance and Policy13(1): 19–41.
17.
ChenR (2012) Institutional characteristics and college student dropout risks: A multilevel event history analysis. Research in Higher Education53(5): 487–505.
18.
ChimkaJRReed-RhoadsTBarkerK (2007) Proportional hazards models of graduation. Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory and Practice9(2): 221–32.
19.
CulverKCBowmanNA (2020) Is what glitters really gold? A quasi-experimental study of first-year seminars and college student success. Research in Higher Education61(2): 167–96.
20.
DemingWE (2018) The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21.
DesJardinsSLAhlburgDAMcCallBP (1999) An event history model of student departure. Economics of Education Review18(3): 375–90.
22.
DikaSLD’AmicoMM (2016) Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching53(3): 368–83.
23.
DörnerDFunkeJ (2017) Complex problem solving: what it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology8: 1153.
24.
FreemanSO’ConnorEParksJW, et al. (2007) Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education6(2): 132–9.
25.
FrenschPAFunkeJ (2014) Complex Problem Solving: The European perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
26.
GagneRM (1970) The Conditions of Learning. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
27.
GunnCHearneSSibthorpeJ (2011) Right from the start: A rationale for embedding academic literacy skills in university courses. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice8(1): 70–80.
28.
HaakDCHilleRisLambersJPitreE, et al. (2011) Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science332(6034): 1213–6.
29.
HacheyACWladisCConwayK (2015) Prior online course experience and GPA as predictors of subsequent online STEM course outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education25: 11–7.
30.
HalpernDF (1998) Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist53(4): 449–55.
31.
HaskellRE (2000) Transfer of Learning: Cognition and Instruction. New York, NY: Elsevier.
32.
HaslAKretschmannJRichterD, et al. (2019) Investigating core assumptions of the “American Dream”: Historical changes in how adolescents’ socioeconomic status, IQ, and GPA are related to key life outcomes in adulthood. Psychology and Aging34(8): 1055–76.
33.
HauptmanAMMerisotisJP (1990) The College Tuition Spiral: An Examination of Why Charges Are Increasing. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
34.
HelsdingenASvan Den BoschKvan GogT, et al. (2010) The effects of critical thinking instruction on training complex decision making. Human Factors52(4): 537–45.
35.
HeppnerPPNealGWLarsonLM (1984) Problem-solving training as prevention with college students. The Personnel and Guidance Journal62(9): 514–9.
36.
HoraMT (2019) Beyond the Skills Gap: Preparing College Students for Life and Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
37.
ImaiM (1986) Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
38.
IshitaniTT (2003) A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education44(4): 433–49.
39.
IshitaniTTDesJardinsSL (2002) A longitudinal investigation of dropout from college in the United States. Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory and Practice4(2): 173–201.
40.
KallisonJMJrStaderDL (2012) Effectiveness of summer bridge programs in enhancing college readiness. Community College Journal of Research & Practice36(5): 340–57.
41.
KirpD (2019) The College Dropout Scandal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
LeeJS (2014) The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality?Educational Research Journal107(3): 177–85.
43.
MacArthurCAPhilippakosZAIanettaM (2015) Self-regulated strategy instruction in college developmental writing. Journal of Education & Psychology107(3): 855–67.
44.
MestreJPDufresneRJGeraceWJ, et al. (1993) Promoting skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching30(3): 303–17.
45.
MokherCGPark-GaghanTJSpencerH, et al. (2020) Institutional transformation reflected: Engagement in sensemaking and organizational learning in Florida’s developmental education reform. Innovative Higher Education45(1): 1–17.
46.
MontagueMWargerCMorganTH (2000) Solve it! Strategy instruction to improve mathematical problem solving. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice15(2): 110–6.
NettlesMTThoenyARGosmanEJ (1986) Comparative and predictive analyses of Black and White students’ college achievement and experiences. The Journal of Higher Education57(3): 289–318.
49.
NunezAMCuccaro-AlaminS (1998) First-Generation Students: Undergraduates Whose Parents Never Enrolled in Postsecondary Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
50.
PascarellaETPiersonCTWolniakGC, et al. (2004) First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education75(3): 249–84.
51.
PrinceM (2004) Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education93(3): 223–31.
52.
ReidRA (2006) Productivity and quality improvement: An implementation framework. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management1(1-2): 26–36.
53.
RichardsCSPerriMG (1978) Do self-control treatments last? An evaluation of behavioral problem solving and faded counselor contact as treatment maintenance strategies. Journal of Counseling Psychology25: 376–83.
54.
RobbinsSBAllenJCasillasA, et al. (2006) Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Education & Psychology98(3): 598–616.
55.
RobbinsSBLauverKLeH, et al. (2004) Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin130: 261–88.
56.
SchraderPGBrownSW (2008) Evaluating the first year experience: Students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Advanced Academics19(2): 310–43.
57.
SinghRMukhopadhyayK (2011) Survival analysis in clinical trials: Basics and must know areas. Perspectives in Clinical Research2(4): 145–8.
58.
StanichCAPelchMATheobaldEJ, et al. (2018) A new approach to supplementary instruction narrows achievement and affect gaps for underrepresented minorities, first-generation students, and women. Chemistry Education Research and Practice19(3): 846–66.
59.
StinsonJEMilterRG (1996) Problem-based learning in business education: Curriculum design and implementation issues. New Directions for Teaching and Learning1996(68): 33–42.
60.
TheobaldEJHillMJTranE, et al. (2020) Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(12): 6476–83.
61.
VogelSAHoltJKSligarS, et al. (2008) Assessment of campus climate to enhance student success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability21(1): 15–31.
62.
WeinsteinCEHusmanJDierkingDR (2000) Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In: BoekaertsMPintrichPRZeidnerM (eds) Handbook of Self-Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp.727–47.
WoodsDRHrymakANMarshallRR, et al. (1997) Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program. Journal of Engineering Education86(2): 75–91.
65.
YueHFuX (2017) Rethinking graduation and time to degree: A fresh perspective. Research in Higher Education58(2): 184–213.
66.
YurievENaiduSSchembriLS, et al. (2017) Scaffolding the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry: guiding novice students out of dead ends and false starts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice18(3): 486–504.
67.
ZimmermanBJ (1986) Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses?Contemporary Educational Psychology11(4): 307–13.
68.
ZimmermanBJBanduraAMartinez-PonsM (1992) Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal29: 663–76.
