This Policy Discourse Analysis (PDA) explores 19 state legislative documents focused on the teaching of disability history in K-12 schools. Framed through critical perspectives on constructions of disability and race, alongside discourse theory, we iteratively analyzed these legislative documents to understand (a) how disability and disability history are constructed (particularly in relation to whiteness); and (b) the stated purpose of the legislation and who is meant to benefit materially as a result of the laws. We find the legislation upholds dominant notions of whiteness and ability as part of school curriculum, while simultaneously constructing disability history as in the past and disability justice as already achieved, centering the learning and awareness of white, nondisabled students. We offer discussion and implications for research and practice surrounding policy implementation of teaching disability history.
AllanE. J.TolbertA. R. (2019). Advancing social justice with policy discourse analysis. In StrunkK.LockeL. (Eds.), Research Methods for Social Justice and equity in Education (pp. 137–150). Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
AnnammaS.MorrisonD. (2018). DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80.
6.
AnnammaS. A. (2018). The pedagogy of pathologization: Dis/abled girls of color in the school-prison nexus. Routledge.
7.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Disability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and disability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.
8.
AnnammaS. A.HandyT. (2021). Sharpening justice through DisCrit: A contrapuntal analysis of education. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 41–50.
9.
ArtilesA. (2011). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational equity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability. Educational Researcher, 40(9), 431–445.
10.
AuW. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
11.
BaconJ. K.LalvaniP. (2019). Dominant narratives, subjugated knowledges, and the righting of the story of disability in K-12 curricula. Curriculum Inquiry, 49(4), 387–404.
12.
BagenstosS. R. (2009). Law and the contradictions of the disability rights movement. Yale University Press.
13.
BaglieriS.LalvaniP. (2019). Undoing ableism: Teaching about disability in K-12 classrooms. Routledge.
14.
BaxterJ. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
BayntonD. (2001). Disability and the justification of inequality in American history. In LongmoreP.UmanskyL. (Eds.), The new disability history: American perspectives (pp. 33–57). New York University Press.
16.
BellC. (2010). Is disability studies actually white disability studies. The Disability Studies Reader, 5, 402–410.
17.
BenekeM.R. (2021). Mapping socio-spatial constructions of normalcy: Whiteness and ability in teacher candidates’ educational trajectories. Whiteness and Education, 6(1), 92–113.
18.
BenekeM. R.CheathamG. A. (2020). Teacher candidates talking (but not talking) about dis/ability and race in preschool. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(3), 245–268.
19.
BenekeM. R.SkrticT. M.GuanC.HylandS.AnZ. G.AlzahraniT.LoveH. R. (2020). The mediating role of exclusionary school organizations in pre-service teachers’ constructions of inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(13), 1372–1388.
20.
BerneP.MoralesA. L.LangstaffD.InvalidS. (2018). Ten principles of disability justice. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 227–230.
21.
BertrandM.PerezW. Y.RogersJ. (2015). The covert mechanisms of education policy discourse: Unmasking policy insiders’ discourses and discursive strategies in upholding or challenging racism and classism in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(93), 1–35.
22.
BialkaC. S. (2017). Understanding the factors that shape dispositions toward students with disabilities: A case study of three general education pre-service teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(6), 616–636.
23.
BovedaM.ReyesG.AronsonB. (2019). Disciplined to access the general education curriculum: Girls of color, disabilities, and specialized education programming. Curriculum Inquiry, 49(4), 405–425.
24.
BrockM. E. (2018). Trends in the educational placement of students with intellectual disability in the United States over the past 40 years. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(4), 305–314.
25.
BroderickA. A.LeonardoZ. (2016). What a good boy: The deployment and distribution of “goodness” as ideological property in schools. In ConnorD. J.FerriB. A.AnnammaS. A. (Eds.), DisCrit: Disability studies and critical race theory in education (pp. 55–70). Teachers College Press.
26.
BurchS.SutherlandI. (2006). Who’s not yet here? American disability history. Radical History Review, 94, 127–147.
ConnorD.CavendishW.GonzalezT.Jean-PierreP. (2019). Is a bridge even possible over troubled waters? The field of special education negates the overrepresentation of minority students: A DisCrit analysis. Race Ethnicity & Education, 22(6), 723–745.
29.
ConnorD. J.ValleJ. W. (2017). Rescripting crips: Reclaiming disability history and a disability studies perspective within public school curriculum. In MusenbergO. (Ed.), Kulture-Geschichte-Behinderug/Culture, history, disability (pp. 201–220). Humbolt University Press.
30.
DanforthS. (2018). Becoming the rolling quads: Disability politics at the university of California, Berkeley, in the 1960s. History of Education Quarterly, 58(4), 506–536.
31.
Disability history & awareness month. N.C. Stat. Ann. Sec. 115C-81. (2007).
32.
Disability history and awareness, Fla. Stat. Ann. Sec. 1003.4205. (2008).
33.
Disability history and awareness; guidelines objectives, goals, Kan. Stat. Ann. Sec. 72-7538. (2009).
34.
Disability history and awareness instruction, Mo. Stat. Ann. Sec. 162.946. (2011).
35.
Disability history and awareness month, N.J. Stat. Ann. Sec. 36:2-221. (2013).
36.
DunnD.AndrewsE. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264.
37.
EllisJ.RousmaniereK. (2020). Professor Bailyn, meet Professor Baynton: The “new disability history” of education. History of Education Quarterly, 60(3), 285–294.
38.
ErevellesN. (2005). Understanding curriculum as normalizing text: Disability studies meet curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 421–439.
39.
ErevellesN.MinearA. (2010). Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability in discourses of intersectionality. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(2), 127–145.
40.
Establishing disability history week. W.Va. Stat. Ann. Sec 18-10O-5. (2006).
41.
FaircloughN.WodakR. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In van DijkT. A. (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (1st ed., pp. 258–284). SAGE.
42.
FerriB. A.ConnorD. J. (2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (Re)segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107(3), 453–474.
43.
FishR. E. (2019). Standing out and sorting in: Exploring the role of racial composition in racial disparities in special education. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2573–2608.
44.
FleischerD.ZamesF. D. (2012). The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation. Temple University Press.
45.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon.
46.
GeeJ. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.
47.
GildersleeveR. E.HernandezS. (2012). Producing im(possible) peoples: Policy discourse analysis, in-state resident tuition, and undocumented students in American higher education. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1–19. https://www.ijme-journal.org/index.php/ijme/article/view/517/745
48.
GillbornD. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505.
49.
GotandaN. (1991). A critique of “our constitution is color-blind”. Stanford Law Review, 44, 1–68.
Hernández-SacaD.CannonM. A. (2019). Interrogating disability epistemologies: Towards collective dis/ability intersectional emotional, affective and spiritual autoethnographies for healing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 243–262.
54.
Hernández-SacaD. I. (2019). Youth at the intersections of dis/ability, other markers of identity, and emotionality: Toward a critical pedagogy of student knowledge, emotion, feeling, affect, and being. Teachers College Record, 121(13), 1–16.
KohliR. (2019). Lessons for teacher education: The role of critical professional development in teacher of color retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(1), 39–50.
57.
Krueger-HenneyP. (2019). Through space into the flesh: Mapping inscriptions of anti-black racist and ableist schooling on young people’s bodies. Curriculum Inquiry, 49(4), 426–441.
58.
KudlickC. (2003). Disability history: Why we need another “other”. The American Historical Review, 108(3), 763–793.
59.
KumashiroK. K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 25–53.
60.
LalvaniP. (2015). “We are not aliens”: Exploring the meaning of disability and the nature of belongingness in a fourth grade classroom. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(4), n.p. https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4963
LeeE.MenkartD.Okazawa-ReyM. (1997). Beyond heroes and holidays: A practical guide to K-12 anti-tacist, multicultural education and staff development. Network of Educators on the Americas.
63.
LeonardoZ.BroderickA. A. (2011). Smartness as property: A critical exploration of intersections between whiteness and disability studies. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2206–2232.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) database. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/osepidea/618-data/state-level-data-files/index.html#bcc. See Digest of Education Statistics 2019, table 204.60.
75.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2020). Significant disproportionality in special education: Current trends and actions for impact. https://www.ncld.org/sigdispro/
76.
NielsenK. (2012). A disability history of the United States. Beacon Press.
NussbaumE. A.SteinbornM. L. (2019). A “visibilizing” project: “Seeing” the ontological erasure of disability in teacher education and social studies curricula. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 34(1), 24–35.
Ohio Stat. Ann. Sec. 5.234. (2016). To designate October as “Disability History and Awareness Month.”
81.
PattonM. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34, 1189–1208.
82.
Piepzna-SamarasinhaL. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.
83.
PutnamM. (2005). Conceptualizing disability: Developing a framework for political disability identity. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(3), 188–198.
ReidD. K.ValleJ. W. (2004). The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent-school relations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 466–481.
86.
RogersP. (2021). From racial equity to closing the achievement gap: The discursive “whiting out” of race in neoliberal education policy. In M. Sardoc (Ed.), The impacts of neoliberal discourse and language in education (pp. 191–205). Routledge.
87.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
88.
SchweikS. (2011). Lomax’s matrix: Disability, solidarity, and the Black power of 504. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(1), n.p. https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1371/1539
StoreyK. (2007). Combating ableism in schools. Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52(1), 56–58.
97.
TeferaA.Hernández-SacaD.LesterA. (2019). Troubling the master narrative of “grit”: Counterstories of Black and Latinx students with dis/abilities during an era of “high-stakes” testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(1), 1.
98.
TeferaA. A.FischmanG. E. (2021). How and why context matters in the study of racial disproportionality in special education: Toward a critical disability education policy approach. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(4), 433–448.
99.
Tex Stat. Ann. Sec. 662.109. (2011). Relating to designating October as Persons with disabilities history and awareness month
van DijkT. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
104.
VoulgaridesC. K. (2022). The promises and pitfalls of mandating racial equity in special education. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(6), 14–20.
105.
WaitollerF. R.King ThoriusK. A. (2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389.
106.
Wash. Rev. Code §28A.230.158. (2008). Disability history month –Activities.
