The “no excuses” charter school model is widely regarded in public debate as an effective policy intervention to politically and economically empower historically marginalized student populations. The organizing principle of the “no excuses” model is to do whatever it takes to close the achievement gap and to prepare students for university education and the professional job market. This article seeks to critically evaluate the “no excuses” model through a qualitative research synthesis of an emerging body of qualitative research literature. The findings from this synthesis raise serious questions about the desirability of the “no excuses” charter school model.
AndersonG. (2017). How education researchers have colluded in the rise of neoliberalism: What should the role of academics be in these Trumpian times?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(10), 1006–1012.
2.
AngristJ. D.DynarskiS. M.KaneT. J.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2012). Who benefits from KIPP?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 837–860.
3.
AnyonJ. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67–92.
4.
AnyonJ. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42.
5.
Ben-PorathS. (2013). Deferring virtue: The new management of students and the civic role of schools. School Field, 11(2), 111–128.
6.
BernsteinB. (1975). Class, codes, and control: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. Schocken Books.
7.
BourdieuP. (1974). The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities. In DgglestonJ. (Ed.), Contemporary research in the sociology of education (pp. 32–46). Cambridge University Press.
8.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. SAGE.
9.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.
10.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1988). Schooling in capitalist America: Reply to our critics. In ColeM. (Ed.), Bowles and Gintis revisited: Correspondence and contradiction in educational theory (pp. 235–245). The Falmer Press.
11.
BuchananJ. M. (2003). Public choice: Politics without romance [Article reprinted from Imprimus, March 2003]. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 19(3), 13–18.
12.
CrossF. (2017). Teacher shortage areas nationwide listing 1990-1991 through 2017-2018. U.S. Department of Education Office of Postsecondary Education.
13.
Debray-PelotE.McGuinnP. (2009). The new politics of education: Analyzing the federal education policy landscape in the post-NCLB era. Educational Policy, 23(1), 15–42.
14.
DishonG.GoodmanJ. F. (2017). No-excuses for character: A critique of character education in no-excuses charter schools. Theory and Research in Education, 15(2), 182–201.
15.
DuckworthA. L.SeligmanM. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944.
16.
DumasM. J.AndersonG. (2014). Qualitative research as policy knowledge: Framing policy problems and transforming education from the ground up. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(11). https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1483
17.
EllisonS. (2012). It’s in the name: A synthetic inquiry of the Knowledge is Power Program [KIPP]. Educational Studies, 48(6), 550–575.
18.
FinnC. E.SousaD. A. (2014). What lies ahead for America’s children and their schools. Hoover Institution Press.
19.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Random House.
20.
FriedmanM. (2009). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.
21.
FryerR. G.Jr. (2014). Injecting charter school best practices into traditional public schools: Evidence from field experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1355–1407.
22.
GirouxH. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin & Garvey.
23.
*GolannJ. W. (2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 103–119.
24.
*GolannJ. W. (2018). Conformers, adaptors, imitators, and rejecters: How no-excuses teachers’ cultural toolkits shape their responses to control. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 28–45.
25.
*GolannJ. W.TorresA. C. (2018). Do no-excuses disciplinary practices promote success?Journal of Urban Affairs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1427506
26.
GoodmanJ. F. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price?Educational Researcher, 42(2), 89–96.
27.
*GrahamE. J. (2017). “In real life, you have to speak up”: The civic significance of no-excuses classroom management practices. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
28.
GuggenheimD.KimballB. (2011). Waiting for “superman.” Paramount Home Entertainment.
29.
HeaddenS. (2006). Two guys and a dream. U.S. News & World Report, 140(6), 41–42, 4–46.
30.
HernándezL. E. (2016). Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(103). https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2321
31.
HorkheimerM.AdornoT. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. Herder & Herder.
32.
HornJ. (2016). Work hard, be hard: Journeys through “no excuses” teaching. Rowman & Littlefield.
KerstetterK. (2016). A different kind of discipline: Social reproduction and the transmission of non-cognitive skills at an urban charter school. Sociological Inquiry, 86(4), 512–539.
KrowkaS.HaddA.MarxR. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools for increasing math and literacy achievement in primary and secondary education: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13, 1–67. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.9
37.
LackB. (2009). No excuses: A critique of the knowledge is power program (KIPP) within charter schools in the USA. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7. http://www.jceps.com/archives/614
38.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
39.
LefebvreE.ThomasM. A. M. (2017). Shit shows or like-minded schools: Charter schools and the neoliberal logic of Teach for America. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 357–371.
40.
LemovD. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college. Jossey-Bass.
41.
MarshL. T. S.NogueraP. A. (2017). Beyond stigma and stereotypes: An ethnographic study on the effects of school-imposed labeling on Black males in an urban charter school. Urban Review, 50(3), 447–477.
42.
MajorC. H.Savin-BadenM. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. Routledge.
43.
MathewsJ. (2009). Work hard. Be nice: How two inspired teachers created the most promising schools in America. Algonquin Books.
44.
MillsC. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
45.
MironG.UrschelJ. L.SaxtonN. (2011). What makes KIPP work? A study of student characteristics, attrition, and school finance [Report]. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education. http://ncspe.tc.columbia.edu/working-papers/OP195_3.pdf
46.
MirowskiP.PlehweD. (Eds.). (2015). The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective, with a new preface. Harvard University Press.
47.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Number and percentage distribution of public elementary and secondary students and schools, by traditional or charter school status and selected characteristics: Selected years, 2000-01 through 2015-16. Federal Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_216.30.asp?currentyes
48.
National Center on Education and the Economy. (2008). Touch choices or tough times: The report of the new commission on the skills of the American workforce. Jossey-Bass.
49.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
50.
ScottJ. (2013a). School choice and the empowerment imperative. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(1), 60–73.
51.
ScottJ. T. (2013b). A Rosa Parks moment? School choice and the marketization of civil rights. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 5–18.
52.
SeligmanM. E. P.ReivichK.JaycoxL.GillhamJ. (2007). The optimistic child: A proven program to safeguard children against depression and build lifelong resilience. Houghton Mifflin.
53.
*SondelB. (2015a). Raising citizens or raising test scores? Teach for America, “no excuses” charters, and the development of the neoliberal citizen. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(3), 289–313.
54.
*SondelB. (2015b). Market-based pedagogies: Assessment, instruction, and purpose at a “no excuses” charter school. In MironL.BeaboutB. R.BoselovicJ. L. (Eds.), Only in New Orleans: School choice and equity post-hurricane Katrina (pp. 109–128). Sense Publishers.
55.
*SondelB. (2016). “No excuses” in New Orleans: The silent passivity of neoliberal schooling. The Educational Forum, 80(2), 171–188.
56.
ThompsonE. (1964). The making of the English working class. Pantheon Books.
57.
*TorresA. C. (2014). “Are we architects or construction workers?” Re-examining teacher autonomy and turnover in charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22. https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1614
58.
*TorresA. C. (2016). Teacher efficacy and disciplinary expectations in charter schools: Understanding the link to teachers’ career decisions. Journal of School Choice, 10(2), 171–199.
59.
*TorresA. C.WeinerJ. (2018). The new professionalism? Charter teachers’ experiences and qualities of the teaching profession. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(19). https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3049
60.
ToughPaul. (2006). What it takes to make a student. (Magazine) (George W. Bush on poor children education). The New York Times Magazine, 44.
61.
TuttleC. C.GillB.GleasonP.KnechtelV.Nichols-BarrerI.ReschA. (2013). KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes [Final report]. Mathematica Policy Research.
62.
Vasquez HeiligJ.WilliamsA.McNeilL. M.LeeC. (2011). Is choice a panacea? An analysis of Black secondary student attrition from KIPP, other private charters, and urban districts. Berkeley Review of Education, 2(2), 153–178.
63.
WhitmanD. (2008). Sweating the small stuff: Inner-city schools and the new paternalism. Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute.
64.
WillisP. (1981). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Gower.
65.
WoodworthK. R.DavidJ. L.GuhaR.WangH.Lopez-TorkosA. (2008). San Francisco bay area KIPP schools: A study of early implementation and achievement, final report. SRI International.
