The proliferation of urban “no-excuses” charter schools has been justified by arguing that Black and Latinx parents want strict discipline. In this article, we examine what discipline means to Black and Latinx families at two popular choice options: a no-excuses charter and two public Montessori magnets. We found that parents viewed discipline as more than rule-following, valuing also self-discipline and academic discipline. While no-excuses parents supported an orderly environment, many found the discipline restrictive. Parents in the Montessori schools, by contrast, praised student autonomy but questioned whether the freedom was preparing their students academically. Our findings reveal a gap between what Black and Latinx parents want and what choice schools and local school choice markets have on offer.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
3.
AngristJ. D.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2011). Explaining charter school effectiveness (NBER Working Paper No. 17332). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17332
4.
AnsariA.WinslerA. (2014). Montessori public school pre-K programs and the school readiness of low-income Black and Latino children. Journal of Education Psychology, 106, 1066–1079.
5.
AnyonJ. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162, 67–92.
BauchP. A. (1993). Improving education for minority adolescents: Toward an ecological perspective on school choice and parent involvement. In ChavkinN. F. (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 121–146). Albany: State University of New York Press.
10.
BaumrindD. (1972). An exploratory study of socialization effects on black children: Some black-white comparisons. Child Development, 43, 261–267.
11.
Ben-PorathS. (2013). Deferring virtue: The new management of students and the civic role of schools. Theory and Research in Education, 11, 111–128.
12.
BernsteinB. B. (1971). Class, codes and control. London, England: Routledge.
13.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America (Vol. 57). New York, NY: Basic Books.
14.
Brooks-GunnJ.MarkmanL. B. (2005). The contribution of parenting to ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 15, 139–168.
15.
BrownE.MakrisM. (2018). A different type of charter school: In prestige charters, a rise in cachet equals a decline in access. Journal of Education Policy, 33, 85–117.
16.
BrownK.LewisC. W. (2017). A comparison of reading and math achievement for African American third grade students in Montessori and other magnet schools. Journal of Negro Education, 86, 439–448.
17.
BrownK.SteeleA. (2015). Racial discipline disproportionality in Montessori and traditional public schools: A comparative study using the relative rate index. Journal of Montessori Research, 1, 14–27.
18.
CalarcoJ. M. (2011). “I need help!” Social class and children’s help-seeking in elementary school. American Sociological Review, 76, 862–882.
19.
CalarcoJ. M. (2014). Coached for the classroom parents’ cultural transmission and children’s reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79, 1015–1037.
CalzadaE. J.FernandezY.CortesD. E. (2010). Incorporating the cultural value of respeto into a framework of Latino parenting. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 77–86.
CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24.
ChengA.HittC.KisidaB.MillsJ. N. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 11, 209–238.
25.
ChubbJ. E.MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
CollierP. J.MorganD. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55, 425–446.
27.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
CucchiaraM.HorvatE. (2009). Perils and promises: Middle-class parental involvement in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 974–1004.
29.
DebsM. (2016). Racial and economic diversity in U.S. public Montessori schools. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(2), 15–34.
30.
DebsM. (2019). Diverse parents, desirable schools: Public Montessori in the era of school choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
DelpitL. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.
33.
DiamondA.LeeK. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333, 959–964.
34.
DobbieW.FryerR. G. (2011). Getting beneath the veil of effective schools: Evidence from New York City (Working Paper No. 17632). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17632
35.
DobbieW.FryerR. G. (2015). The medium-term impacts of high-achieving charter schools. Journal of Political Economy, 123, 985–1037.
36.
DohrmannK. R.NishidaT. K.GartnerA.LipskyD. K.GrimmK. J. (2007). High school outcomes for students in a public Montessori program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 205–217.
37.
Domènech RodriguezM. M.DonovickM. R.CrowleyS. L. (2009). Parenting styles in a cultural context: Observations of “protective parenting” in first-generation Latinos. Family Process, 48, 195–210.
38.
DuckworthA. L.GendlerT. S.GrossJ. J. (2014). Self-control in school-age children. Educational Psychologist, 49, 199–217.
39.
DurkheimÉ. (1961). Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. New York, NY: Free Press.
40.
FabricantM.FineM. (2012). Charter schools and the corporate makeover of public education: What’s at stake?New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
41.
FarrellC.WohlstetterP.SmithJ. (2012). Charter management organizations: An emerging approach to scaling up what works. Educational Policy, 26, 499–532.
42.
FineS. M. (2017). Struggling toward humanization: Restorative justice, deeper learning, and the pursuit of transformed relationships at an urban charter school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
43.
FinnC. E.Jr.MannoB. V.VanourekG. (2001). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
FinnJ. D.RockD. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.
45.
FinnJ. D.ServossT. J. (2014). Misbehavior, suspensions, and security measures in high school: Racial/ethnic and gender differences. Journal of Applied Research on Children, 5(2), 11.
46.
FriedmanB. A.BobrowskiP. E.GeraciJ. (2006). Parents’ school satisfaction: Ethnic similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 471–486.
47.
FullerH. (2005). Black power: The struggle for parental choice in education. In ConradC.WhiteheadJ.MasonP.StewartJ. (Eds.), African Americans in the US economy (pp. 281–287). Oxford, England: Roman & Littlefield.
48.
FurgesonJ.GillB.HaimsonJ.KillewaldA.McCulloughM.Nichols-BarrerI.. . . LakeR. (2012). Charter-school management organizations: Diverse strategies and diverse student impacts. Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED528536
49.
GolannJ. W. (2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88, 103–119.
GolannJ. W. (2018). Conformers, adaptors, imitators, and rejecters: How no-excuses teachers’ cultural toolkits shape their responses to control. Sociology of Education, 91, 28–45.
52.
GolannJ. W.TorresA. C. (2018). Do no-excuses disciplinary practices promote success?Journal of Urban Affairs. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1427506
53.
GoodmanJ. F. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price?Educational Researcher, 42, 89–96.
54.
HenryK. L.DixsonA. D. (2016). “Locking the door before we got the keys”: Racial realities of the charter school authorization process in post-Katrina New Orleans. Educational Policy, 30(1), 218–240.
55.
JulianT. W.McKenryP. C.McKelveyM. W. (1994). Cultural variations in parenting: perceptions of Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, and Asian-American parents. Family Relations, 43, 30–37.
56.
KarpM. J. M.BorkR. J. H. (2012). “They never told me what to expect, so I didn’t know what to do”: Defining and clarifying the role of a community college student. Teachers College Record, 116(5), 1–40.
57.
KendiI. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. New York, NY: Nation Books.
KretchmarK.SondelB.FerrareJ. J. (2014). Mapping the terrain: Teach for America, charter school reform, and corporate sponsorship. Journal of Education Policy, 29, 742–759.
60.
LacoeJ. R. (2015). Unequally safe: The race gap in school safety. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13, 143–168.
61.
LakeR.DusseaultB.BowenM.DemerittA.HillP. (2010). The national study of charter management organization (CMO) effectiveness: Report on interim findings. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED516865
LamboyL.LuA. (2017). The pursuit of college for all: Ends and means in “no excuses” charter schools. Theory and Research in Education, 15, 202–229.
64.
LareauA. (2001). Linking Bourdieu’s concept of capital to the broader field. In BiddleB. J. (Ed.), Social class, poverty, and education (pp. 77–100). London, England: Routledge.
65.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
66.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
67.
LillardA.Else-QuestN. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313, 1893–1894.
68.
LillardA. S.HeiseM. J.RicheyE. M.TongX.HartA.BrayP. M. (2017). Montessori preschool elevates and equalizes child outcomes: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1783.
69.
LosenD. J. (Ed.). (2014). Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
70.
MakrisM. V. (2015). Public housing and school choice in a gentrified city. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
MurrayA. (2008). Public perceptions of Montessori education (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Kansas, Lawrence.
74.
NolanK. (2011). Police in the hallways: Discipline in an urban high school. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
75.
PattilloM. (2015). Everyday politics of school choice in the black community. Du Bois Review, 12(01), 41–71.
76.
PattonM. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
77.
Pew Research Center. (2015). Parenting in America: Outlook, worries, aspirations are strongly linked to financial situation. Washington, DC: Author.
78.
Posey-MaddoxL. (2014). When middle-class parents choose urban schools: Class, race and the challenge of equity in public education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
RathundeK.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2005). The social context of middle school: Teachers, friends, and activities in Montessori and traditional school environments. Elementary School Journal, 106, 59–79.
80.
RhodesA.DeLucaS. (2014). Residential mobility and school choice among poor families. In GoyetteK.LareauA. (Eds.), Choosing homes, Choosing schools (pp. 137–166). New York: Russell Sage.
81.
Riley Institute. (2017). An evaluation of Montessori education in South Carolina’s public schools. Greenville, SC: Furman University.
82.
RoeserR. W.EcclesJ. S.SameroffA. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.
83.
RossS. M.McDonaldA. J.AlbergM.McSparrin-GallagherB. (2007). Achievement and climate outcomes for the Knowledge is Power Program in an inner-city middle school. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 137–165.
84.
RubinA.BabbieE. R. (2016). Empowerment series: Research methods for social work. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
85.
SchneiderM.MarschallM.TeskeP.RochC. (1998). School choice and culture wars in the classroom: What different parents seek from education. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 489–501.
86.
ScottJ. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23, 106–136.
87.
ServossT. J.FinnJ. D. (2014). School security: For whom and with what results?Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13, 61–92.
88.
SheddC. (2015). Unequal city: Race, schools, and perceptions of injustice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
89.
SmallM.L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
90.
SmrekarC. (1996). The impact of school choice and community: In the interest of families and schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
91.
SmrekarC.HoneyN. (2015). The desegregation aims and demographic contexts of magnet schools: How parents choose and why siting policies matter. Peabody Journal of Education, 90, 128–155.
92.
SondelB. (2016). “No excuses” in New Orleans: The silent passivity of neoliberal schooling.” The Educational Forum, 80, 171–88.
93.
StittM. E. (2016, December). “No excuses”: Neoliberalism, black childhood, and the new school discipline. Paper presented at the “Cultural Sociology and Education” conference, Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education, Moscow, Russia.
94.
StreibJ. (2011). Class reproduction by four year olds. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 337–352.
TaylorR. J.ChattersL. M.TuckerM. B.LewisE. (1990). Developments in research on Black families: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 993–1014.
98.
TeskeP.FitzpatrickJ.KaplanG. (2007). Opening doors: How low-income parents search for the right school. Retrieved from Center for Reinventing Public Education: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495279.pdf
99.
ThernstromA. M.ThernstromS. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
100.
TorresA. C. (2014). Is this work sustainable? Teacher turnover and perceptions of workload in charter management organizations. Urban Education, 51, 891–914.
101.
ToughP. (2013). How children succeed. New York, NY: Random House.
102.
TuttleC. C.GillB.GleasonP.KnechtelV.Nichols-BarrerI.ReschA. (2013). KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Final report. Seattle, WA: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED540912
103.
TuttleC. C.GleasonP.KnechtelV.Nichols-BarrerI.BookerK.ChojnackiG.. . . GobleL. (2015). Understanding the effect of KIPP as it scales: Volume I, impacts on achievement and other outcomes (Mathematica Policy Research Reports). Seattle, WA: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/7d8e94c5e77a4a9c8bf09000d6cc4456.html
104.
TysonK. (2003). Notes from the back of the room: Problems and paradoxes in the schooling of young black students. Sociology of Education, 76, 326–343.
105.
Van VelsenJ. (1978 [1967]). The extended-case method and situational analysis. In EpsteinA. L. (Ed.), The craft of social anthropology (pp. 129–149). Delhi, India: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.
106.
WestM. R.KraftM. A.FinnA. S.MartinR. E.DuckworthA. L.GabrieliC. F.GabrieliJ. D. (2016). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 148–170.
107.
WhiteT. (2015). Demystifying whiteness in a market of ‘No Excuses’ corporate styled charter schools. In MayorgaE.PicowerB. (Eds.), What’s race got to do with it? How current school reform policy maintains racial and economic inequality (pp. 121–145). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
108.
WhitmanD. (2008). Sweating the small stuff: Inner-city schools and the new paternalism. Washington, DC: Fordham Institute.
109.
WhitmireR. (2016). The founders: Inside the revolution to invent (and reinvent) America’s best charter schools. New York, NY: 74 Media.
110.
WillieC.V. (1975). Oreo: A perspective on race and marginal men and women. New York, NY: Parameter Press.
WoodworthK. R.DavidJ. L.GuhaR.WangH.Lopez-TorkosA. (2008). San Francisco Bay Area KIPP schools: A study of early implementation and achievement: Final report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
113.
ZarybniskyE. M. (2010). A ray of light: A mixed-methods approach to understanding why parents choose Montessori education (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
