This study compares mathematics instructional practices in classrooms that do and do not contain students with high-incidence disabilities (HIDs). To do so, we examined a national data set of responses from kindergarten teachers about instructional practices. We do find that in classrooms with students with HIDs, teachers reported different frequencies of math activities as well as skills instruction. These differences depended on type of HID. There were no differences in the frequency of time spent on math, meaning that classrooms with and without students with HIDs reported the same amount of math instruction per week. Differences in these findings arose based on teacher qualifications. Implications for policy are discussed.
AizerA. (2008). Peer effects and human capital accumulation: The externalities of ADD. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w14354
2.
AvramidisE.BaylissP.BurdenR. (2000). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 277-293.
3.
BakkenJ. P.ObiakorF. E.RotatoriA. F. (2012). Behavioral disorders: Practice concerns and students with EBD (Vol. 23). Bradford, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
4.
BarrR.DreebenR. (1983). How schools work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BaxterJ. A.WoodwardJ.OlsonD. (2005). Writing in mathematics: An alternative form of communication for academically low-achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 119-135.
6.
BodovskiK.FarkasG. (2007). Do instructional practices contribute to inequality in achievement? The case of mathematics instruction in kindergarten. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5, 301-322.
7.
BottgeB. A. (1999). Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students. The Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 81-92.
8.
BottgeB. A.HeinrichsM.ChanS. Y.SerlinR. C. (2001). Anchoring adolescents’ understanding of math concepts in rich problem-solving environments. Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 299-314.
9.
BottgeB. A.HeinrichsM.MehtaZ. D.HungY. H. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 186-200.
10.
BottgeB. A.RuedaE.LaRoqueP. T.SerlinR. C.KwonJ. (2007). Integrating reform-oriented math instruction in special education settings. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 96-109.
11.
BottgeB. A.RuedaE.SerlinR. C.HungY. H.KwonJ. M. (2007). Shrinking achievement differences with anchored math problems: Challenges and possibilities. The Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 31-49.
12.
BruceC. D.RossJ. A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: Teacher peer coaching in grades 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31, 346-370.
13.
ByrnesJ. P.WasikB. A. (2009). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in kindergarten, first and third grades: An opportunity-propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 167-183.
14.
CawleyJ.HaydenS.CedeE.Baker-KroczynskiS. (2002). Including Students with disabilities into the general education science classroom. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 423-35.
15.
ChoR. M. (2012). Are there peer effects associated with having English Language Learner (ELL) classmates? Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K). Economics of Education Review, 31, 629-643.
16.
CipaniE. (1995). Inclusive education: What do we know and what do we still have to learn?Exceptional Children, 61, 498-500.
17.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics ofEducation Review, 26(6), 673-682.
18.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school a cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655-681.
19.
CohenD. K.BallD. L. (1990). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233-239.
20.
CollopyR. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287.
21.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence previous research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1-44.
22.
Darling-HammondL.HoltzmanD. J.GatlinS. J.HeiligJ. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42).
23.
DentonK.WestJ. (2002). Children’s reading and mathematics achievement in kindergarten and first grade.
24.
DreebenR.BarrR. (1988). Classroom composition and the design of instruction. Sociology of Education, 61, 129-142.
25.
DreebenT.GamoranA. (1986). Race, instruction, and learning. American Sociological Review, 51, 660-669.
26.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. . . JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428-1446.
27.
DunnC.RabrenK. S.TaylorS. L.DotsonC. K. (2012). Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 47-54.
28.
DurlakJ. A.WeissberegR. P.DymnickiA. BTaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405-432.
29.
FletcherJ. M. (2010). Spillover effects of inclusion of classmates with emotional problems on test scores in early elementary school. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29, 69-83.
30.
GageN. A.LierheimerK. S.GoranL. G. (2012). Characteristics of students with high-incidence disabilities broadly defined. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(3), 168-178.
31.
GottfriedM. A. (2014). Classmates with disabilities and students’ non-cognitive outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 20-43.
32.
GottfriedM. A.EgaliteA.KirkseyJ. (2016). Does the presence of a classmate with emotional/behavioral disabilities link to other students’ absences in kindergarten?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 506-520.
33.
GreeneJ. P.WintersM. A. (2007). Debunking a special education myth: Don’t blame private options for rising costs. Education Next, 7(2), 67.
34.
GrusecJ. E.GoodnowJ. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4-19.
35.
GuarinoC.DieterleS. G.BargagliottiA. E.MasonW. M. (2013). What can we learn about effective early mathematics teaching? A framework for estimating causal effects using longitudinal survey data. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 164-198.
36.
HallinanM. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67, 79-84.
37.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2002). Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities?Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 584-599.
38.
HarrisD. N.SassT. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of public economics, 95(7), 798-812.
39.
HenryG. T.BastianK. C.FortnerC. K. (2011). Stayers and leavers: Early-career teacher effectiveness and attrition. Educational Researcher, 40, 271-280.
40.
HenryG. T.FortnerC. K.BastianK. C. (2012). The effects of experience and attrition for novice high-school science and mathematics teachers. Science, 335, 1118-1121.
41.
HorstmeierD. (2004). Teaching Math to People with Down Syndrome and other Hands-On Learners: Basic Survival Skills (Topics in Down syndrome). Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House
42.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850-867.
43.
LazearE. P. (2001). Educational production. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 777-803.
44.
MacciniP.StricklandT.GagnonJ. C.MalmgrenK. W. (2008). Accessing the general education math curriculum for secondary students with high incidence disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 40(8), 1-32.
45.
MaloneyM.ShenkerB. (1995). The continuing evolution of special education law: 1978 to 1995 (IDELR Special Report No 12). Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
46.
McLeskeyJ.LandersE.WilliamsonP.HoppeyD. (2012). Are we moving toward educating students with disabilities in less restrictive settings?The Journal of Special Education, 46, 131-140.
47.
MonkD. H.IbrahimM. A. (1984). Patterns of absence and pupil achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 295-310.
48.
NeidellM.WaldfogelJ. (2010). Cognitive and noncognitive peer effects in early education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 562-576.
49.
OlsonS. L.SameroffA.KerrD. C. R.LopezN. L.WellmanH. M. (2005). Developmental foundations of externalizing problems in young children: The role of effortful control. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 25-45.
50.
PastorP. N.ReubenC. A.DuranC. R. (2012). Identifying emotional and behavioral problems in children aged 4-17 years: United States, 2001-2007. National Health Statistics Reports, 1-17.
51.
RoystonP. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227-241.
52.
SlavinR. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In MayerRichard E.AlexanderPatricia A. (eds.) Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 358-374). Routledge.
53.
TauberR. T. (2007). Classroom management: Sound theory and effective practice. Portsmouth, NH: Greenwood Publishing Group.
54.
U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Inclusion of students with disabilities.
55.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Digest of education statistics, 2017 (NCES 2018-070).
56.
WentzelK. R. (2014). Socialization in school settings. In GrusecJoan E.HastingsPaul D. (eds.) Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 251-275). Guilford Press.
57.
WilsonM.LloydG. M. (2000). Sharing mathematical authority with students: The challenge for high school teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(2), 146-169.
