High school students with high-incidence disabilities and struggling writers face considerable challenges when taking writing assessments designed for college entrance. This study examined the effectiveness of a writing intervention for improving students’ performance on a college entrance exam, the writing assessment for the ACT. Students were taught a planning and composing strategy for successfully taking this test using the self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) model. A true-experiment was conducted where 20 high school students were randomly assigned to a treatment (n = 10) or control (n = 10) condition. Control students received ACT math preparation. SRSD instruction statistically enhanced students’ planning, the quality of their written text (including ideas and analysis, development and support, organization, and language use), the inclusion of argumentative elements in their compositions, and the use of transition words in written text. Limitations of the study, future research, and implications for practice are discussed.
FieldA. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: North American edition (5th ed.). SAGE.
7.
GewertzC. (2017, February8). Feds: States must make case for ACT. Education Week, p. 9.
8.
GrahamS.CollinsA. A.Rigby-WillsH. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916664070
9.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2014). Conducting high quality writing intervention research: Twelve recommendations. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.1
10.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.FinkB. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 620–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620
11.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.Fink ChorzempaB. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669
12.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.HebertM. (2011). It is more than just the message: Presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(4), 1–12.
13.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.McKeownD. (2013). The writing of students with LD and a meta-analysis of SRSD writing intervention studies: Redux. In SwansonL.HarrisK.R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 405–438). Guilford Press.
14.
HarrisK. R.RayA. B.GrahamS.HoustonJ. D. (2019). Answering the challenge: SRSD instruction for close reading of text to write to persuade with 4th and 5th grade Students experiencing writing difficulties. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(6), 1459–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9910-1
15.
JacobsonL. T.ReidR. (2010). Improving the persuasive essay writing of high school students with ADHD. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600202
16.
JacobsonL. T.ReidR. (2012). Improving the writing performance of high school students with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and writing difficulties. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 20(4), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.724624
17.
KiuharaS. A.O’NeileR.HawkenL.GrahamS. (2012). The effectiveness of teaching 10th grade students STOP, AIMS, and DARE for planning and drafting persuasive text. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800305
18.
MasonL. H.KubinaR.HooverT. (2013). Effects of quick writing instruction for high school students with emotional disturbances. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611410429
19.
OlinghouseN. G.GrahamG.GillespieA. (2015). The relationship of discourse and topic knowledge to fifth graders’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037549
20.
Psychological Corporation. (2009). WIAT-III: Wechsler Individual Achievement Test: Third edition.
21.
RayA. B.GrahamS.LiuX. (2019). Effects SRSD of college entrance essay exam instruction for high school students with disabilities or at-risk for writing difficulties. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(6), 1507–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9900-3
22.
TukeyJ. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
23.
U.S. Department of Education, & National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Students with disabilities. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=60
