Despite a growing body of turnover literature, much remains unknown about the factors predicting career transitional behaviors of school principals. To bridge this gap, we examined variations in principal, school, and district characteristics influencing administrator leaver and mover behaviors, using Hierarchical Generalized Linear Modeling. Our findings revealed that class size, support staff, parental involvement, teacher incentives, unionization, and many other district-level policies offset turnover, thereby contributing to retention. Furthermore, predictors of principal mover behavior differed from those of principal leaver behavior, suggesting that different forms of exit paths may need different policy tools to improve retention.
AbelsonM.BaysingerB. (1984). Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. The Academy of Management Review, 9, 331-341.
2.
AgrestaJ. (2004). Professional role perceptions of school social workers, psychologists, and counselors. Children & Schools, 26, 151-163.
3.
AsparouhovT. (2006). General multilevel modeling with sample weight. Communications in Statistics. 35, 439-460.
4.
BakerB.PunswickE.BeltC. (2010). School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: Evidence from Missouri. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 523-557.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
BarnesG.CroweE.SchaeferB. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
7.
BattleD.GruberK. (2010). Principal attrition and mobility: Results from the 2008-09 Principal Follow-Up Survey (NCES 2010-337). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
8.
BéteilleT.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41, 904-919.
9.
BowersA.WhiteB. (2014). Do principal preparation and teacher qualifications influence different types of school growth trajectories in Illinois? A growth mixture model analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 705-736.
10.
BoyceJ.BowersA. J. (2016). Principal turnover: Are there different types of principals who move from or leave their schools? A latent class analysis of the 2007–2008 Schools and Staffing Survey and the 2008–2009 Principal Follow-Up Survey. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15, 237-272.
11.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). Influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 303-333.
12.
BranchG. F.HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2012, January). Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals (Working Paper No. 17803). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
CampbellC.GrossB. (2008). Working without a safety net: How charter school leaders can best survive on the high wire. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.
15.
ChapmanJ. D. (2005). Recruitment, retention, and development of school principals. Paris, France: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning and the International Academy of Education.
16.
ChenK.BlendingerJ.McGrathV. (2000, November). Job satisfaction among high school principals in Mississippi. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Association, Bowling Green, KY.
17.
ChoiY.ChungH. (2016). Voice effects of public sector unions on turnover: Evidence from teacher contracts. Public Personnel Management, 45, 213-233.
18.
CoelliM.GreenA. (2012). Leadership effects: School principals and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 31, 92-109.
19.
CooleyV.ShenJ. (1999). Who will lead? The top 10 factors that influence teachers moving into administration. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 83(606), 75-80.
20.
Darling-HammondL.OrphanosS.LapointeM.WeeksS. (2007). Leadership development in California (Getting Down to Facts: Effectivness Studies Series). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice and the School Redesign Network.
21.
DayC.GuQ.SammosP. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 221-258.
22.
DeAngelisK. J.WhiteB. R. (2011). Principal turnover in Illinois public schools, 2001-2008 (Policy Research: IERC 2011-1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED518191
EbertsR.(1987). Union-negotiated employment rules and teacher quits. Economics of Education Review, 6, 15-25.
25.
EckmanE. (2004). Similarities and differences in role conflict, role commitment, and job satisfaction for female and male high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 366-387.
26.
EhrenbergR. G.BrewerD. J.GamoranA.WillmsJ. D. (2001). Does class size matter?Scientific American, 285, 78-85
27.
EpsteinJ. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 7, 701-712.
28.
FraserT. (1983). Human stress, work and job satisfaction: A critical approach. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
29.
FullerE.YoungM. (2009). Tenure and retention of newly hired principals in Texas. Austin: University Council for Educational Administration, The University of Texas at Austin.
30.
FullerE.YoungM.OrrT. ( 2007, April). Career paths of principals in Texas. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Research Association, Chicago, IL.
31.
GatesS.RingelJ.SantilbanezL.GuarinoC.Ghosh-DastidarB.BrownA. (2006). Mobility and turnover among school principals. Economics of Education Review, 25, 289-302.
32.
GatesS.RingelJ.SantilbanezL.RossK.ChungC. (2003). Who is leading our schools? An overview of school administrators and their careers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
GoldringR.TaieS. (2014). Principal attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012–13 Principal Follow-Up Survey (NCES 2014-064REV). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014064rev
35.
GrubbN.FlessaJ. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 518-550.
36.
HaleE.HunterM. (2003). Preparing school principals: A national perspective on policy and program innovations. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership; Edwardsville: Illinois Education Research Council.
HanusheckE.KeainJ.RivkinS. (2001, November). Why public schools lose teachers (NBER Working Paper No. 8599). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
HarrisS.ArnoldM.LoweryS.CrockerC. (2002). What factors motivate and inhibit women when deciding to become a principal? In KorcheckS.ReeseM. (Eds.), Women as school executives: Research and reflections on educational leadership (pp. 252-260). Austin: Texas Council of Women School Executives.
40.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2014). Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 653-681.
HochbeinC.CunninghamB. C. (2013). An exploratory analysis of the longitudinal impact of principal change on elementary school achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 23, 64-90.
43.
HoffmanD. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
44.
HomP. W.RobersonL.EllisA. D. (2008). Challenging conventional wisdom about who quits: Revelations from corporate America. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1-34.
JasP.SkelcherC. (2005). Performance decline and turnaround in public organizations: A theoretical and empirical analysis. British Journal of Management, 16, 195-210.
50.
JinnahH.WaltersL. (2008). Including parents in evaluation of a child development program: Relevance of parental involvement. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 10. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ848824.pdf
51.
JohnsonN.HoldawayE. (1994). Facet importance and the job satisfaction of school principals. British Educational Research Journal, 20, 17-33.
LiD. (2012). School accountability and principal mobility: How No Child Left Behind affects the allocation of school leaders. Unpublished manuscript.
54.
LochmillerC. R.AdachiE.ChesnutC. E.JohnsonJ. (2016). Retention, attrition, and mobility among teachers and administrators in West Virginia (REL 2016–161). Washington, DC: Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
55.
LoebS.KalogridesD.HorngE. (2010). Principal preferences and the uneven distribution of principals across schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 205-229.
MarksH.NanceJ. (2007). Contexts of accountability under systemic reform: Implications for principal influence on instruction and supervision. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 3-37.
58.
MarzanoR. J.McNultyB.WatersT. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
59.
MascallB.LeithwoodK. (2010). Investing in leadership: The district’s role in managing principal turnover. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 367-383.
60.
MayerG.2004. Union membership trends in the United States. Working paper.
61.
MitaniH. (2018). Principals’ working conditions, job stress, and turnover behaviors under NCLB Accountability pressure. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54, 822-862.
62.
MobleyW. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240.
63.
MollyH.MalloryB. (2006). Perceptions of Isolation among high school principals. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 6, 7-27.
64.
National Association of Elementary and Secondary Principals. (1998). Over fifty-percent of principals in America will retire in the next ten years. Principal, 70(4), 65.
65.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Characteristics of public, private, and Bureau of Indian Education elementary and secondary school principals in the United States: Results From the 2007–08 Schools and Staffing Survey. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1028.5626&rep=rep1&type=pdf
66.
NewtonR.GiesenJ.FreemanJ.BishopH.ZeitounP. (2003). Assessing the reactions of males and females to attributes of the principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 504-532.
67.
NirA. E.KranotN. (2006). School principal’s leadership style and teachers’ self-efficacy. Planning and Changing, 37, 205-218.
68.
OplatkaI. (2010). Principals in late career: Toward a conceptualization of principals’ tasks and experiences in the pre-retirement period. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 776-815.
69.
OplatkaI.TamirV. (2009). “I don’t want to be a school head”: Women deputy heads’ insightful constructions of career advancement and retention. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 216-238.
70.
PapaF. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 267-290.
PartlowM. C.RidenourC. S. (2008). Frequency of principal turnover in Ohio’s elementary schools. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 21(2), 15-16.
73.
PodsakoffN.LePineJ.LePineM. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438-454.
74.
PounderD.MerillR. (2001). Job desirability of the high school principalship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 27-57.
75.
PriceJ. (1994). The school administrator supply and demand report. Madison: Wisconsin State Department of Instruction, Bureau for Teacher Education, Licensing and Placement. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED369164.pdf
76.
ProtheroeN. (2008, May/June). Teacher efficacy: What is it and does it matter?Principal, Retrieved from http://www.naesp.org
77.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
78.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CheongY. F.CongdonR. T. (2004). HLM 7: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
79.
SandersW. L.RiversJ. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
SeatstromM. (2012). 2012 NCES statistical standards. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/statprog/2012
82.
ShakeshaftC. (1989). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
83.
TekleselassieA.VillarrealP.III. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10, 251-293.
TillmanL. (2003). From rhetoric to reality? Educational administration and the lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the profession. University Council for Educational Administration Review, 45(3), 1-4.
86.
VanderhaarJ. E.MuñozM. A.RodoskyR. J. (2006). Leadership as accountability for learning: The effects of school poverty, teacher experience, previous achievement, and principal preparation programs on student achievement. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 19(1-2), 17-33.
87.
WinterP. A.RinehartJ. S.MuñozM. A. (2002). Principal recruitment: An empirical evaluation of a school district’s internal pool of principal certified personnel. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 129-141.
