School choice research is abundant, but rarely incorporates students’ experiences or perspectives. This study investigates a diverse group of students’ school choice experiences as they applied to, gained admission to and enrolled in high school in Chicago Public Schools, which offers over 130 options. Adapting Ball and colleagues’ (2012) concept of policy actor positionality, we analyzed the role of students’ developmental and social statuses in students’ school choice experiences. Students’ policy encounters were developmentally consistent, but their admissions results and subsequent academic trajectories diverged by their socioeconomic status. We discuss these findings’ developmental and equity implications for school choice policy.
AllensworthE. M.MooreP. T.SartainL.de la TorreM. (2017). The educational benefits of attending higher performing schools: Evidence from Chicago high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 175-197.
3.
BaderM. D.WarkentienS. (2016). The fragmented evolution of racial integration since the civil rights movement. Sociological Science, 3, 135-166.
4.
BallS. J.MaguireM.BraunA. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BellC. A. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 191-208.
BettsJ.LovelessT. (2005). Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
8.
BlakemoreS. J.ChoudhuryS. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296-312.
9.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BrownL. E.KannyA.JohnsonB. (2014). “I am who I am because of here!”: School settings as a mechanism of change in establishing high-risk adolescents’ academic identities. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 178-205.
CarolanB. V.WeissC. C.MatthewsJ. S. (2015). Which middle school model works best? Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Youth & Society, 47, 591-614.
14.
Chicago Public Schools (CPS). (2011). Admissions policy for magnet, selective enrollment and other options for knowledge schools and programs. Chicago Public Schools policy manual. Retrieved from https://policy.cps.edu/download.aspx?ID=82
15.
Chicago Public Schools (CPS). (2013). 2013-2014 CPS high school guide. Chicago, IL: Office of Access and Enrollment, Chicago Public Schools.
16.
CondliffeB. F.BoydM. L.DeLucaS. M. (2015). Stuck in school: How social context shapes school choice for inner-city students. Teachers College Record, 117, 1-36.
17.
ConnerJ.Ebby-RosinR.BrownA. (2015). Introduction to student voice in American education policy. Teachers College Record, 117(13), 1-18.
18.
CordesS. A. (2017). In pursuit of the common good: The spillover effects of charter schools on public school students in New York City. Education Finance and Policy, 13, 484-512. doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00240
CrocettiE. (2017). Identity formation in adolescence: The dynamic of forming and consolidating identity commitments. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 145-150.
21.
CrocettiE.RubiniM.LuyckxK.MeeusW. (2008). Identity formation in early and middle adolescents from various ethnic groups: From three dimensions to five statuses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 983-996.
22.
CubanL. (2010). As Good as it Gets: What School Reform Brought to Austin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
CucchiaraM. (2013). “Are we doing damage?” Choosing an urban public school in an era of parental anxiety. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 44, 75-93.
24.
CucchiaraM. B.HorvatE. M. (2014). Choosing selves: The salience of parental identity in the school choice process. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 486-509.
25.
CullenJ. B.JacobB. A.LevittS. D. (2005). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 729-760.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 139-186.
28.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC.WigfieldA.BuchananC. M.ReumanD.FlanaganC.Mac IverD. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.
29.
EcclesJ. S.RoeserR. (2015). School and community influences on human development. In BornsteinM. H.LambM. E. (Eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (7th ed., pp. 645-728). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
30.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
34.
HolmeJ. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 177-206.
35.
ImbermanS. A. (2011). The effect of charter schools on achievement and behavior of public school students. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 850-863.
36.
KeatingD. P. (2004). Cognitive and brain development. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 45-84). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
KeganR. (1995). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
KimelbergS. M. (2014). Beyond test scores: Middle-class mothers, cultural capital, and the evaluation of urban public schools. Sociological Perspectives, 57, 208-228.
39.
LauenD. L. (2009). To choose or not to choose: High school choice and graduation in Chicago. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 179-199.
40.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
LynchM.CicchettiD. (1997). Children’s relationships with adults and peers: An examination of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 81-99.
43.
MannoB.FinnC. E.VanourekG. (1999). Charter schools: Serving disadvantaged youth. Education and Urban Society, 31, 429-445.
44.
Menefee-LibeyD. (2010). Neoliberal school reform in Chicago? Renaissance 2010, portfolios of schools, and diverse providers. In BulkleyK.HenigJ.LevinH. (Eds.), Between public and private: Politics, governance, and the new portfolio models for urban school reform (pp. 55-90). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
45.
MerriamS. B.Johnson-BaileyJ.LeeM. Y.KeeY.NtseaneG.MuhamadM. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20, 405-416.
46.
MidgleyC.FeldlauferH. (1987). Students’ and teachers’ decision-making fit before and after the transition to junior high school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 225-241.
47.
NasirN. S.SaxeG. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14-18.
48.
NathansonL.CorcoranS.Baker-SmithC. (2013). High school choice in New York City: A report on the school choices and placements of low-achieving students. New York: The Research Alliance for New York City Schools. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541824.pdf
49.
OysermanD.DestinM.NovinS. (2015). The context-sensitive future self: Possible selves motivate in context, not otherwise. Self and Identity, 14, 173-188.
50.
PattilloM.Delale-O’ConnorL.ButtsF. (2014). High-stakes choosing. In LareauA.GoyetteK. A. (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 237-267). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
PausT. (2005). Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 60-68.
52.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1973). Memory and intelligence. London, England: Routledge.
53.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
54.
PhillippoK. (2019). A contest without winners: Student experiences of competitive school choice policy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
55.
RhodesA.DeLucaS. (2014). Residential mobility and school choice among poor families. Choosing homes, choosing schools, 137-166.
56.
RodaA. (2015). Inequality in gifted and talented programs: Parental choices about status, school opportunity, and second-generation segregation. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
57.
RoeserR. W.LauS. (2002). On academic identity formation in middle school settings during early adolescence. In BrinthauptT.LipkaR. (Eds.), Understanding early adolescent self and identity: Applications and interventions (pp. 91-131). Albany: State University of New York Press.
58.
RyanR.DeciE. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
59.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
Salmela-AroK.KiuruN.NurmiJ. E. (2008). The role of educational track in adolescents’ school burnout: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 663-689.
61.
Sattin-BajajC. (2014). Unaccompanied minors: Immigrant youth, school choice, and the pursuit of equity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
62.
Sattin-BajajC.JenningsJ.HaileyC.Baker-SmithC.CohodesS.CorcoranS. (2016). “I can’t choose for them”: How school-level actors respond to the demands of high school choice. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
63.
Sattin-BajajC.RodaA. (2018). Opportunity hoarding in school choice contexts: The role of policy design in promoting middle-class parents’ exclusionary behaviors. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0895904818802106
64.
SegrinC.GivertzM.SwaitkowskiP.MontgomeryN. (2015). Overparenting is associated with child problems and a critical family environment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 470-479.
65.
SharkeyP. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
66.
SteinbergL. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
67.
StevensW. D.de La TorreM.JohnsonD. W. (2011). High school choice: Processes and outcomes in Chicago. In BerendsM.CannataM.GoldringE. (Eds.), School choice and school improvement (pp. 124-146). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
68.
TatumB. (2017). Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? And other conversations about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Van PetegemS.BeyersW.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2012). On the association between adolescent autonomy and psychosocial functioning: Examining decisional independence from a self-determination theory perspective. Developmental Psychology, 48, 76-88.
71.
YettickH. (2016). Information is bliss: Information use by school choice participants in Denver. Urban Education, 51(8), 859-890.
72.
YinR. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
