Given the increasingly global nature of marketized school choice policies, this makes it even more crucial to investigate how the multiple scales, forms, and emphases of school choice in different countries are influenced by particular political, economic, and cultural conditions. While much of the critical research on school choice policies has focused on examining the complex processes of school choice in the education market in Western contexts, this essay review of School Choice in China applies Bourdieu’s concepts of capital and conversion strategies to demonstrate the practices of market-based parental choice in China.The essay highlights the importance of the recontextualization of school choice within the Chinese historical, political, economic, and social landscape in order to better understand how choice policy is interpreted differently in the Chinese context. Such historical and social specificities include, but are not limited to, the Chinese government’s insufficient investment in education, the existing key school system, and significant social class changes in contemporary China.
AppleM. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18, 12-44.
2.
AppleM. W. (2006). Educating the “right” way: Market, standards, god, and inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AppleM. W. (Ed.). (2010). Global crises, social justice, and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
AppleM. W. (2013). Can education change society?New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
AppleM. W. (2014). Education and power (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
AppleM. W.AasenP.ChoM. K.GandinL. A.OliverA.SungY. K.WongT. (2003). The state and the politics of knowledge. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
7.
BallS. J. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34, 119-130.
8.
BallS. J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market: The middle class and social advantage. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BallS. J.BoweR.GewirtzS. (1995). Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. Sociological Review, 43, 52-78.
10.
BallS. J.VincentC. (1998). “I heard it on the grapevine”: “Hot” knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19, 377-400.
11.
BernsteinB. (1977). Class, codes and control, vol. 3: Towards a theory of educational transmissions. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
14.
BrownP. (2003). The opportunity trap: Education and employment in a global economy. European Educational Research Journal, 2, 141-179.
15.
BurasK.AppleM. (2005). School choice, neoliberal promises, and unpromising evidence. Educational Policy, 19, 550-564.
16.
ChubbJ. E.MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets and America’s schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
17.
ForseyM.DaviesS.WalfordG. (Eds.). (2008). The globalization of school choice?Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
18.
FriedmanM.FriedmanR. (1980). Free to choose: A personal statement. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
19.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
HenigJ. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
LauderH.HughesD. (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don’t work. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
22.
National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. (1986). Compulsory education law of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://law.lawtime.cn/d328153333247.html
OlssenM.CoddJ. A.O’NeillA. M. (2004). Education policy: Globalization, citizenship and democracy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
PlankD. N.SykesG. (Eds.). (2003). Choosing choice: School choice in international perspective. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
PowerS.WhittyG. (2006). Education and the middle class: A complex but crucial case for the sociology of education. In LauderH.BrownP.DillaboughJ. A.HalseyA. (Eds.), Education, globalization, and social change (pp. 446-453). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
RollockN.GillbornD.VincentC.BallS. (2014). The color of class: The educational strategies of the black middle classes. London, England: Routledge.
28.
WhittyG. (1997). Creating quasi-markets in education: A review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. Review of Research in Education, 22, 3-47.
29.
WhittyG.PowerS.HalpinD. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
30.
WuX. (2008). The power of positional competition and market mechanism: A case study of recent parental choice development in China. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 595-614.
31.
WuZ.ShenJ. (2006). School choice and education equity—Change in school choice policies and new direction in public school reform in China. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 6, 111-118.
32.
YanG.ChangY. (2009). The circumstances and the possibilities of critical educational studies in China. In AppleM. W.AuW.GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 368-386). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
YuanZ. G. (1999). On changes of Chinese educational policy: A case study on the relationship between equality and benefit in key middle schools [in Chinese]. Guangzhou, China: Guangdong Education Publisher.
