Drawing on a 5-year qualitative study, this article explores opportunities for and barriers to parental engagement in a small, urban school district. Two competing narratives of parental involvement emerge. In one, parents describe their reluctance to engage formally in a district that continually fails their children. In the other, stakeholders argue that schools will not improve until parents become involved. Data demonstrate that many parents actively support their children’s education, exhibiting various forms of what Yosso terms “community cultural wealth.” This article concludes by questioning the claim that parents are not involved, utilizing Bourdieu’s theories of symbolic capital and symbolic violence to explain the prevalence of this discourse of disengagement.
Baquedano-LópezP.AlexanderR. A.HernandezS. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37, 149-182. doi:10.3102/0091732X12459718
2.
BourdieuP. (1979). Outline of a theory of practice (NiceR., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
6.
DePlantyJ.Coulter-KernR.DuchaneK. M. (2007). Perceptions of parent involvement in academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 361-368. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.6.361-368
7.
EpsteinJ. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 701-712. Available from http://www.kappanmagazine.org/
FineM. (1993). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94, 682-710. Available from http://www.tcrecord.org/
10.
FriedelT. L. (1999). The role of Aboriginal parents in public education: Barriers to change in an urban setting. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 23(2), 139-158. Retrieved from http://www.lights.ca/sifc/cjne.htm
11.
GarcíaS. B.GuerraP. L. (2004). Deconstructing deficit thinking: Working with educators to create more equitable learning environments. Education and Urban Society, 36, 150-168. doi:10.1177/0013124503261322
12.
GonzálezN. (2005). Beyond culture: The hybridity of funds of knowledge. In GonzálezN.MollL. C.AmantiC. (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 29-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
GutmanL. M.McLoydV. C. (2000). Parents’ management of their children’s education within the home, at school, and in the community: An examination of African-American families living in poverty. The Urban Review, 32, 1-24. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/journal/11256
14.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
HarrisA.GoodallJ. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50, 277-289. doi:10.1080/00131880802309424
16.
IshimaruA. M. (2014). Rewriting the rules of engagement: Elaborating a model of district-community collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 84(2), 188-216.
17.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
LareauA.HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 37-53. doi:10.2307/2673185
19.
LightfootD. (2004). “Some parents just don’t care”: Decoding the meanings of parental involvement in urban schools. Urban Education, 39, 91-107. doi:10.1177/0042085903259290
20.
MacfarlaneK. (2009). Navigating a treacherous game: Conceptualising parental engagement in contemporary Queensland schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30, 563-576. doi:10.1080/01425690903101056
21.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
22.
MiedelW. T.ReynoldsA. J. (1999). Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantaged children: Does it matter?Journal of School Psychology, 37, 379-402. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00023-0
23.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
24.
MunozM. A. (2000). Parental volunteerism in kindergarten: Assessing its impact in reading and mathematics tests. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED464745)
25.
NakagawaK. (2000). Unthreading the ties that bind: Questioning the discourse of parent involvement. Educational Policy, 14, 443-472. doi:10.1177/0895904800144001
26.
Pérez CarreónG.DrakeC.Calabrese BartonA. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 465-498. doi:10.3102/00028312042003465
27.
RamaekersS.SuissaJ. (2011). Parents as “educators”: Languages of education, pedagogy and “parenting.”Ethics and Education, 6, 197-212. doi:10.1080/17449642. 2011.623002
28.
ReamR. K.PalardyG. L. (2008). Reexamining social class differences in the availability and the educational utility of parental social capital. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 238-273. doi:10.3102/0002831207308643
29.
ReayD. (1998). Cultural reproduction: Mothers’ involvement in their children’s primary school. In GrenfellM.JamesD. (Eds.), Bourdieu and education: Acts of practical theory (pp. 55-71). London, England: Falmer Press.
30.
ReedW. A. (2007). Inside connections: Local teachers’ perspectives on parental engagement in an urban elementary school. Teacher Education & Practice, 20, 297-309. Retrieved from https://rowman.com/page/TEP
31.
Rios-AguilarC.KiyamaJ. M.GravittM.MollL. C. (2011). Funds of knowledge for the poor and forms of capital for the rich? A capital approach to examining funds of knowledge. Theory and Research in Education, 9, 163-184. doi:10.1177/1477878511409776
32.
SandersM. G.EpsteinJ. L. (1998). School-family-community partnerships in middle and high schools: From theory to practice (Report No. 22). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423330)
33.
SheldonS. B.EpsteinJ. L. (2005). Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 196-206. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.4.196-207
34.
SwartzD. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Van VoorhisF. L. (2003). Interactive homework in middle school: Effects on family involvement and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 323-338. doi:10.1080/00220670309596616
37.
WarrenM. R.HongS.RubinC. L.UyP. S. (2009). Beyond the bake sale: A community-based relational approach to parent engagement in schools. Teachers College Record, 111, 2209-2254.
38.
WeissR. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press.
39.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69-91. doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006
