Multiple studies have shown the potential for school choice policies to benefit middle-class families, often to the detriment of lower income students in the same district. Yet, there is limited research examining the role of policies in promoting inequality by encouraging exclusionary behaviors. In this article, we utilize the concept of opportunity hoarding to analyze the specific policy provisions built into New York City’s elementary and high school choice plans that prompt middle-class parents to act in ways that secure advantages for their children. We find that parents’ anxiety about scarcity of high-quality educational options combined with the design of the choice policies facilitated pervasive opportunity hoarding that functioned as a collective strategy of class preservation.
AbdulkadirogluA.PathakP. A.RothA. E. (2005). The New York City high school match. The American Economic Review, 95, 364-367.
2.
AbdulkadirogluA.PathakP. A.SchellenbergJ.WaltersC. W. (2017, October). Do parents value school effectiveness? Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w23912 (NBER Working Paper No. 23912).
3.
AltenhofenS.BerendsM.WhiteT. G. (2016). School Choice Decision Making Among Suburban, High-Income Parents. AERA Open, 2(1), 1-14.
4.
AndersonE. (2010). The imperative of integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
AppleM. (2006). Educating the Right Way: Markets, Standards, God, and Inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BackA. (2003). Exposing the “whole segregation myth”: The Harlem nine and New York City’s school desegregation battles. In WoodardK. (Ed.), Freedom north: Black freedom struggles outside the south 1940-1980 (pp. 65-91). Gordonsville, VA: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BallS. J. (1993). Education markets, choice, and social class: The market as a class strategy in the U.K. and the U.S. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14, 3-19.
8.
BallS. J.BoweR.GerwitzS. (1995). Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. The Sociological Review, 43, 52-78.
9.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F.RossS. (2009). Public school choice and integration: Evidence from Durham, North Carolina. Social Science Research: A Quarterly Journal of Social Science Methodology and Quantitative Research, 38, 71-85.
10.
BillinghamC. M.HuntM. O. (2016). School racial composition and parental choice: New evidence on the preferences of White parents in the United States. Sociology of Education, 89, 99-117.
11.
BloomH. S.UntermanR. (2014). Can small high schools of choice improve educational prospects for disadvantaged students?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 290-319.
12.
BorlandJ. (2004). Issues and practices in the identification and education of gifted students from underrepresented groups. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
13.
BourdieuP. (1986) The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (New York, Greenwood), 241-258.
14.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. P. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London, England: Sage.
15.
CalarcoJ. M. (2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
CarterP. L.WelnerK. (2011). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
ChubbJ.MoeT. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
18.
CorcoranS. P. (March, 2016). Challenges and opportunities of the New York City high school application process. Presentation for the Center on Race, Law, and Justice, Fordham University, New York, NY.
19.
CorcoranS. P.LevinH. M. (2011). School choice and competition in New York City schools. In O’DayJ. A.BitterC. S.GomezL. M. (Eds.), Education reform in New York City: Ambitious change in the nation’s most complex school system (pp. 199-224). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20.
CorcoranS. P.JenningsJ. L.CohodesS. R.Sattin-BajajC. (2017). Administrative complexity as a barrier to school choice: Evidence from New York City. Unpublished working paper, New York University.
21.
CucchiaraM. (2013a). Marketing schools, marketing cities: Who wins and who loses when schools become urban amenities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
CucchiaraM. (2013b). “Are we doing damage?” Choosing an urban public school in an era of parental anxiety. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 44, 75-93.
23.
CucchiaraM. B.HorvatE. M. (2009). Perils and promises: Middle-class parental involvement in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 974-1004.
24.
CullenJ. B.JacobB. A.LevittS. D. (2000). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago Public Schools (NBER Working Paper No. 7888). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7888
EdelbergJ.KurlandS. (2011). How to walk to school: Blueprint for a neighborhood school renaissance. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
EhrenhaltA. (2013). The great inversion and the future of the American city. New York, NY: Vintage.
28.
EnglandP. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24, 149-166.
29.
FriedmanMilton1955. “The Role of Government in Education.” In SoloRobert A. (ed.), Economics and the Public Interest, pp. 123-144. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
30.
FructerN. M.HesterM.MokhtarC.ShahnZ. (2012). Is demography still destiny? Neighborhood demographics and public high school students’ readiness for college in New York City. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Brown University.
31.
Giroux. (2015). Education and the crisis of public values: Challenging the assault on teachers, students, and public education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
32.
GlazermanS.DotterD. (2017). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 593-619.
33.
GottfriedM. A.ConchasG. Q. (Eds.). (2016). When school policies backfire: How well-intentioned measures can harm our most vulnerable students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
34.
HamiltonL.RoksaJ.NielsenK. (2018). Providing a “leg up”: Parental involvement and opportunity hoarding in college. Sociology of Education, 91, 111-131.
35.
HankinsK. B. (2007). The final frontier: Charter schools as new community institutions of Gentrification. Urban Geography, 28, 113-128.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
HenigJ. R. (1995). Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
39.
HochschildA. R. (1989). The second shift. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
40.
HochschildJ.ScovronickN. (2003). The American dream and the public schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
HolmeJ. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 177-205.
42.
HolmeJ. J.RichardsM. P. (2009). School choice and stratification in a regional context: Examining the role of inter-district choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 150-171.
43.
HurshD. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493-518.
44.
JohnsonH. B.ShapiroT. M. (2003). Good neighborhoods, good schools: Race and the “good choices” of White families. In DoaneA.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.), White out: The continuing significance of racism (pp. 173-188). New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
KimelbergS. M. (2014). Middle-class parents, risk, and urban public schools. In LareauA.GoyetteK. (Eds.), Choosing homes, choosing schools (pp. 207-236). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
KimelbergS. M.BillinghamC. M. (2013). Attitudes toward diversity and the school choice process: Middle-class parents in a segregated urban public school district. Urban Education, 48, 198-231.
47.
KoedelC.BettsJ.RiceL.ZauA. (2009). The integrating and segregating effects of school choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 110-129.
48.
KotokS.FrankenbergE.SchafftK. A.MannB. A.FullerE. J. (2017). School choice, racial segregation and poverty concentration: Evidence from Pennsylvania charter school transfers. Educational Policy, 31, 415-447.
LareauA. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 273-285.
51.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
LareauA.GoyetteK. (Eds.). (2014). Choosing homes, choosing schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
53.
LeeE.MacvarishJ.BristowJ. (2010). Risk, health and parenting culture. Health, Risk and Society, 12, 293-300.
54.
LeesL.SlatterT.WylyE. (2008). Gentrification. New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
LewisV. A.EmersonM. O.KlinebergS. L. (2011). Who we’ll live with: Neighborhood racial composition preferences of Whites, Blacks and Latinos. Social Forces, 89, 1385-1407.
57.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1979). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
58.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
59.
MaderN.HemphillC.AbbasQ. (2018). The paradox of choice: How school choice divides New York City elementary schools. New York: Center for New York City Affairs.
60.
MakrisM. V. (2015). Public housing and school choice in a gentrified city: Youth experiences of uneven opportunity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
MeadeB. (2009). Making the grade in New York City schools: Progress report grades and Black and Latino Students. New York: The Metropolitan Center for Urban Education, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, New York University.
62.
MickelsonR. A.BottiaM.SouthworthS. (2008). School choice and segregation by race, class, and achievement. Charlotte: Education Policy Research Unit, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
NathansonL.CorcoranS.Baker-SmithC. (2013). High school choice in NYC: A report on the school choices and placements of low-achieving students. New York: The Research Alliance for New York City Schools and the Institute for Education and Social Policy, New York University.
NYCIBO (New York City Independent Budget Office). (2015). Do a larger share of students attending the city’s specialized high schools live in neighborhoods with higher median incomes than those attending the city’s other high schools? Retrieved from http://ibo.nyc.ny.us/cgi-park2/?p=1016
74.
OfferS.SchneiderB. (2011). Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review, 11, 809-833.
75.
OwensA. (2017). Racial residential segregation of school-age children and adults and the role of schooling as a segregating force. Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(2), 63-80.
76.
PattilloM. (2015). Everyday politics of school choice in the Black community. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 12, 41-71.
77.
Pattillo-McCoyM. (1999). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril Among the Black middle class. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
78.
PearmanF. A.SwainW. A. (2017). School choice, gentrification and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 90, 213-235.
79.
PicowerB.MayorgaE. (Eds.). (2015). What’s race got to do with it? How current school reform policy maintains racial and economic inequality. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
80.
Posey-MaddoxL. (2014). When middle-class parents choose urban schools: Class, race & the challenge of equity in public education. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
81.
Posey-MaddoxL. (2015). Beyond the consumer: Parents, privatization, and fundraising in U.S. urban public schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 31, 178-197.
82.
Posey-MaddoxL.KimelbergS. M.CucchiaraM. (2014). Middle class parents and urban public schools: Current research and future directions. Sociology Compass, 8, 446-456.
QuintJ.SmithJ.UntermanR.MoedanoA. (2010). New York City’s changing high school landscape: High schools and their characteristics, 2002-2008. New York, NY: MDRC.
85.
RavitchD. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
86.
ReayD. (1996). Contextualising choice: Social power and parental involvement. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 581-598.
87.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
88.
RodaA. (2015). Inequality in gifted and talented programs: Parental choices about status, school opportunity, and second-generation segregation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
89.
RodaA. (2017). Parenting in the age of high-stakes testing: Gifted and talented admissions and the meaning of parenthood. Teachers College Record, 119(8), 1-53.
90.
RodaA.WellsA. S. (2013). School choice policies and racial segregation: Where White parents’ good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 261-293.
91.
RothsteinJ. M. (2006). Good principals or good peers? Parental valuation of school characteristics, Tiebout equilibrium, and the incentive effects of competition among jurisdictions. American Economic Review, 96, 1333-1350.
92.
SaporitoS. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50, 181-203.
93.
Sattin-BajajC. (2014).Unaccompanied minors: Immigrant youth, school choice, and the pursuit of equity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
94.
Sattin-BajajC. (2016). Elusive equity: The limits of high school choice in New York City. In GottfriedM. A.ConchasG.Q. (Eds.), When school policies backfire, pp. 109-132. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
95.
Sattin-BajajC.JenningsJ.CorcoranS. P.Baker-SmithC.HaileyC. (2018) Surviving at the street-level: How counselors’ implementation of school choice policy shapes students’ high school destinations. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 46-71.
96.
SaporitoS.LareauA. (1999). School selection as a process: The multiple dimensions of race in framing educational choice. Social Problems, 46, 418-429.
97.
SchneiderM.BuckleyJ. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 133-144.
98.
SchneiderM.TeskeP.MarschallM. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
SmrekarC.GoldringE. (1999). School choice in urban America: Magnet schools and the pursuit of equity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
101.
StillmanJ. B. (2012). Gentrification and schools: The process of integration when Whites reverse flight. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
102.
TeskeP.FitzpatrickJ.KaplanG. (2007). Opening doors: How low-income parents search for the right school. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.
103.
TillyC. (1999). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WaltersP. B. (2007). Explaining the durable racial divide in American education: Policy development and opportunity hoarding from Brown to vouchers. In Paper Presented at Conference on the Social Dimensions of Inequality sponsored by the Russell Sage Foundation and Carnegie Corporation, UCLA.
108.
WellsA. S.SernaI. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 93-118.
