Although affirmative action in college admissions has not been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, the consideration of race in admissions has been banned in nine states—in six of them by public vote. This article analyzes the campaigns to ban affirmative action in California and Michigan as a battle between interest groups. The course of events in these states demonstrates that public opinion is a threat to the legality of affirmative action, should interest groups continue to take advantage of it by pursuing bans by state initiative.
AbramowitzA.TeixeiraR. (2008). The decline of the white working class and the rise of a mass upper-middle class. In TeixeiraR. (Ed.), Red, blue, & purple America: The future of election demographics (pp. 109-143). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
California Attorney General. (n.d.). Prohibition against discrimination or preferential treatment by state and other public entities. Initiative constitutional amendment (Official title and summary prepared by the attorney general). Retrieved from http://vote96.sos.ca.gov/bp/209.htm
ChavezL. (1998). The color bind: California’s battle to end affirmative action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241 (1964).
7.
CohenD. K.MoffittS. L. (2011). The influence of practice on policy. In MitchellD. E.CrowsonR. L.ShippsD. (Eds.), Shaping education policy: Power and process (pp. 63-80). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
ConnerlyW. (2000). Creating equal: My fight against race preferences. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.
DahlR. A. (2005). Who governs? In ShafritzJ. M.LayneK. S.BorickC. P. (Eds.), Classics of public policy (pp. 100-106). New York, NY: Pearson Education. (Reprinted from Who governs? by DahlR. A.1961, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press)
11.
EdsallT. B.EdsallM. D. (1991). Chain reaction: The impact of race, rights, and taxes on American politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
12.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. No. 11–345, slip op. (U.S. June24, 2013).
13.
FobanjongJ. (2001). Understanding the backlash against affirmative action. Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
14.
FrankT. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
15.
FreyW. H. (2008). Race, immigration, and America’s changing electorate. In TeixeiraR. (Ed.), Red, blue, & purple America: The future of election demographics (pp. 79-108). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16.
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003).
17.
GrodskyE.KalogridesD. (2008). The declining significance of race in college admissions decisions. American Journal of Education, 115, 1-33.
18.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
19.
GurinP.DeyE. L.HurtadoS.GurinG. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330-366.
20.
HinrichsP. (2011). The effects of attending a diverse college. Economics of Education Review, 30, 332-341.
21.
HuckfeldtR. R.KohfeldC. W. (1989). Race and the decline of class in American politics. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
22.
JencksC.PhillipsM. (1998). The black-white test score gap: An introduction. In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 1-54). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
LairdB. (2005). The case for affirmative action in university admissions. Berkeley, CA: Bay Tree.
28.
LemannN. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy (1st ed.). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
29.
LewisE. (2004). Why history remains a factor in the search for racial equality. In GurinP.LehmanJ. S.LewisE. (Eds.), Defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 17-59). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
LossC. P. (2012). Between citizens and the state: The politics of American higher education in the 20th century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (Producer). (2006). Yes on proposal 2. Retrieved from http://youtu.be/AmK2SWWGkBY
MosesM. S. (2006). Why the affirmative action debate persists: The role of moral disagreement. Educational Policy, 20, 567-586.
38.
MosesM. S.SaenzL. P. (2008). Hijacking education policy decisions: Ballot initiatives and the case of affirmative action. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 289-310.
39.
MosesM. S.YunJ. T.MarinP. (2009). Affirmative action’s fate: Are 20 more years enough?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(17), 1-35.
OngP. M. (1999). Proposition 209 and its implications. In OngP. M. (Ed.), Impacts of affirmative action: Policies and consequences in California (pp. 197-209). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
45.
OpferV. D.YoungT.FusarelliL. (2008). Politics of interest: Interest groups and advocacy coalitions in American education. In CooperB.FusarelliL.CibulkaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 195-216). New York, NY: Routledge.
PusserB. (2004). Burning down the house: Politics, governance, and affirmative action at the University of California. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
RazaM. A.AndersonA. J.CustredH. G. (1999). The ups and downs of affirmative action preferences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
49.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
50.
RhoadsR. A.SaenzV.CarducciR. (2005). Higher education reform as a social movement: The case of affirmative action. Review of Higher Education, 28(2), 191-220.
RubioP. F. (2001). A history of affirmative action, 1619-2000. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
53.
RyanJ. E. (2010). Five miles away, a world apart: One city, two schools, and the story of educational opportunity in modern America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
SchmidtP. (2007). Color and money: How rich white kids are winning the war over college affirmative action (1st ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schuette, Attorney General of Michigan v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigration Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN). No. 12–682, slip op. (U.S. April22, 2014).
57.
SkocpolT. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
58.
SkrentnyJ. D. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action: Politics, culture, and justice in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
SkrentnyJ. D. (2002). The minority rights revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
60.
TrumanD. (2005). The governmental process. In ShafritzJ. M.LayneK. S.BorickC. P. (Eds.), Classics of public policy (pp. 83-87). New York, NY: Pearson Education. (Reprinted from The governmental process, by TrumanD. B.1951, New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf)
Zamani-GallaherE. M.GreenD. O.BrownM. C.IIStovallD. O. (2009). The case for affirmative action on campus: Concepts of equity, considerations for practice (1st ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
