We argue the emergence of a shift in U.S. language education policy discourses from an equity/heritage (EH) framework focused on equity for English learners and non-English heritage languages, toward a global human capital (GHC) framework linked to neoliberal considerations of the language skills of individuals and nations. This discursive shift represents a change in the audience to which language education programs are primarily marketed. Drawing on a critical approach to content analysis to test for evidence of this discursive shift in Utah, we analyzed 164 articles from 5 Utah newspapers from 2005 to 2011 that assigned value statements to dual language and bilingual education. EH values declined or changed little over time whereas GHC values increased. Policy implications are discussed.
AtasayE.DelavanG. (2012). Monumentalizing disaster and wreak-construction: A case study of Haiti to rethink the privatization of public education. Journal of Education Policy, 27(4), 259-553. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2012.662284
2.
AustinW. (2009, August11). Opinion. [Archived article from The Spectrum newspaper in St. George, Utah. Archive identifier: public174563790.sgml]. Copy in possession of first author.
3.
BakerC. (2011). Types of bilingual education. In BakerC. (Ed.), Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (pp. 206-220). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
4.
BallS. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BudachG.RoyS.HellerM. (2003). Community and commodity in French Ontario. Language in Society, 32, 603-627. doi:10.1017/S0047404503325011
CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.). (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
ChangM. (2013). The ABCs of Hmong: A Sacramento school learns the value of Hmong language immersion. Hypen, 27. Available from http://www.hyphenmagazine.com
10.
CohenA. D. (1974). The Culver City Spanish immersion program: The first two years. Modern Language Journal, 58, 95-103. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1974.tb05082.x
11.
ConleyM. (2009, December17). Utah is dedicated to creating a global workforce: An interview with Gregg Roberts, World Languages Specialist Utah State Office of Education [Web log post]. Available from http://www.mandarininstitute.org/
12.
CorsonD. J. (1992). Social justice and minority language policy. Educational Theory, 42, 181-200.
da SilvaE.HellerM. (2009). From protector to producer: The role of the State in the discursive shift from minority rights to economic development. Language Policy, 8, 95-116. doi:10.1007/s10993-009-9127-x
15.
da SilvaE.McLaughlinM.RichardsM. (2007). Bilingualism and the globalized new economy: The commodification of language and identity. In HellerM. (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 183-206). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
DelavanG.ValdezV. E.FreireJ. (2014). Language as whose resource?: How official state promotional materials portray the Utah dual language immersion model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17.
DeMilleD. (2007, December15). Bilingual effort earns props. The Spectrum, p. 1.
18.
DeMilleD. (2011, September14). School board discusses dual immersion. The Spectrum. Available from https://www.thespectrum.com/
19.
Deseret News. (2005, October4). Association of bilingual education plans conference Oct. 15 on tapping into a child’s first language. p. C02.
DornerL. M. (2011). Contested communities in a debate over dual-language education: The import of “public” values on public policies. Educational Policy, 25, 577-613. doi:10.1177/0895904810368275
22.
Editorial: Require all students to learn English [Editorial]. (2005, April29). The Spectrum, p. 7.
23.
FaircloughN. (2006). Language and globalization. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
FaircloughN. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
25.
FalkI. (1994). The making of policy: Media discourse conversations. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 15(2), 1-12. doi:10.1080/ 0159630940150201
26.
FidelS. (2011, March25). University of Utah deepening relationship with NSA’s Utah spy center. Deseret News, p. B1.
27.
FissP. C.HirschP. M. (2005). The discourse of globalization: Framing and sense making of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review, 70, 29-52. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4145349
28.
GalindoR. (1997). Language wars: The ideological dimensions of the debates on bilingual education. Bilingual Research Journal, 21, 163-201.
29.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education: Frameworks and types. In GarcíaO. (Ed.), Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective (pp. 111-136). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
30.
GeneseeF. (1998). French immersion in Canada. In EdwardsJ. (Ed.), Language in Canada (pp. 305-326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HamayanE.GeneseeF.CloudN. (2013). Dual language instruction from A to Z: Practical guidance for teachers and administrators. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32.
HealyJ. (2013, April19). A state seeks to be heard in a new world economy. New York Times [Reprinted as: Healy, J., Utah building on LDS missionary language tradition, Salt Lake Tribune, 2013, April20; available from http://www.sltrib.com/]
33.
HechingerJ. (2011, December23). Some charter schools evoke separate but equal era. Daily Herald. Available from http://www.heraldextra.com
34.
HellerM. (2002). Globalization and the commodification of bilingualism in Canada. In BlockD.CameronD. (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 47-63). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
HellerM. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, 473-492. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x
36.
HellerM. (2008). Language and the nation-state: Challenges to sociolinguistic theory and practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 504-524.
37.
HellerM. (2010). The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 101-114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00373.x
38.
HellerM. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
HellerM.DuchêneA. (2012). Pride and profit: Changing discourses of language, capital and nation-state. In DuchêneA.HellerM. (Eds.), Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (pp. 1-21). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
HodgettsD.MastersB.RobertsonN. (2004). Media coverage of “decades of disparity” in ethnic mortality in Aotearoa. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 455-472. doi:10.1002/casp.792
41.
HornbergerN. H. (2005). Nichols to NCLB: Local and global perspectives on US language education policy. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 20(2), 1-17.
42.
HossainT.PrattC. B. (2008). Language rights: A framework for ensuring social equity in planning and implementing national-education policies. New Horizons in Education, 56(3), 63-74.
43.
HowardE. R.SugarmanJ.ChristianD.Lindholm-LearyK. J.RogersD. (2007). Guiding principles for dual language education (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
44.
KontraM.PhillipsonR.Skutnabb-KangasT.VáradyT. (1999). Conceptualising and implementing linguistic human rights. In KontraM.PhillipsonR.Skutnabb-KangasT.VáradyT. (Eds.), Language, a right and a resource: Approaching linguistic human rights (pp. 1-21). New York, NY: Central European University Press.
45.
KrippendorffK. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
LeaV. (2011). Concocting crises to create consent: The importance of “The Shock Doctrine” to understanding current educational policy. In CarrP. R.PorfilioB. J. (Eds.), The phenomenon of Obama and the agenda for education: Can hope audaciously trump neoliberalism (pp. 23-47). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
47.
Lindholm-LearyK. J.BorsatoG. (2006). Academic achievement. In GeneseeF.Lindholm-LearyK.SaundersW.ChristianD. (Eds.), Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence (pp. 176-222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MacavintaA. (2011, September5). Brigham City school to offer Spanish immersion. Standard Examiner. Available from http://www.standard.net/
49.
MatthewsK. (2011, October22). New NYC private school aims for global reach. Deseret News. Available from http://www.deseretnews.com
50.
MayH. (2006, August29). Chamber’s SLC vision: Trails, rails and culture. The Salt Lake Tribune. Available from http://www.sltrib.com/
51.
McCartyT. L. (2002). Between possibilities and constraint: Indigenous language education, planning, and policy in the United States. In TollefsonJ. W. (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 285-307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
McQuillanJ.TseL. (1996). Does research matter? An analysis of media opinion on bilingual education, 1984-1994. Bilingual Research Journal, 20, 1-27.
53.
MenkenK. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
OpferV. D. (2007). Developing a research agenda on the media and education. Peabody Journal of Education, 82, 166-177. doi:10.1080/01619560709336541
60.
OvandoC. J. (2003). Bilingual education in the United States: Historical development and current issues. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 1-24. doi:10.1080/15235882.2003.10162589
61.
PerkinsN. (2006, January15). School board opts for immersion. Deseret News, p. B03.
62.
PetersM. (2001). National education policy constructions of the “knowledge economy”: Towards a critique. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1), 1-22. Retrieved from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/EDEQ
63.
PetrovicJ. E. (2005). The conservative restoration and neoliberal defenses of bilingual education. Language Policy, 4, 395-416. doi:10.1007/s10993-00502880y
64.
RicentoT. (2005). Problems with the “language-as-resource” discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, 348-368. doi:10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00296.x
65.
RodríguezR. (2013). Bilingual education. In JasinskiL. E.Handbook of Texas online. Denton, TX: Texas State Historical Association. Available from http://www.tshaonline.org/
66.
RolstadK.MahoneyK. S.GlassG. V. (2005). Weighing the evidence: A meta-analysis of bilingual education in Arizona. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 43-67. doi:10.1080/15235882.2005.10162823
67.
RossellC. (2009). Does bilingual education work? The case of Texas. Texas Public Policy Foundation. Available from http://www.texaspolicy.com/
68.
SaltmanK. J. (2005). The Edison schools: Corporate schooling and the assault on public education. New York, NY: Routledge.
69.
San MiguelG. (2004). Contested policy: The rise and fall of federal bilingual education in the United States 1960-2001. Denton: University of North Texas Press.
70.
SchmidtR.Sr. (2002). Racialization and the language policy: The case of the U.S.A. Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 21(2-3), 141-161. doi: 10.1515/mult.2002.007
71.
ShohamyE. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York, NY: Routledge.
SleeterC. (2007). Facing accountability in education: Democracy and equity at risk. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
74.
SleeterC. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1947-1957. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.003
75.
The Spectrum. (2011, May11). Editorial: Dual immersion [Editorial]. p. A6.
76.
TaylorS. (2011, March22). Mormon church operates 14 missionary training centers around the world. Deseret News. Available from http://www.deseretnews.com/
77.
ThomasS. (2006). Education policy in the media: Public discourses on education. Brisbane, Australia: Post Pressed.
78.
ThomasW. P.CollierV. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence, University of California-Santa Cruz. Retrieved from http://repositories.cdlib.org/crede/finalrpts/1_1_final
TollefsonJ. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In RicentoT. (Ed.), Introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42-59). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
81.
TollefsonJ. W.TsuiA. B. M. (2014). Language diversity and language policy in educational access and equity. Review of Research in Education, 38, 189-214. doi:10.3102/0091732X13506846
82.
Utah Senate Bill 41, Chapter 235, Laws of Utah (2008) (enacted).
83.
ValdezV. E.FreireJ. A.DelavanG. (2014). The gentrification of dual language education. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
84.
VargheseM. M.ParkC. (2010). Going global: Can dual-language programs save bilingual education?Journal of Latinos and Education, 9, 72-80. doi:10.1080/15348430903253092
85.
WallaceM. (1993). Discourse of derision: The role of the mass media within the education policy process. Journal of Education Policy, 8, 321-337. doi:10.1080/0268093930080402
86.
WeinerL. (2007). NCLB, U.S. education, and the world bank: Neoliberalism comes home. In SleeterC. (Ed.), Facing accountability in education: Democracy and equity at risk (pp. 159-171). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
87.
WileyT. G. (2014). Diversity, super-diversity, and monolingual language ideology in the United States: Tolerance or intolerance?Review of Research in Education, 38, 1-32.
88.
WileyT. G.WrightW. E. (2004). Against the undertow: The politics of language instruction in the United States. Educational Policy, 18, 142-168. doi:10.1177/0895904803260030
89.
WrightW. E. (2005). The political spectacle of Arizona’s Proposition 203. Educational Policy, 19, 662-700.
