This study examined state efforts to control tuition increases over the past 10 years. Using data from 50 states and 540 public 4-year universities and colleges, we examined average tuition increases in dollar amount and percentage of change by the type of state tuition control policy and by the authority for tuition-setting power. The state policy efforts considered for this study include setting tuition caps, providing incentives, and linking tuition policy to financial aid policy. Findings revealed that two state policies (i.e., linking tuition to financial aid and providing incentives to limit the tuition increase) are effective in controlling tuition. Tuition was more likely to increase when individual institutions have tuition-setting authority. This study also reveals that a state’s tuition cap policy can adversely affect tuition control.
BellA. C.CarnahanJ.L’OrangeH. (2011). State tuition, fees, and financial assistance policies for public colleges and universities, 2010-11. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
2.
BoatmanA.L’OrangeH. (2006). State tuition, fees, and financial assistance policies for public colleges and universities, 2005-06. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
3.
BoehnerJ. A.McKeonH. P. (2003). The college cost crisis: A congressional analysis of college costs and implications for America’s higher education system. Retrieved from http://www2.bgsu.edu/downloads/finance/file17013.pdf
4.
BurgessB. (2011). Evaluating the policies that lead to substantial tuition variation at public land-grant universities. Planning for Higher Education, 39, 25-33.
5.
CalhounJ.KamerschenD. (2010). The impact of governing structure on the pricing behavior and market structure of public institutions of higher education in the U.S. International Review of Economics, 57, 317-333.
6.
CallanP. M.FinneyJ. E. (2002). State policies for affordable higher education. In Losing ground: A national status report on the affordability of American higher education (pp. 10-11). San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and HigherEducation. Retrieved from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/losing_ground/affordability_report_final.pdf
7.
CheslockJ. J.HughesR. P. (2011). Differences across states in higher education finance policy. Journal of Education Finance, 36, 369-393.
EhrenbergR. G. (2000). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
12.
HauptmanA. M. (1990). The college tuition spiral. Washington, DC: American Council on Education and The College Board.
13.
HearnJ. C.GriswoldC.MarineG. (1996). Region, resources, reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37, 241-278.
14.
HellerD. E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update to Leslie and Brinkman. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, 624-659.
15.
HellerD. E. (2001). The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Higher Education Opportunity Act, Pub. Law 110–315 (2008).
17.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). The tuition puzzle: Putting the pieces together. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
JohnstonD. B. (2006). Financing higher education: Cost-sharing in international perspective. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SensePublishers.
19.
KaneT. J. (1994). The causes and consequences of recent public tuition increases. Cambridge, MA: Monograph, Kennedy School of Government.
20.
KivistoJ. (2005). The government-higher education institution relationship: Theoretical considerations from the perspective of agency theory. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 1-17.
21.
KnottJ. H.PayneA. A. (July, 2001). The impact of state governance structures on higher education resources and research activity (Working paper). Urbana: University of Illinois.
22.
KoshalR. K.KoshalM. (2000). State appropriation and higher education tuition: What is the relationship?Education Economics, 8, 81-89.
23.
LeslieL. L.BrinkmanP. T. (1987). Student price response in higher education: The student demand studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 58, 181-201.
24.
LowryR. C. (2001). Governmental structure, trustee selection, and public university prices and spending: Multiple means to similar ends. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 845-861.
25.
MarcucciP.JohnstoneD. B. (2007). Tuition policies in a comparative perspective: Theoretical and political rationales. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 25-40.
26.
McLendonM. K. (2003). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17, 165-191.
27.
MortensonT. (2003, October). Economic segregation of higher education opportunity 1973 to 2001. Postsecondary Education Opportunity, 136, 1-16.
28.
MumperM. (2001a). The paradox of college prices. In HellerD. (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy (pp. 39-63). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
MumperM. (2001b). State efforts to keep public colleges affordability in the face of fiscal stress. In PaulsenM. B.SmartJ. C. (Ed.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy & practice (pp. 321-354). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
30.
MumperM. (2003). Does policy design matter? Comparing universal and targeted approaches to encouraging college participation. Educational Policy, 17, 38-59.
31.
MumperM.FreemanM. L. (2005). The causes and consequences of public college tuition inflation. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XX, pp. 307-361). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
32.
National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education. (1998). Straight talk about college costs and prices: A report of the National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
OkunadeA. A. (2004). What factors influence state appropriations for public higher education in the United States?Journal of Education Finance, 30, 123-138.
34.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2012). Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2012. Paris, France: Author.
35.
PaulsenM. B. (2001). Economic perspectives on rising college tuition: A theoretical and empirical exploration. In PaulsenM. B.SmartJ. C. (Ed.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy & practice (pp. 193-263). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
36.
PriestD.St. JohnE. P. (Eds.). (2006). Privatization and public universities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37.
RasmussenC. (2003). State tuition, fees, and financial assistance policies for public colleges and universities, 2002-03. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
38.
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia. (2003). Condition of higher education funding in Virginia. Richmond, VA: Author.
39.
St. JohnE. P. (1994). Assessing tuition and student aid strategies: Using price-response measures to simulate pricing alternatives. Research in Higher Education, 35, 301-334.
40.
St. JohnE. P.PaulsenM.CarterD. (2005). Diversity, college costs, and postsecondary opportunity: An examination of the financial nexus between college choice and persistence for African Americans and whites. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 545-569.
WallerC.CobleR.ScharerJ.GiamportoneS. (2000). Governance and coordination of public higher education in all 50 states. Raleigh, NC: Center for Public Policy Research.
