Historically, the government has sought to improve the quality of the teacher workforce by requiring certification. Teachers are among the most licensed public personnel employees in the United States. Traditionally, an education degree with a student teaching experience and passage of licensure exams were necessary for licensure. In the 1980s, alternative paths to certification developed. In this article, we evaluated the impact of licensure screens and licensure routes on student achievement. Our findings from an analysis of Arkansas data suggest that there is little difference in terms of quality between traditionally and alternatively certified teachers. However, licensure exams do have some predictive power.
BallouD.SandersW.WrightP. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 37-65.
2.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 176-216.
3.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RockoffJ.WyckoffJ. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 793-818.
4.
Clark TuttleC.AndersonT.GlazermanS. (2009, August). ABCTE teachers in Florida and their effect on student performance (Report No. 6215-400). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
5.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778-820.
6.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement? (Working Paper 2). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
7.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 665-681.
8.
ConstantineJ.PlayerD.SilvaT.HallgrenK.GriderM.DekeJ.WarnerE. (2009). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification (Final Report, NCEE 2009-4043). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
9.
CroningerR. G.RiceJ. K.RathbunA.NishioM. (2003). Teacher qualifications and first grade achievement: A multilevel analysis (Document OP-03-02). College Park, MD: Center for Education Policy and Leadership.
10.
FergusonR. F.LaddH. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In LaddH. F. (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265-298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
FriedmanM.KuznetsS. (1945). Income from independent professional practice. New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
GlazermanS.MayerD.DeckerP. (2006). Alternative routes to teaching: The impacts of Teach for America on student achievement and other outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 75-96.
13.
GoldhaberD. (2007). Everyone’s doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness?Journal of Human Resources, 42, 765-784.
14.
GoldhaberD.AnthonyE. (2007). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? National board certification as a signal of effective teaching. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 134-150.
15.
GoldhaberD.BrewerD. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129-145.
16.
HanushekE.KainJ. F.O’BrienD. M.RivkinS. G. (2005). The market for teacher quality (Working Paper 11154). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17.
JohnsonS. M.BirkelandS. E.PeskeH. G. (2005). Life in the fast track: How states seek to balance incentives and quality in alternative teacher certification programs. Educational Policy, 19, 63-89.
18.
KaneT.RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27, 615-631.
19.
KleinerM. M. (2000). Occupational licensing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 189-202.
20.
KleinerM. M.KruegerA. B. (2010). The prevalence and effects of occupational licensing. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48, 676-687.
21.
McGeeJ.CostrellR. (2010, January5). Who leaves and who stays: An analysis of teachers’ behavioral response to retirement incentives. Paper presented at the American Economic Association Conference, Atlanta, GA.
PodgurskyM. (2004). Teacher licensing in U.S. public schools: The case for simplicity and flexibility. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 15-43.
24.
RivkinS. G.HanushekE.KainJ. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 418-458.
25.
RockoffJ. E.JacobB. A.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2008). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? (Working Paper Series No. 14485). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
26.
RottenbergS. (1962). The economics of occupational licensing. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), Aspects of labor economics (pp. 3-20). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0601.pdf
XuZ.HannawayJ.TaylorC. (2011). Making a difference? The effects of Teach for America in high school. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 447-469.
