Abstract
We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to describe what is known about dual-certification, where teachers are certified in both special education and general education. From database, register, working paper, and citation searches, we identified 27 studies addressing four topics: (a) dual-certified teachers’ beliefs about instruction, preparedness, and students; (b) student sorting; (c) effectiveness; and (d) workforce decisions. The results of the studies provided limited evidence that dual-certified teachers were more effective than other teachers. However, studies rarely addressed the preparation and roles of dual-certified teachers, both variables related to effectiveness. Finally, growing evidence suggested that dual-certified teachers had higher attrition than other teachers. The meta-analyses were limited by the small number of comparable quantitative studies addressing dual-certification.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
