Is PAR a Good Investment? Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Teacher Peer Assistance and Review Programs

Abstract

Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) is a local labor–management initiative designed to improve teacher quality. In PAR, expert “consulting teachers” mentor, support, and evaluate novice and underperforming veteran teachers. Evaluations under PAR can lead to dismissals. The authors examine the costs and benefits of PAR, both financial and organizational. Although PAR is an expensive reform, costing US$3,000 to US$10,000 per teacher served, it affords the district a range of financial savings and organizational benefits that offset program costs. The authors argue that limiting the scope of an educational cost-benefit study to only quantifiable elements artificially constrains understanding what a reform actually requires and offers.

Keywords

evaluation teacher assessment teacher research educational reform

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnes

Crowe

Schaefer

(2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from http://www.nctaf.org/resources/demonstration_projects/turnover/documents/CTTFullReportfinal.pdf

Barnett

W. S.

(1996). Lives in the balance: Age-27 benefit-cost analysis of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, No. 11). Ypsilanti, MI: The High/Scope Press.

Belfield

Levin

H.M.

, eds. (2007). The price we pay: Economic and social consequences of inadequate education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Birkeland

S. E.

Curtis

(2006). Ensuring the support and development of new teachers in the Boston Public Schools: A proposal to improve teacher quality and retention. Boston, MA: Boston Public Schools.

Boardman

A. E.

Greenberg

D. H.

Vining

A. R.

Weimer

D. L.

(2006). Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Bridges

E. M.

(1992). The incompetent teacher: Managerial responses, a revised and extended edition. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778-820.

Dawson

T. C.

Billingsley

K. L.

(2000). Unsatisfactory performance: How California’s K-12 education system protects mediocrity and how teacher quality can be improved. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.

Deming

(forthcoming). Better schools, less crime? Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from http://sites.google.com/site/demingdavid/Deming_BetterSchoolsLessCrime.pdf?attredirects=0

10.

Dillon

(2008, November 18). Head of teachers’ union offers to talk on tenure and merit pay. New York Times. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/education/18teach.html

11.

Donaldson

(2009). So long Lake Wobegon? Using teacher evaluation to improve teacher quality. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/pdf/teacher_evaluation.pdf

12.

Duncan

(2009). Interview with Wolf Blitzer, Transcript. The Situation Room. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0903/10/sitroom.02.html.

13.

Goldin

Katz

L.F.

(2008). The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

14.

Goldstein

(2004). Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of Peer Assistance and Review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(2), 173-97.

15.

Goldstein

(2007). Easy to dance to: Solving the problems of teacher evaluation with peer assistance and review. American Journal of Education, 113, 479-508.

16.

Honawar

(2007). New York City taps lawyers to weed out bad teachers. Education Week, 27(14), 13.

17.

Hummel-Rossi

Ashdown

(2002). The state of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses in education. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 1-30.

18.

Jackson

C. K.

Bruegmann

(2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85-108.

19.

Johnson

S. M.

Birkeland

S. E.

(2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581-617.

20.

Johnson

S.M.

Fiarman

S.E.

Munger

M.S.

Papay

J.P.

Qazilbash

E.K.

(2009). A user’s guide to Peer Assistance and Review. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ngt/par.”

21.

Johnson

S.M.

Papay

J.P.

Fiarman

S.E.

Munger

M.S.

Qazilbash

E.K.

(2010). Teacher to teacher: Realizing the potential of Peer Assistance and Review. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

22.

Kemple

J. J.

(2008). Career academies: Long-term impacts on labor market outcomes, educational attainment, and transitions to adulthood. New York, NY: MDRC. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/482/full.pdf

23.

Koppich

(2004). Toward improving teacher quality: An evaluation of Peer Assistance and Review in Montgomery County Public Schools. Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from www.mcps.k12.md.us/departments/development/documents/pgs/PAR_report_final.doc

24.

Koppich

(2005). Addressing teacher quality through induction, professional compensation, and evaluation: The effects on labor-management relations. Educational Policy, 19(1), 90-111.

25.

Levin

H. M.

(1983). Cost-effectiveness: A primer. London: SAGE.

26.

Levin

H. M.

McEwan

P. J.

(2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

27.

Lieberman

(1998). Teachers evaluating teachers: Peer review and the new unionism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

28.

McEwan

P. J.

(2002). Are cost-effectiveness methods used correctly? In Levin

H. M.

McEwan

P. J.

(Eds.), Cost-effectiveness and educational policy: Yearbook of the American Education Finance Association (pp. 37-53). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

29.

Milanowski

A. T.

Odden

A. R.

(2007). A new approach to the cost of teacher turnover (Working Paper 13). Seattle, WA: School Finance Redesign Project, Center on Reinventing Public Education.

30.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

31.

Murnane

R. J.

Willett

J. B.

Levy

(1995). The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(2), 251-266.

32.

National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from http://nctaf.org/documents/WhatMattersMost.pdf

33.

Obama

(2009, March 26). White House “Open for Questions” Town Hall transcript. New York Times. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/us/politics/26text-obama.html?pagewanted=all

34.

Rice

J. K.

(1997). Cost analysis in education: Paradox and possibility. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 309-317.

35.

Rockoff

(2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement. Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252.

36.

Ross

J. A.

Barkaoui

Scott

(2007). Evaluations that consider the cost of educational programs: The contribution of high-quality studies. American Journal of Education, 28(4), 477-492.

37.

Texas Center for Educational Research. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from http://www.tcer.org/research/documents/teacher_turnover_full.doc

38.

Toch

Rothman

(2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Washington, DC: Education Sector.

39.

Tucker

(1997). Lake Wobegon: Where all teachers are competent (or have we come to terms with the problem of incompetent teachers?). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(2), 103-126.

40.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Current population survey, annual social and economic supplements. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/people/p14AR.xls

41.

van Lier

(2008). Learning from Ohio’s best teachers: A homegrown model to improve our schools. Cleveland, OH: Policy Matters Ohio. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from http://www.policymattersohio.org/LearningFromOhiosBest.htm

42.

Villar

Strong

(2007). Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five-year rate of return of a comprehensive mentoring program for beginning teachers. ERS Spectrum, 25(3), 1-17.

43.

Ward

M. E.

(1995). Teacher dismissal: The impact of tenure, administrator competence, and other factors. School Administrator, 52, 16-19.

44.

Weingarten

(2010). A new path forward: Four approaches to quality teaching and better schools. Speech at the National Press Club, January 12. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from http://www.aft.org/newspubs/news/2010/011210a.cfm

45.

Weisberg

Sexton

Mulhern

Keeling

(2009). The Widget Effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved June 27, 2009, from http://widgeteffect.org/