This study draws on data collected from case studies of four precollege outreach programs and a survey of program administrators to explore the ways that youth-oriented precollege outreach programs may promote the educational attainment of the parents of participating students. The results suggest that precollege outreach programs may expand the “worldview” of participating students’ parents to include enrollment in an educational program as a realistic option and provide parents with information required for this enrollment. The results also suggest that, despite the potential role of precollege outreach programs in promoting the educational attainment of participating students’ parents, low current educational attainment and insufficient financial resources are substantial deterrents to enrollment.
AuerbachS. (2004). Engaging Latino parents in supporting college pathways: Lessons from a college access program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3, 125-145.
2.
Author. (2002).
3.
Author. (2006).
4.
Author et al. (2008).
5.
BeckerG. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
College Board. (2001). 2001 Outreach Program Handbook. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
7.
Commission on Access, Admissions, and Success in Higher Education. (2008). Coming to our senses: Education and the American future. Washington, DC: College Board.
DesJardinsS. L.ToutkoushianR. K. (2005). Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 20, pp. 191-240). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
10.
ErismanW.Del RiosM. (2008). Creating change one step at a time: Efforts to improve college access and success in Indiana. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
11.
GillieS.IsenhourM.QuinbyR. (2007). College access in Indiana and the United States: Improving college access and success for Indiana adults 25 and over. Bloomington: Indiana Pathways to College Network.
12.
GoldE.HartmannT.LewisK. (2005). Children and families first: An evaluation of the Philadelphia say yes to education program. Philadelphia: Research for Action.
13.
Hoover-DempseyK.SandlerH. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education?Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3-42.
LapovskyL. (2008). Rethinking student aid: Nontraditional students. In BaumS.McPhersonM.SteeleP., The effectiveness of student aid policies: What the research tells us (pp. 141-157). Washington, DC: The College Board.
16.
Lumina Foundation for Education. (n.d.). Research—Increasing levels of higher education attainment among all groups. Retrieved February 25, 2009, from http://www.luminafoundation.org/research/
17.
Matus-GrossmanL.GoodenS. T. (2001). Opening doors to earning credentials: Impressions of community college access and retention from low-wage workers. New York: MDRC. Retrieved February 26, 2009, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/137/full.pdf
18.
MazzeoC.StrawnJ.RobertsB. (2009). The pathways to advancement project: How states can expand postsecondary educational opportunities for working adults. Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices.
19.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Recent participation in formal learning among working-age adults with different levels of education (NCES 2008-041). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved February 24, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008041.pdf
21.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Digest of education statistics (NCES 2010-013). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
OsborneM.MarksA.TurnerE. (2004). Becoming a mature student: How adult applicants weigh the advantages and disadvantages of higher education. Higher Education: International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 48, 291-315.
25.
PaulsenM. B. (2001). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In PaulsenM. B.SmartJ. C. (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 55-94). New York: Agathon Press.
26.
PernaL. W. (2002). Pre-college outreach programs: Characteristics of programs serving historically underrepresented groups of students. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 64-83.
27.
PernaL. W. (2004). Impact of student aid program design, operations, and marketing on the formation of family college-going plans and resulting college-going behaviors of potential students. Boston, MA: The Education Resources Institute, Inc. (TERI).
28.
PernaL. W. (2006). Studying college choice: A proposed conceptual model. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. XXI (pp. 99-157). Springer.
29.
PernaL. W.Rowan-KenyonH.BellA.LiC.ThomasS. L. (2008). Typology of federal and state policies designed to promote college enrollment. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 243-267.
30.
PusserB.BrenemanD. W.GansnederB. M.KohlK. J.LevinJ. S.MilamJ. H.. (2007). Returning to learning: Adults’ success in college is key to America’s future. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education, New Agenda Series.
31.
SeftorN. S.TurnerS. E. (2002). Back to school: Federal student aid policy and adult college enrollment. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 336-352.
32.
SisselP.A. (1997). Participation and learning in Head Start: A sociopolitical analysis. Adult Education Quarterly, 47(3/4), 123-137.
33.
St. JohnE.TuttleT. (2004). Financial aid and postsecondary opportunity for nontraditional age, pre-college students: The roles of information and the education delivery system. Boston: The Education Resources Institute. Retrieved September 28, 2010, from http://www.teri.org/pdf/research-studies/ReseachReport_StJohn2.pdf
34.
St. PierreR. G.RicciutiA. E.RimdziusT. A. (2005). Effects of a family literacy program on low-literate children and their parents: Findings from an evaluation of the Even Start family literacy program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 953-970.
35.
SwailW. S.PernaL. W. (2001). A view of the landscape: Results of the national survey of outreach programs (College Board 2001Outreach Program Handbook). New York: Educational Policy Institute. Retrieved September 28, 2010, from http://www.educationalpolicy.org/pdf/OutreachHandbookEssays.pdf
36.
TierneyW. G. (2002). Parents and families in precollege preparation: The lack of connection between research and practice. Educational Policy, 16, 588-606.
37.
TierneyW. G.AuerbachS. (2005). Toward developing an untapped resource: The role of families in college preparation. In TierneyW. G.CorwinZ.ColyarJ. E. (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
ValentineT.DarkenwaldG. G. (1990). Deterrents to participation in adult education: Profiles of potential adult learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(1), 29-42.
40.
YinR. K. (2003a). Applications of case study research (Vol. 34, 2nd ed., Applied Social Research Methods Series). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
YinR. K. (2003b). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5, 3rd ed., Applied Social Research Methods Series). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
