The concept of responsibility is highly relevant to the organization of public schooling. Through public schools, adult citizens allow for the formal nurture and training of children to become full citizens, able to participate in our shared social, economic, and political life. With growing awareness of the importance of effective schooling to individual and collective well-being, wide-scale attempts have recently been made to reform school governance in the United States and internationally. The authors show how use of a responsibility framework can generate important insights into such reform efforts and their effects. Scholars and practitioners have done well incorporating accountability into the language of policy and practice. Little has been said about responsibility. The authors address this omission and apply their framework to interpret two distinctive reform strategies: (a) efforts to strengthen mayoral control over urban schools and (b) the creation of charter schools.
Abernathy, S.F. ( 2005). School choice and the future of American democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Allen, A., & Plank, D.N. ( 2005). School board election structure and democratic representation . Educational Policy, 19, 510-527.
3.
Berkman, M.B., & Plutzer, E. ( 2005). Ten thousand democracies: Politics and public opinion in America’s school districts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4.
Bovens, M. ( 1998). The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. ( 2007). Charter schools: Hope or hype. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Bulkley, K., & Fisler, J. ( 2003). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice . Educational Policy, 17, 317-342.
7.
Chambers, S. ( 2002). Urban education reform and minority political empowerment . Political Science Quarterly, 117(4), 643-665.
8.
Chambers, S. ( 2006). Mayors and schools: Minority voices and democratic tensions in urban education. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Clune, W. H., & Witte, J. F. (Eds.). (1990). Choice and control in American education (2 vols.). New York: Falmer.
11.
Conley, D.T. ( 2003). Who governs our schools? Changing roles and responsibilities . New York: Teachers College Press .
12.
Cooper, T.L. ( 1998). The responsible administrator (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
13.
Cross, C.T. ( 2004). Political education: National policy comes of age. New York, NY: Teachers College Record.
14.
Crowson, R.L. ( 1998). Community empowerment and the public schools: Can educational professionalism survive? Peabody Journal of Education, 73(1), 56-68.
15.
Dewey, J. ( 1916). Democracy and education. New York : Macmillan.
16.
Estes, M.B. ( 2004). Choice for all? Charter schools and students with special needs. Journal of Special Education, 37, 257-268.
17.
Etzioni, A. ( 1996). The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Favro, T. ( 2007). US mayors are divided about the merits of controlling schools. Retrieved June 13, 2008, from http://www.citymayors.com/education/usa_schoolboards.html
19.
Feuerstein, A. ( 2002). Elections, voting, and democracy in local school district governance. Educational Policy, 16, 15-36.
20.
Finn, C.E., Manno, B.V., & Vanourek, G. ( 2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Finnigan, K.S. ( 2007). Charter school autonomy: The mismatch between theory and practice. Educational Policy, 21, 503-526.
22.
Gutmann, A. ( 1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
23.
Hart, H.L.A. ( 1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
24.
Heifetz, R.A. ( 1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University .
25.
Held, D. ( 2006). Models of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
26.
Henig, J., & Rich, W. (Eds.). (2004). Mayors in the middle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Hirschman, A.O. ( 1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Kirst, M., & Bulkley, K. ( 2003). Mayoral takeover: The different directions taken in different cities. In J. Cibulka & W. H. Boyd (Eds.), A race against time: The crisis in urban schooling (pp. 63-81). Westport, CT: Praeger.
29.
Labaree, D.F. ( 1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39-81.
Land, D. ( 2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 229-278.
32.
Lange, C.M., & Lehr, C.A. ( 2000). Charter schools and students with disabilities: Parent perceptions of reasons for transfer and satisfaction with services. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 141-151.
33.
Leal, D.L., Martinez-Ebers, V., & Meier, K.J. ( 2004). The politics of Latino education: The biases of at-large elections. Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1224-1244.
34.
Lubienski, C. ( 2003). Instrumentalist perspectives on the "public" in public education: Incentives and purposes. Educational Policy, 17, 478-502
35.
Mäkelä, P. ( 2007). Collective agents and moral responsibility. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38, 456-468.
36.
Manna, P.F. ( 2002). The signals parents send when they choose their children’s schools. Educational Policy, 16, 425-447.
37.
March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. ( 1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press .
May, L., & Tuomela, R. ( 2007). Introduction. Journal of Social Philosophy , 38, 365-368.
40.
McConnell, G. ( 1966). Private power and American democracy. New York: Knopf.
41.
McDermott, K.A. ( 1999). Controlling public education: Localism versus equity . Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
42.
Meier, D.1995. The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon .
43.
Meier, K. ( 2004). Structure, politics, and policy: The logic of mayoral control. In J. Henig & W. Rich (Eds.), Mayors in the middle (pp. 221-231). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Mintrom, M. ( 2003). Market organizations and deliberative democracy: Choice and voice in public service delivery. Administration and Society , 35, 52-81.
45.
Moe, T.M. ( 2000). The two democratic purposes of public education. In L. M. McDonnell, P. M. Timpane, & R. Benjamin (Eds.), Rediscovering the democratic purposes of education (Chap. 6). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
46.
Nathan, J. ( 1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
47.
Pettit, P. ( 2007). Responsibility incorporated. Ethics, 117, 171-201.
48.
Portz, J. ( 2004). Boston: Agenda-setting and school reform in mayor-centric system. In J. Henig & W. Rich (Eds.), Mayors in the middle (pp. 96-119). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Orr, M. ( 2004). Baltimore: The limits of mayoral control. In J. Henig & W. Rich (Eds.), Mayors in the middle (pp. 27-58). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Quinn, R.E. ( 2000). Change the world: How ordinary people can accomplish extraordinary results. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
Riehl, C.J. ( 2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70, 55-81.
52.
Sadler, B.J. ( 2007). Collective responsibility, universalizability, and social practice. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38, 486-503.
53.
Schoen, L., & Fusarelli, L.D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-Century schools in an era of accountability . Educational Policy, 22, 181-203.
54.
Shapiro, I. ( 1999). Democratic justice. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
55.
Spillane, J.P., Diamond, J.B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. ( 2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16, 731-762.
56.
Stone, C.N. ( 2004). Mayors and the challenge of modernization. In J. Henig & W. Rich (Eds.), Mayors in the middle (pp. 232-248). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Stone, C.N., Henig, J.R., Jones, B.D., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
58.
Taylor, C. ( 2005). Walking the talk: Building a culture for success. London: Random House Business Books.
59.
Thompson, D.F. ( 1980). Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. American Political Science Review, 74, 905-916.
60.
Tyack, D.B. ( 1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Tyack, D.B., & Cuban, L. ( 1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Vergari, S. (Ed.). (2002). The charter school landscape. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
63.
Vergari, S. ( 2007). The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy, 21, 15-39.
64.
Weatherly, R., & Lipsky, M. ( 1977). Street level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 171-197.
65.
Weick, K.E. ( 2001). Leadership as the legitimation of doubt. In W. G. Bennis, G. M. Spreitzer , & T. G. Cummings (Eds.), The future of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66.
West, M. R., & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.). (2003). No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
67.
Wong, K., & Shen, F. ( 2003). Big city mayors and school governance reform: The case of school district takeover. Peabody Journal of Education , 78(4), 89-119.
68.
Wong, K., Shen, F., Anagnostopoulus, D., & Rutledge, S. ( 2007). The education mayor: Improving America’s schools . Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
