Background: Leaving Children Behind: How “Texas-Style” Accountability Fails Latino Youth, edited by Angela Valenzuela, presents federal-, state-, district-, and school-level research on the effects of performance accountability systems featuring high-stakes testing on Latina/Latino students. Drawing on empirical work from studies in Texas and California, the authors argue forcefully that the state policy systems purported to eliminate longstanding inequities in educational services provided poor and minority students are instead creating perverse incentives that exacerbate the achievement gap for language minority students and others.
Purpose:In this book review and policy commentary, the reviewer examines the evidence provided in various chapters, offering an array of perspectives on the policy, politics, and effects on practice of what the authors term “Texas-style accountability.”
Analysis and Findings:Reconsidering the portrayal of this type of system as a Texas phenomenon foisted on the nation through the No Child Left Behind legislation, performance accountability is situated in a broader public-sector reform movement, termed New Public Management (NPM) by Hood (1991).
Conclusions:The reviewer suggests that Leaving Children Behind is important reading for practicing administrators, those who prepare them, and those who make and research educational policy.
Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 689-718.
2.
Anderson, G. (2001). Promoting educational equity in a period of growing social inequity: The silent contradictions of Texas reform discourse. Education and Urban Society, 33, 320-332.
3.
Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 161(1), 67-93.
4.
Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18, 12-44.
5.
Ball, S. J. (1990a). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. New York: Routledge.
6.
Ball, S. J. (1990b). Managementas moral technology. In S. J. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 153-167). New York: Routledge.
7.
Ball, S. J. (1993). Education policy, power relations and teacher’s work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 106-121.
8.
Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
9.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228.
10.
Bates, R. (1996, November 25-29). The educational costs of managerialism. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the Educational Research Association and the Australian Association for Research in Education, Singapore.
11.
Black, W. B. (2005). Being accountable and performing accountability at Marquez Elementary: The contradictory implications of “success” for democratic notions of bilingual education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
12.
Bohte, J., & Meier, K. (2000). Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating. Public Administration Review, 60, 173-182.
13.
Bottery, M. (2003). The leadership of learning communities in a culture of unhappiness. School Leadership and Management, 23(2), 187-207.
14.
Bush, G. W. (2001). No child left behind. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
15.
Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Cibulka, J., & Derlin, R. (1998). Accountability policy adoption to policy sustainability: Reforms and systemic initiatives in Colorado and Maryland. Education and Urban Society, 30, 502-515.
17.
Court, M. (2004). Talking back to new public management versions of accountability: A coprincipalship’s practices of mutual responsibility. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 32(2), 171-194.
18.
Cronin, J. M. (1973). The control of urban schools: Perspective on the power of educational reformers. New York: Free Press.
19.
Dawson, S., & Dargie, C. (2002). New public management: A discussion with special reference to UK health. In K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 34-56). New York: Routledge.
20.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Elmore, R. F. (1995). Structural reform and educational practice. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 23-26.
22.
English, F. W. (2003). The challenge of postmodernism to the theory and practice of educational administration. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
23.
Eriksen, E. O. (2001). Leadership in a communicative perspective. Acta Sociologica, 44, 21-35.
24.
Foley, D. E. (1990). Learning capitalist culture deep in the heart of Tejas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
The Fordham Foundation. (2003). Better leaders for America’s schools: A manifesto. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
26.
Foster, W. P. (1980). Administration and the crisis in legitimacy: A review of Habermasian thought. Harvard Educational Review, 50(4), 496-505.
27.
Foster, W. P. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
28.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd Vintage ed.). New York: Vintage Books.
29.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (1st American ed., Vol. 1). New York: Pantheon Books.
30.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
31.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 87-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Fuhrman, S. H. (1999). The new accountability (CPRE Policy Brief). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
33.
Fullan, M. (1995). The school as a learning organization: Distant dreams. Theory Into Practice, 34(4), 230-235.
34.
Fusarelli, L. D. (2002). Tightly coupled policy in loosely coupled systems: Institutional capacity and organizational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 561-575.
35.
Fusarelli, L. D., & Johnson, B. (2004). Educational governance and the new public management. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 9(2), 118-127.
36.
Gee, J. P. (1999, November). Literacies, schools, and kinds of people in the new capitalism. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, Chicago, IL.
37.
Gewirtz, S., & Ball, S. J. (2000). From “welfarism” to “new managerialism”: Shifting discourses of school headship in the education marketplace. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(3), 253-268.
38.
Grissmer, D. W., Flanagan, A., Kawata, J., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
39.
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
40.
Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved from http://eepa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41.htm
41.
Hill, P. T. (1997). A public education system for the new metropolis. Education and Urban Society, 29, 490-508.
42.
Hill, P. T., Pierce, L. C., & Guthrie, J. W. (1997). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America’s schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
44.
Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of the new public management: Into the age of paradox?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267-282.
45.
Jimenez, R. (2000). Literacy and the identity development of Latina/o students. American Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 971-1000.
46.
Kaboolian, L. (1998). The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management vs. administration debate. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 189-193.
47.
Katz, M. B. (1971). School reform: Past and present. Boston: Little, Brown.
48.
Kindler, A. (2002). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services 2000-2001 summary report (Commissioned report). Washington, DC: Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students.
49.
Klein, S., Hamilton, L., McCaffrey, D., & Stecher, B. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us?Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
50.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1, 249-280.
52.
Leithwood, K., Steinbach, R., & Jantzi, D. (2002). School leadership and teachers’ motivation to implement accountability policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 94-119.
53.
Levin, B. (2005). The future of Canadian educational policy in counterpoint. UCEA Review, 45(1), 13-15.
54.
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders (Report). Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.
55.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
56.
Littler, C. R. (1978). Understanding Taylorism. British Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 185-202.
57.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.
59.
Luke, A. (2002). Curriculum, ethics, metanarrative: Teaching and learning beyond the nation. Retrieved March 31, 2005, from http://www.education.tas.gov.au/english/luke.htm
60.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
61.
Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 797-750.
62.
Mawhinney, H. B. (2005). Scaling up education policy futures to inform a new vernacular for North American geopolitical socioeconomics. UCEA Review, 45(1), 15-17.
63.
Maxcy, B. D. (2004). Emerging democracy in an urban elementary school: A Habermasian framework for examining school governance reculturing in response to systemic reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
64.
McNeil, L. M. (1982). Contradictions of control: The organizational context of school knowledge. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Public Policy.
65.
McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
66.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
67.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41-61). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Moll, L. C., Armanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
69.
Moos, L. (2003). Educational leadership: Leadership for/as bildung?International Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 19-33.
70.
Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224-243.
71.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
72.
Osborne, S. P., & McLaughlin, K. (2002). The new public management in context. In K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 7-14). New York: Routledge.
73.
O’Sullivan, F. (2005). Education leadership preparation: A view from the UK. UCEA Review, 45(1), 17-20.
74.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
75.
Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
76.
Power, S., Halpin, D., & Whitty, G. (1997). Managing the state and the market: “New” education management in five countries. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(4), 342-362.
77.
Reitzug, U. C., & Capper, C. A. (1996). Deconstructing site-based management: Possibilities for emancipation and alternative means of control. International Journal of Educational Reform, 5(1), 56-69.
78.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138-151.
79.
Scheurich, J. J. (1995). The knowledge base in educational administration: Postpositivist reflections. In R. Donmoyer, M. Imber, & J. Scheurich (Eds.), The knowledge base for educational administration: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 17-31). Albany: State University of New York Press.
80.
Scheurich, J. J., & Skrla, L. (2001). Continuing the conversation on equity and accountability: Listening appreciatively, responding responsibly. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(4), 322-326.
81.
Scheurich, J. J., Skrla, L., & Johnson, J. (2000). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 293-299.
82.
Scribner, J. P., Cockrell, K. S., Cockrell, D. H., & Valentine, J. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 130-157.
83.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J., Johnson, J., Hogan, D., Koschoreck, J., & Smith, P. (2000). Equity driven achievement focused school districts: A report on systemic school success in four Texas school districts serving diverse student populations. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center.
84.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., Johnson, J.F.J., & Koschoreck, J. W. (2001). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice?International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 237-260.
85.
Taylor, F. W. (1998). The principles of scientific management. Mineola, NY: Dover.
86.
Terry, L. D. (1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 194-200.
87.
Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
Ungerleider, C. (2005). Education policy trends from a Western Canadian perspective. UCEA Review, 45(1), 11-13.
90.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). The foreign-born population: 2000. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-34.pdf
91.
Valencia, R. R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (Vol. 19). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
92.
Valencia, R. R. (2000). Inequalities and the schooling of minority students in Texas: Historical and contemporary conditions. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22(4), 445-459.
93.
Valencia, R. R., Valenzuela, A., Sloan, K., & Foley, D. E. (2001). Let’s treat the cause, not the symptoms: Equity and accountability in Texas revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(4), 318-323.
94.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
95.
Waite, D., Boone, M., & McGhee, M. (2001). A critical sociocultural view of accountability. Journal of School Leadership, 11, 182-203.
96.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
97.
Willis, P. E. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
98.
Young, M., Crow, G., Orr, T., Ogawa, R. T., & Creighton, T. (2005). An educative look at “Educating school leaders.”Columbia, MO: The University Council for Educational Administration.
