The long-sustained effort of conservatives and their think tanks and media outlets to win support for school choice, market forces, and privatization schemes in education is paying off. But it is encountering steady resistance from the public education establishment and its supporting teachers’ unions. Actions, reactions, strategies, and the unfolding political struggle between these adversaries are the subjects of this brief overview of this topic.
Betts, J., Rice, L. A., Zau, A. C., Tange, Y. E., & Koedel, C. R. (2006). Does school choice work? Effects on student integration and achievement. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved November 15, 2006, from http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=460
2.
Bolick, C. (2006a, June 22). Democrats for (school) choice. The Wall Street Journal, p. A17-A17.
3.
Bolick, C. (2006b, July 12). Remedial education. The Wall Street Journal, p. A16-A16.
4.
Bolick, C. (2006c, November 1). School uniform. The Wall Street Journal, p. A18-A18.
5.
Boyd, W. L. (1988). How to reform schools without half trying: Secrets of the Reagan administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24, 299-309.
6.
Boyd, W. L. (2003). Public education’s crisis of performance and legitimacy: Introduction and overview of the yearbook. In W. L. Boyd & D. Miretzky (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges (102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1; pp. 1-19). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
7.
Boyd, W. L., & Kerchner, C. T. (Eds.). (1988). The politics of excellence and choice in education (1st yearbook of the Politics of Education Association). New York: Falmer.
8.
Chastain, K. (2006, Fall). Scholars caution about contracting educational services. Philadelphia Public School Notebook. Retrieved October 20, 2006, from http://www.thenotebook.org/editions/2006/fall/
9.
Christman, J., Gold, E., & Herold, B. (2006). Privatization “Philly style”: What can be learned from Philadelphia’s diverse provider model of school management?Philadelphia: Research for Action. Retrieved September 18, 2006, from www.researchforaction.org
10.
Clark, D., & Astuto, T. (1986, October). The significance and permanence of changes in federal education policy. Educational Researcher, pp. 4-13.
11.
Chubb, J., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
Friedman, M. (1980). Free to choose: A personal statement. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
13.
Gold, E., Christman, J., & Herold, B. (in press). Blurring the boundaries: A case study of private sector involvement in Philadelphia public schools. American Journal of Education.
14.
Hassel, B., & Toch, T. (2006). Big box: How the heirs of the Wal-Mart fortune have fueled the charter school movement. Connecting the dots. Washington, DC: Education Sector. Retrieved October 21, 2006, from http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/CTDWalton.pdf
15.
Hess, F. M. (Ed.). (2006). Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Hill, P. (2006). Put learning first: A portfolio approach to public schools. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
17.
Houston, P. D. (1998, September). Preserving public education, not public schools. The School Administrator. Retrieved March 27, 2006, from http://www.aasa.org
18.
Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Maxwell, L. (2006). Charter school activist gains new influence in L.A. Education Week, 26(11), 1-1, 16-17.
20.
Mezzacappa, D. (2006). Market forces: Professor Paul Peterson’s influential protégés. Connecting the dots. Washington, DC: Education Sector. Retrieved November 18, 2006, from http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/PetersonDots.pdf
21.
Murray, C. (2006, November 7). Study: Virtual-school enrollment explodes. eSchool Newsonline. Available at www.eschoolnews.com/news/PFshowstory.cfm?ArticleID=6708
22.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
23.
Peterson, P. E., & Llaudet, E. (2006, August). On the public-private school achievement debate. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA. Available at http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/PEPG06-02-PetersonLlaudet.pdf
24.
Snyder, S. (2006, November 15). Private managers in district face cuts. Philadelphia Inquirer.
25.
Spellings exemptions: Another failure to enforce No Child Left Behind. (2006, October 31). The Wall Street Journal, p. A18-A18.
26.
Van Geel, T., & Boyd, W. L. (2002, September 4). Vouchers and the entanglement of church and state. Education Week, pp. 46-46, 49-49.
27.
Whitty, G. (2000, November). Privatization and marketization in education policy. Paper presented at NUT conference, Involving the Private Sector in Education: Value Added or High Risk?London.
28.
Wilgoren, J. (2000, October 9). Young Blacks turn to school vouchers as civil rights issue. The New York Times, p. A1-A1.
