Substantial policy and political changes have resulted from a 2001 state takeover of the Philadelphia School District and the subsequent hiring of Paul Vallas as the district’s new CEO. Using the lens of urban regime analysis, which emphasizes the importance of public and private actors in forming a governing coalition, this article analyzes the Philadelphia education regime and the policies it has promoted. The author determines that although decision making is highly centralized under this governing coalition, the role of private actors helps to define the regime as a “contracting regime,” in which public-private interaction shapes the political and policy context.
Boyd, W. L., & Christman, J. B. (2003). A tall order for Philadelphia’s new approach to school governance: Heal the political rifts, close the budget gap, and improve the schools. In L. Cuban & M. Usdan (Eds.), Powerful reforms with shallow roots: Improving America’s urban schools (pp. 96-124). New York City: Teachers College Press.
2.
Brennan, C. (2002, July 25). Vallas kills consulting pact sought by Edison Schools. Daily News, p. 3-3.
3.
Brown, M. (1999). Reconceptualizing public and private in urban regime theory: Governance in AIDS politics. Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 70-87.
4.
Bulkley, K. E., Mundell, L. M., & Riffer, M. (2004). Contracting out schools: The first year of the Philadelphia Diverse Provider Model (Research brief). Philadelphia: Research for Action.
5.
Burch, P. E. (2005). The new educational privatization: Educational Contracting and high stakes accountability. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12259
6.
Burns, P. (2002). The intergovernmental regime and public policy in Hartford, Connecticut. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(1), 55-73.
7.
Burns, P. (2003). Regime theory, state government, and a takeover of urban education. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 285-303.
8.
Casserly, M. (2005). Beating the odds V. Washington, DC: Council of Great City Schools.
9.
Christman, J. B. (2001). Powerful ideas, modest gains: Five years of systemic reform in Philadelphia middle schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
10.
Christman, J. B., Gold, E., & Herold, B. (2005). Privatization “Philly style”: What can be learned from Philadelphia’s diverse provider model of school management? (Research brief). Philadelphia: Research for Action.
11.
Christman, J. B., & Rhodes, A. (2002). Civic engagement and urban school improvement: Hard-to-learn lessons from Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
12.
Corcoran, T., & Christman, J. B. (2002). The limits and contradictions of systemic reform: The Philadelphia story. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
13.
Feigenbaum, H. B., & Henig, J. R. (1994). The political underpinnings of privatization: A typology. World Politics, 46(2), 185-208.
14.
Gold, E., Christman, J. B., & Herold, B. (in press). Blurring the boundaries: Private sector involvement in Philadelphia public schools. American Journal of Education.
15.
Gold, E., Cucchiara, M., Simon, E., & Riffer, M. (2005). Time to engage? Civic participation in Philadelphia’s school reform (Research brief). Philadelphia: Research for Action.
16.
Henig, J. R. (1989). Privatization in the United States: Theory and practice. Political Science Quarterly, 104(4), 649-670.
17.
Henig, J. R., Holyoke, T. T., Brown, H., & Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2005). The influence of founder type on charter school structures and operations. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 487-523.
18.
Henig, J. R., Holyoke, T. T., Lacireno-Paquet, N., & Moser, M. (2003). Privatization, politics, and urban services: The political behavior of charter schools. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(1), 37-54.
19.
Henig, J. R., Hula, R. C., Orr, M., & Pedescleaux, D. S. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Hill, P. T., Campbell, C., & Harvey, J. (2000). It takes a city: Getting serious about urban school reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
21.
Hill, P. T., Pierce, L., & Guthrie, J. (1997). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America’s schools (RAND research study). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Maranto, R. (2005). A tale of two cities: School privatization in Philadelphia and Chester. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 151-190.
23.
Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36(6), 810-835.
24.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Research for Action. (2005). The “original 86”. Philadelphia: Author.
26.
Rufos-Lignos, P., & Richards, C. E. (2003). Emerging forms of school organization. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 753-781.
27.
Shipps, D. (2003a). Pulling together: Civic capacity and urban school reform. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 841-878.
28.
Shipps, D. (2003b). Regime change: Mayoral takeover of the Chicago Public Schools. In J. G. Cibulka & W. L. Boyd (Eds.), A race against time: The crisis in urban schooling (pp. 106-128). Westport, CT: Praeger.
29.
Simon, E., Gold, E., Mundell, L. M., Riffer, M., & Cucchiara, M. (2004, April). Civic engagement under Philadelphia’s current educational regime. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Washington, DC.
30.
Smith, M., & O’Day, J. (1991). Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
31.
Snyder, S. (2006a, June 6). Phila. school budget narrowly passes. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. B04-B04.
32.
Snyder, S. (2006b, June 5). Phila. school budget remains elusive. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. B01-B01.
33.
Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
34.
Stone, C. N. (1996, August). The politics of urban school reform: Civic capacity, social capital, and the inter-group conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Associations, San Francisco.
35.
Stone, C. N. (1998a). Changing urban education. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
36.
Stone, C. N. (1998b). Introduction: Urban education in political context. In C. N. Stone (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 1-20). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
37.
Stone, C. N. (2001). Civic capacity and urban education, 2003. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/stone/prolo.html
38.
Stone, C. N. (2005). Looking back to look forward: Reflections on urban regime analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 40(3), 309-341.
39.
Stone, C. N., Henig, J. R., Jones, B. D., & Perannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
40.
Travers, E. (2003, November). The state takeover in Philadelphia: Where we are and how we got here. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://www.researchforaction.org/PSR/PublishedWorks/ST031004.pdf
41.
Useem, E. (2005). Learning from Philadelphia’s school reform: What do the research findings show so far? (Occasional paper). Philadelphia: Research for Action.
42.
Useem, E., Christman, J. B., & Boyd, W. L. (2006). The role of district-level leadership in making radical reform work: Philadelphia’s education reform under the state takeover, 2001-2006 [Working paper]. Philadelphia: Temple University, Laboratory for Student Success.
43.
Useem, E., & Rinko, K. (2006). Turning to outside organizations to do more jobs. Philadelphia Public School Notebook. Retrieved October 13, 2006, from http://www.thenotebook.org/editions/2006/fall/turning_outside.htm
44.
Wirt, F., & Kirst, M. (1997). The political dynamics of American education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
45.
Wohlstetter, P., Malloy, C. L., Smith, J., & Hentschke, G. (2004). Incentives for charter schools: Building school capacity through cross-sectoral alliances. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 321-365.
