State takeovers of local school districts represent one of the most recent kinds of education reform. Americans favor both local control over education and state takeovers of failing schools. African American leaders tend to oppose takeovers, but survey data suggest that African American citizens support greater state influence over local education. To explain these paradoxes, this study examines conditions under which jurisdictions support state intervention. It concludes that opposition to this reform emanates from jurisdictions where large percentages of African American voters turn out at high rates. The percentage of a jurisdiction’s schools eligible for takeover because of academic deficiencies exerts a statistically insignificant effect on aggregate-level votes for intervention.
American Teacher. (2002). Community uproar: Philadelphia school privatization plan met with widespread opposition . Retrieved July 17, 2005, from http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_teacher/feb02/community.html.
2.
Anderson, E. ( 2003, July 15). Nagin may sue city tax assessors: Low property values mean lost revenue. Times-Picayune, p. 1.
3.
Anderson, A.B., &. Lewis, A.C. ( 1997). Academic bankruptcy policy brief. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/15/a9/3a.pdf
4.
Banducci, S. ( 1998). Search for ideological consistency in direct legislation voting. In S. Bowler, T. Donovan, & C. Tolbert (Eds.), Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States (pp. 139-148). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
5.
Berman, D.R. ( 1995). Takeovers of local governments: An overview and evaluation of state policies. Publius, 25, 55-70.
6.
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. ( 1994). Information and opinion change on ballot propositions . Political Behavior, 16, 411-435.
7.
Burns, P. ( 2002). The intergovernmental regime and public policy in Hartford, Connecticut. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 55-73.
8.
Burns, P. ( 2003). Regime theory, state government, and a takeover of urban education. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 285-303.
9.
Bushweller, K. ( 1998). Under the shadow of the state: Do state takeovers work ? American School Board Journal, 185, 16-19.
10.
Duncan, G., Brooks-Gunn, J., Yeung, W.J., & Smith, J. ( 1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children? American Sociological Review, 63, 406-423.
11.
Gallup Organization. (1995, May 25-June 15). How about the state government? Would you like the state government to have more influence or less influence in determining the educational programs of the local schools?
12.
Gallup Organization. (2003, May 28-June 18). In your opinion, who should have the greatest influence in deciding what is taught in the public schools here-the federal government, the state government, or the local school board?Accessed Lexis-Nexis .
13.
Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. ( 1995). The determinants of children’s attainments: A review of methods and findings. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 1829-1878.
14.
Hendrie, C. ( 1996, June 1). Ill will comes with territory in takeovers. Education Week, 12, pp. 12-13.
15.
Henig, J. R., & Rich, W. C. (Eds.). (2004). Mayors in the middle: Politics, race, and mayoral control of urban schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Hochschild, J., & Danielson, M.N. (1998). Can we desegregate public schools and subsidize housing? Lessons from the sorry history of Yonkers, New York. In C. N. Stone (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 23-44). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
17.
Horizon Initiative New Orleans. (2007, March). New Orleans public schools. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://www.horizoninitiative.com/pdfs/education_presentation.pdf
18.
International Communications Research. (2003 , August 7-October 15). When a school fails to meet performance standards would you agree or disagree that . . . a community group, a private company or the state should be able to take over if a school fails to improve for several years? AccessedLexis-Nexis.
19.
Karp, J. ( 1995). Explaining public support for legislative term limits . Public Opinion Quarterly, 28, 355-378.
20.
Leising, M. ( 2003, January 24). Troubled schools want it both ways: District wants to keep local control, though state legislators are unlikely to go along with such a plan. Contra Costa Times, 1.
21.
Louisiana Department of Education. (n.d.). School standards, accountability, and assistance: Louisiana’s school, district, and state accountability system. Retrieved http://www.doe.state.la.us/lde/ssaa/582.html.
22.
Louisiana Federation of Teachers. (2003, April 4). Weekly legislative digest. Retrieved http://www.lft-aft.org/.
23.
Lupia, A. ( 1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63-76.
24.
McDermott, K.A. ( 1999). Controlling public education: Localism versus equity . Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
25.
McGill, K. ( 2003, April 22). Senate OKs BESE takeover measure. TheAssociated Press State and Local Wire.
26.
Morris, P., Duncan, G.J., & Rodrigues, C. ( 2006). Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on children’s achievement with data from random-assignment experiments . Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://chicagobwinequalityworkshop.googlepages.com/dec2006Duncan.pdf
27.
Nicholson-Crotty, S., & Meier, K.J. ( 2002). Size doesn’t matter In defense of single-state studies. State Politics and Policy Quarterly , 2, 411-422.
28.
Olson, L. ( 1996, September 11). State takeovers run afoul of Voting Rights Act. Education Week. Retrieved June 9, 2009 , from http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-16/02vote.h16 .
29.
Orr, M. ( 1999). Black social capital: The politics of school reform in Baltimore, 1986-1998. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
30.
Rasheed, A. ( 2003a, September 21). BESE seizure of schools going to vote: Dramatic reform needed to stem academic failings, supporters say. Times-Picayune, p. 1.
31.
Rasheed, A. ( 2003b, September 24). Panel debates school takeover plan: Opponents of strategy say it’s unproven. Times-Picayune, p. 1.
32.
Rasheed, A. ( 2003c, October 7). School takeover backers celebrate: Amendment approval seen as cry for help. Times-Picayune, p. 1.
33.
Reinhard, B. ( 1998, January 14). Racial issues cloud state takeovers. Education Week. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-17/18minor.h17.
34.
Rich, W.C. ( 1996). Black mayors and school politics: The failure of reform in Detroit, Gary, and Newark. New York: Garland Publishing.
35.
Seder, R.C. ( 2000). Balancing accountability and local control: State intervention for financial and academic stability (Policy Study No. 268). Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
36.
Stone, C.N. ( 1998). Introduction: Urban education in political context. In C. N. Stone (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 1-22). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
37.
Stone, C.N., Henig, J.R., Jones, B.D., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
38.
Tolbert, C.J., McNeal, R.S., & Smith, D.A. ( 2003). Enhancing civic engagement: The effect of direct democracy on political participation. State Politics and Policy Quarterly , 3, 23-41.
39.
Waller, M. ( 2004, January 14). BESE begins to pave way for takeovers: Panel OKs plan for applications to run 14 failing N.O. schools. Times-Picayune, p. 1.
40.
Wong, K.K., & X. Shen, F.X. (2001, August-September). Does school district takeover work? Assessing the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
41.
Ziebarth, T. ( 2004). State takeovers and reconstitutions policy brief. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/51/67/5167.htm.
