The prospect of overseeing the rapid preparation of many participants in fast-track alternative certification programs presents several challenges for state education officials who seek to maintain, or even enhance, the quality of the state’s teaching force. This study examined a range of fast-track alternative teacher certification programs in 11 sites in three states—Connecticut, Louisiana, and Massachusetts. We found that participants were attracted by the incentives of the fast-track programs but also expected to have coursework and student-teaching experiences that would prepare them well to teach in September. Overall, candidates were satisfied with what the programs offered, though many wanted more preparation in content-based pedagogy and better student-teaching placements. There were advantages and disadvantages to centralized and decentralized approaches by the states to ensure quality of participants.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1998). The case against teacher certification. Public Interest, (132), 17-29.
2.
Bliss, T. (1990). Alternative certification in Connecticut: Reshaping the profession. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 35-54.
3.
Buice, J. B. (2003, April). An alternative quest for quality: Recruiting, selecting and training new teachers in New York City’s Teaching Fellows Program. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Conference, Chicago.
4.
Cronin, J. (1983). State regulation of teacher preparation. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 171-192). New York: Longman.
5.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Debating the evidence. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 28-56.
6.
Decker, P. T., Mayer, D. P., & Glazerman, S. (2004). The effects of Teach for America on students: Findings from a national evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
7.
Dill, V. S. (1994). Teacher education in Texas: A new paradigm. Educational Forum, 58(2), 146-154.
8.
Farkas, S., Johnson, J., Foleno, T., Duffett, A., & Foley, P. (2000). A sense of calling: Who teaches and why. New York: Public Agenda.
9.
Feistritzer, C. E., & Chester, D. T. (2003). Executive summary: Alternative teacher certification: A state-by-state analysis 2003. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
10.
Fowler, R. C. (2003, April 22). The Massachusetts Signing Bonus Program for New Teachers: A model of teacher preparation worth copying? Retrieved July 15, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n13/
11.
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1999). Teacher licensing and student achievement. In M. Kanstoroom & C. E. Finn, Jr. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 83-102). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
12.
Hawley, W. (1990). The theory and practice of alternative certification: Implications for the improvement of teaching. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 3-34.
13.
Hussar, W. J. (1999). Predicting the need for newly hired teachers in the United States to 2008-09. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
14.
Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). The effectiveness of “Teach for America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37), 56.
16.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
17.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structure of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Murnane, R. J., Singer, J. D., Willett, J. B., Kemple, J. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Natriello, G., & Zumwalt, K. (1993). New teachers for urban schools: The contribution of the provisional teacher program in New Jersey. Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 49-62.
23.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, Sect. 2111 (2001). Available at www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
24.
Peske, H. G. (2002). Connecticut’s alternative route to certification: A case study. Unpublished paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
25.
Rice, J. K., & Brent, B. O. (2002). An alternative avenue to teacher certification: A cost analysis of the Pathways to Teaching Careers Program. Journal of Education Finance, 27(4), 1029-1049.
26.
Saphier, J., & Gower, R. R. (1997). The skillful teacher: Building your teaching skills. Carlisle, MA: Research for Better Teaching.
27.
Seftor, N. S., & Mayer, D. P. (2003). The effect of alternative certification on student achievement: A literature review (No. Ed-01-CO-0039). Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
28.
Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: A conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator, 10(Spring), 9-15, 43-44.
30.
Stafford, D., & Barrow, G. (1994). Houston’s alternative certification program. Educational Forum, 58(2), 193-200.
31.
Stoddart, T. (1990). Los Angeles Unified School District Intern Program: Recruiting and preparing teachers for an urban context. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 84-122.
32.
Zumwalt, K. (1991). Alternative routes to teaching: Three alternative approaches. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 83-92.
