This study examines how remote workers’ segmentation boundary management enactment relates to job satisfaction and turnover intention, comparing the COVID-19 pandemic with the post-pandemic period. Across two surveys, segmentation enactment was positively associated with job satisfaction during the pandemic but negatively after the pandemic, while it was positively related to turnover in both phases. Work–nonwork balance consistently mediated the relationships between segmentation enactment and both outcomes. Emotional supervisor support amplified the benefits of segmentation enactment for work–nonwork balance during the pandemic, whereas instrumental supervisor support became more influential after the pandemic. Emotional family support showed consistent moderating effects across periods, such that segmentation enactment was more beneficial for workers with low family support. This research demonstrates that the effectiveness of segmentation enactment and social support varies depending on the timing of implementation and highlights the importance of considering environmental factors in the work–nonwork interface of remote workers.
AllenT. D.MerloK.LawrenceR. C.SlutskyJ.GrayC. E. (2021). Boundary management and work‐nonwork balance while working from home. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12300
3.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/259305
4.
BaggerJ.LiA. (2014). How does supervisory family support influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. Journal of Management, 40(4), 1123–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311413922
5.
BoceanC. G.PopescuL.VarzaruA. A.CostinD. A.IancuA. (2023). Work-life balance and employee satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 15(15), 11631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511631
6.
BoyarS. L.Maertz JrC. P.PearsonA. W.KeoughS. (2003). Work-family conflict: A model of linkages between work and family domain variables and turnover intentions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(2), 175–190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604424
7.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
8.
CheungG. W.LauR. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343
9.
ChiO. H.SaldamliA.GursoyD. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on management-level hotel employees’ work behaviors: Moderating effects of working-from-home. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 98, 103020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103020
10.
ChoE. (2020). Examining boundaries to understand the impact of COVID-19 on vocational behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119(1), 103437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103437
DienerE.LucasR. E.ScollonC. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305
13.
GriggsT. L.CasperW. J.EbyL. T. (2013). Work, family and community support as predictors of work–family conflict: A study of low-income workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.006
14.
HammerL. B.Ernst KossekE.BodnerT.CrainT. (2013). Measurement development and validation of the family supportive supervisor behavior short-form (FSSB-SF). Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032612
15.
HammerL. B.KossekE. E.YraguiN. L.BodnerT. E.HansonG. C. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of Management, 35(4), 837–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328510
16.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ.-P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
17.
HuJ.ChiangJ. T.-J.LiuY.WangZ.GaoY. (2023). Double challenges: How working from home affects dual-earner couples’ work-family experiences. Personnel Psychology, 76(1), 141–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12559
18.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
19.
JudgeT. A.LockeE. A.DurhamC. C.KlugerA. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17
20.
KaneG. C.NandaR.PhillipsA.CopulskyJ. (2021). Redesigning the post-pandemic workplace. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(3), 12–14.
21.
KangasH.PensarH.RousiR. (2023). I wouldn’t be working this way if I had a family—Differences in remote workers’ needs for supervisor’s family-supportiveness depending on the parental status. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 147(4), 103939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103939
22.
KingL. A.MattimoreL. K.KingD. W.AdamsG. A. (1995). Family support inventory for workers: A new measure of perceived social support from family members. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160306
23.
KossekE. E.LautschB. A.EatonS. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002
24.
KossekE. E.PerriginoM. B.LautschB. A. (2023). Work-life flexibility policies from a boundary control and implementation perspective: A review and research framework. Journal of Management, 49(6), 2062–2108. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221140354
25.
KreinerG. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.386
26.
LeroyS.SchmidtA. M.MadjarN. (2021). Working from home during COVID-19: A study of the interruption landscape. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(10), 1448–1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000972
27.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
28.
LittletonH.RiccaB.AllenA. B.BenightC. (2023). Recovery and adjustment trajectories among hurricane Florence survivors: Analysis utilizing nonlinear dynamic system modeling. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 36(3), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22926
29.
LiuC. C.LiX.LiuT.ChenY. W. (2016). Influence of work–family conflict on job involvement and organizational commitment: The moderating effect of perceived supervisor support and the mediating effect of job satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 1732–1736). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798174
30.
LiuD.MorgesonF. P.ZhuJ.FanX. (2023). Event-oriented organizational behavior research: A multilevel review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 2148–2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231162094
31.
McIlroyT. D.ParkerS. L.McKimmieB. M. (2024). Ask, but you might not receive: Unanswered supervisor support scale development and a daily diary study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 40(1), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09950-x
32.
MorgesonF. P.MitchellT. R.LiuD. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0099
33.
Olson-BuchananJ. B.BoswellW. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.006
34.
RothbardN. P.BeetzA. M.HarariD. (2021). Balancing the scales: A configurational approach to work-life balance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-061833
35.
RyuE. (2015). The role of centering for interaction of level 1 variables in multilevel structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(4), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.936491
36.
ShockleyK. M.ClarkM. A.DoddH.KingE. B. (2021). Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000857
37.
SkaalvikE. M.SkaalvikS. (2023). Shared goals and values in the teaching profession, job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: The mediating role of psychological need satisfaction. Social Psychology of Education, 26(5), 1227–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09787-x
Ten BrummelhuisL. L.BakkerA. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974
40.
ValcourM. (2007). Work-based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours and satisfaction with work-family balance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1512–1523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1512
41.
WayneJ. H.RandelA. E.StevensJ. (2006). The role of identity and work–family support in work–family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.07.002
42.
WepferA. G.AllenT. D.BrauchliR.JennyG. J.BauerG. F. (2018). Work-life boundaries and well-being: Does work-to-life integration impair well-being through lack of recovery?Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(6), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9520-y
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
