Exploring Science Career Interest: Latent Profile Analysis of High School Occupational Preferences for Science

Abstract

The present study evaluates high school juniors and seniors (n = 295) to explore their preference for science as indicated by science motivation, attitude, academic experience, and interest. Latent profile analysis was used to model profiles of preferences for science with a person-centered approach. Then, the impact of self-concept variables was explored and four profiles of science interest were identified. Gender differences were of particular interest due to concerns noted in the literature, and some gender differences were identified in the present study. Covariate analysis indicated vocabulary ability and personality as significantly different for students in the high science interest profile. Implications of these results and future research directions are discussed.

Keywords

career development gender differences science interest latent profile analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

P. L.

Beier

M. E

. (2003). Intelligence, personality, and interests in the career choice process. Journal of Career Assessment, 11, 205–218.

Ackerman

P. L.

Heggestad

E. D.

(1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Belasco

A. S.

(2013). Creating college opportunity: School counselors and their influence on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 54, 781–804.

Bergman

L. R.

Magnusson

El Khouri

B. M.

(2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.

Braver

T. S.

Krug

M. K.

Chiew

K. S.

Kool

Westbrook

J. A.

Clement

N. J.

… Carver

C. S

. (2014). Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 443–472.

Breakwell

G. M.

Beardsell

(1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 183–197. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/2/003

Bryan

Moore-Thomas

Day-Vines

N. L.

Holcomb-McCoy

. (2011). School counselors as social capital: The effects of high school college counseling on college application rates. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89, 190–199.

Buday

S. K.

Stake

J. E.

Peterson

Z. D.

(2012). Gender and the choice of a science career: The impact of social support and possible selves. Sex Roles, 66, 197–209.

10.

Byars-Winston

. (2014). Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions. The Career Development Quarterly, 62, 340–357.

11.

Clark

S. L.

Muthén

(2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Retrieved from http://hbanaszak.mjr.uw.edu.pl/TempTxt/relatinglca.pdf

12.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13.

13.

Croll

(2008). Occupational choice, socio-economic status and educational attainment: A study of the occupational choices and destinations of young people in the British household panel survey. Research Papers in Education, 23, 243–268. doi:10.1080/02671520701755424

14.

Cross

S. E.

Madson

(1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5

15.

Feist

G. J.

(2012). Predicting interest in and attitudes toward science from personality and need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 771–775. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.005

16.

Glynn

S. M.

Brickman

Armstrong

Taasoobshirazi

(2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1159–1176. doi:10.1002/tea.20442

17.

Gorard

See

B. H.

(2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science Education, 45, 93–129.

18.

Gottfredson

L. S.

(1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579.

19.

Gottfredson

L. S.

(1996). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise. In Brown

Brooks

(Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 179–232). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

20.

Gottfredson

L. S.

(2005). Using Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise in career guidance and counseling. Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work, 71–100. Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2004theory.pdf

21.

Gottfredson

L. S.

Lapan

R. T.

(1997). Assessing gender-based circumscription of occupational aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 419–441.

22.

Henson

R. K.

(2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177–189.

23.

Hill

Corbett

St Rose

(2010). Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509653.pdf

24.

Hong

Lin

(2011). An investigation of students’ personality traits and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1001–1028. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.524949

25.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

26.

Hurwitz

Howell

(2014). Estimating causal impacts of school counselors with regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92, 316–327.

27.

Jensen

A. R.

(2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Oxford: Elsevier.

28.

Johnson

Christensen

(2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Jones

M. G.

Howe

Rua

M. J.

(2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180–192.

30.

Kessels

(2015). Bridging the gap by enhancing the fit: How stereotypes about STEM clash with stereotypes about girls. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7, 280–296.

31.

Lane

K. A.

Goh

J. X.

Driver-Linn

(2012). Implicit science stereotypes mediate the relationship between gender and academic participation. Sex Roles, 66, 220–234.

32.

Lapan

Whitcomb

Aleman

(2012). Connecticut professional school counselors: College and career counseling services and smaller ratios benefit students. Professional School Counseling, 16, 117–124.

33.

Leaper

Farkas

Brown

C. S.

(2012). Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 268–282. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z

34.

Legewie

DiPrete

T. A

. (2011). Gender differences in the effect of peer SES: Evidence from a second quasi-experimental case study (Working paper). Columbia University. Retrieved from http://www.irp.wisc.edu/newsevents/workshops/2011/participants/papers/7a-DiPreteJL_TD_chicago_02262011.pdf

35.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4, 255–311.

36.

Liedtka

K. D.

(2014, 11 1). Six steps to a colossal career program. Retrieved from https://www.schoolcounselor.org/magazine/blogs/november-december-2014/six-steps-to-a-colossal-career-program

37.

Maeda

Yoon

S. Y.

(2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT: R). Educational Psychology Review, 25, 69–94. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x

38.

Marsh

H. W.

(1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172.

39.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K. T.

Wen

. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2

40.

Marsh

H. W.

Lüdtke

Trautwein

Morin

A. J.

(2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 191–225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010

41.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

42.

Merz

E. L.

Roesch

S. C.

(2011). A latent profile analysis of the five factor model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 915–919. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022

43.

Miller

D. I.

Eagly

A. H.

Linn

M. C.

(2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 631–644. doi:10.1037/edu0000005

44.

Militello

Carey

Dimmitt

Lee

Schweid

(2009). Identifying exemplary school counseling practices in nationally recognized high schools. Journal of School Counseling, 7, 1–26.

45.

National Academy of Sciences. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

46.

National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. In Committee on STEM Education, Honey

Pearson

Schweingruber

(Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

47.

National Science Foundation. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering Indicators 2014. Report # NSB-2015-10. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2015/nsb201510.pdf

48.

Nosek

B. A.

Smyth

F. L.

Sriram

Lindner

N. M.

Devos

Ayala

… Greenwald

A. G

. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106

49.

Osborne

Simon

Collins

(2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199

50.

Patterson-Mills

Stasi

Peed

(2017). The addition of school counselors to the IL student support services funding formula in Illinois. Illinois School Counselor Association White Paper. Retrieved from http://www.ilschoolcounselor.org/resources/Resources/2017%2001%2025%20ISCA%20White%20Paper.pdf

51.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

52.

Potvin

Hasni

(2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50, 85–129. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626

53.

Reilly

Neumann

D. L.

(2013). Gender-role differences in spatial ability: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 68, 521–535.

54.

Riegle-Crumb

Moore

Ramos-Wada

(2010). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95, 458–476. doi:10.1002/sce.20431

55.

Robnett

R. D.

Leaper

(2013). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students’ STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 652–664. doi:10.1111/jora.12013

56.

Shavelson

R. J.

Hubner

J. J.

Stanton

G. C.

(1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

57.

Shipley

W. C.

Gruber

C. P.

Martin

T. A.

Klein

A. M.

(2009). Shipley-2 manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

58.

Simpkins

S. D.

Davis-Kean

P. E.

Eccles

J. S.

(2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70

59.

Simpson

R. D.

Steve Oliver

(1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1–18. doi:10.1002/sce.3730740102

60.

Singh

Granville

Dika

(2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323–332.

61.

Sirin

S. R.

(2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.

62.

Sterba

S. K.

(2013). Understanding linkages among mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 775–815. doi:10.1080/00273171.2013.827564

63.

Taylor

J. V

. (2014, 11 1). Connecting students to careers. Retrieved from https://www.schoolcounselor.org/magazine/blogs/november-december-2014/connecting-students-to-careers

64.

Tein

J. Y.

Coxe

Cham

(2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 640–657. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824781

65.

Twenge

J. M.

(1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.

66.

Valian

(2014). Interests, gender, and science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 225–230. doi:10.1177/1745691613519109

67.

Vitale

P. A.

Johnson

B. K

. (1988). Attitude toward science scale [Database record]. Retrieved from PsycTESTS. doi:10.1037/t10599-000

68.

Wai

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127

69.

White

K. R.

(1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.461

70.

Wilgenbusch

Merrell

K. W.

(1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 101–120. doi:10.1037/h0089000