Married couples consisting of female breadwinners and male primary caretakers are increasing in prevalence and visibility. However, little is known about the experiences of these families, particularly about salient challenges and dynamics related to this work–family arrangement. Through inductive qualitative analysis, the current study investigated the identity and adjustment experiences of this subset of working mothers. Fifty-one women responded to open-ended questions about their work and family experiences. The results highlighted psychological, vocational, and sociocultural phenomena related to this particular work–family arrangement including reasons guiding career and family decisions, positive and negative adjustment experiences, and perceptions of stigma. Relevant clinical and workplace policy implications also are provided.
BarnettR.HydeJ. (2001). Women, men, work, and family. American Psychologist, 56, 781–796.
2.
BrescollV.UhlmannE. (2005). Attitudes toward traditional and nontraditional parents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 436–445.doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00244.x
3.
CinamonG.RichY. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work-family conflict. Sex Roles, 11, 531–541.doi: 10.1023/A:1022021804846
4.
CorrellS.BenardS.PaikI. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.doi: 10.1177/0001699310365627
5.
CreswellJ. (2007). . In Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CrittendenA. (2001). . In The price of motherhood: Why the most important job in the world is still the least valued. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
7.
DoucetA. (2004). “It’s almost like I have a job and I don’t get paid:” Fathers at home reconfiguring work, care, and masculinity. Fathering, 2, 277–303.doi: 10.3149/fth.0203.277
8.
DoucetA.MerlaL. (2007). Stay-at-home fathering: A strategy for balancing work and home in Canadian and Belgian families. Community, Work, and Family, 10, 455–473.doi: 10.1080/13668800701575101
9.
GlassJ. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work-family policy and women’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations, 31, 367–294.doi: 10.1177/0730888404266364
10.
GomezM.FassingerR.ProsserJ.CookeK.MejiaB.LunaJ. (2001). Voces abriendo caminos (voices forging paths): A qualitative study of the career development among notable Latinas. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 286–300.doi: 10.1177/0011000006286990
11.
GoodmanW.CrouterA. (2009). Longitudinal associations between maternal work stress, negative work-family spillover, and depressive symptom. Family Relations, 58, 245–258.doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00550.x
12.
GrbichC. (1994). Women as primary breadwinners where men are primary caregivers. Journal of Sociology, 30, 105–118.doi: 10.1177/144078339403000201
13.
GreenhausJ.PowellG. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92.
14.
HillC. E, Knox, S.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N.HessS. A.LadanyN. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196–205.doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
15.
HoytW.BhatiK. (2007). Principles and practices: An empirical investigation of qualitative research in the. Journal of Counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 201–210.doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.201
16.
MorrowS. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260.doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
17.
ObermanY.JosselsonR. (1996). Matrix of tensions: A model of mothering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 341–359.doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00304.x
18.
PerroneK.WrightS.JacksonZ. (2009). Traditional and nontraditional gender roles and work-family interface for women and men. Journal of Career Development, 36, 8–24.doi: 10.1177/0894845308327736
19.
PoortmanA.Van der lippeT. (2009). Attitudes towards housework and childcare: The gendered division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 526–541.
20.
RobertsC. (2001). Content analysis. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2697–2702). Oxford: Elsevier.
21.
RochlenA.McKelleyR.SuizzoM.ScaringiV. (2008). Predictors of relationship satisfaction, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction among stay-at-home fathers. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 17–28.doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.9.1.17
22.
RochlenA.McKelleyR.WhittakerT. (2010). Stay-at-home fathers' reasons for entering the role and stigma experiences: A preliminary report. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 279–285.doi:10.1037/a0017774
23.
RochlenA.SuizzoM.McKelleyR.ScaringiV. (2008). ‘I’m just providing for my family’: A qualitative study of stay-at-home fathers. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 193–206.doi: 10.1037/a0012510
24.
SchultheissD. (2009). To mother or matter: Can women do both?. Journal of Career Development, 36, 25–48.doi: 10.1177/0894845309340795
25.
ShapiroM.IngolsC.Blake-BeardS. (2008). Confronting career double-binds: Implications for women, organizations, and career practitioners. Journal of Career Development, 34, 309–333.doi: 10.1177/0894845307311250
26.
TichenorV. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 638–650.doi: 10.2307/353566
27.
TichenorV. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating power and identity when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205.doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-5678-2
WhistonS.KellerB. (2004). The influences of family of origin on career development. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 493–568.doi: 10.1177/0011000004265660
31.
YehC.InmanA. (2007). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation in counseling psychology: Strategies for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 369–403.doi: 10.1177/0011000006292596
32.
ZuoJ.TangS. (2000). Breadwinner status and gender ideologies of men and women regarding family roles. Sociological Perspectives, 43, 29–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
