The current study investigates how college students expect to react to inequity in blended friendships. Blended friendship is defined as a friendship that involves interaction at work and outside of work. Data from undergraduate students (N = 185) showed that liking and relational importance were found to be lower in underreward and overreward situations versus equitable situations. Whether the inequity was in the task versus the social dimension of the blended friendship had a small effect on liking but did not affect relational importance. The results of this study could contribute to a general realistic job preview (RJP) to be given to graduating seniors as they prepare to enter the workforce or to employees as they enter new organizations.
Bridge, K., & Baxter, L.A. ( 1992). Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 200-225.
2.
Buunk, B.P., & Bakker, A.B. ( 1997). Responses to unprotected extradyadic sex by one’s partner: Testing predictions from interdependence and equity theory. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 378-397.
3.
Canary, D.J., & Stafford, L. ( 1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage . Communication Monographs, 59, 243-267.
4.
Canary, D.J., & Stafford, L. ( 1993). Preservation of relational characteristics: Maintenance strategies, equity, and locus of control. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 237-259). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Canary, D.J., & Stafford, L. ( 2001). Equity in the preservation of personal relationships . In J. H. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 133-151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Dainton, M. ( 2003). Equity and uncertainty in relational maintenance. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 164-186.
7.
Davidson, B., Balswick, J., & Halverson, C. ( 1983). Affective self-disclosure and marital adjustment: A test of equity theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45, 93-102.
8.
Fizel, J., Krautmann, A.C., & Hadley, L. ( 2002). Equity and arbitration in major league baseball. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 427-435.
9.
Hegtvedt, K.A. ( 1990). The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214-228.
10.
Joyce, A. ( 2005). Socializing with the boss can open career doors. Washington Post, January 9. Retrieved February 28, 2008, from www.washingtonpost.com
11.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. ( 1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
12.
Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. ( 1994). The judgment of equity in intimate relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 340-351.
13.
Leventhal, G.S., & Bergman, J.T. ( 1969). Self-depriving behavior as a response to unprofitable inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 153-171.
14.
Medvene, L.J., Teal, C.R., & Slavich, S. ( 2000). Including the other in self: Implications for judgments of equity and satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 396-419.
15.
Messman, S.J., Canary, D.J., & Hause, K.S. ( 2000). Motives to remain platonic, equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 67-94.
16.
Morgan, W.R., & Sawyer, J. ( 1979). Equality, equity, and procedural justice in social exchange . Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 71-75.
17.
Popovich, P., & Wanous, J.P. ( 1982). The realistic job preview as a persuasive communication . Academy of Management Review, 7, 570-578.
18.
Premack, S.L., & Wanous, J.P. ( 1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments . Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 706-719.
19.
RIS Media. (2008). Increase productivity at work by socializing with colleagues. South Florida Sun-Sentinel, February 14. Retrieved February 28, 2008, from www.rismedia.com
20.
Sias, P.M., & Cahill, D.J. ( 1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendship in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62, 273-299.
21.
Sprecher, S. ( 1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships . Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309-321.
22.
Sprecher, S. ( 1992). How men and women expect to feel and behave in response to inequity in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly , 55, 57-69.
23.
Sprecher, S. ( 2001a). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 599-613.
24.
Sprecher, S. ( 2001b). A comparison of emotional consequences of and changes in equity over time using global and domain-specific measures of equity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 477-501.
25.
Toegel, G., Anand, N., & Kilduff, M. ( 2007). Emotion helpers: The role of high positive affectivity and high self-monitoring managers. Personnel Psychology, 60, 337-365.
26.
Utne, M.K., Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., & Greenberger, D. (1984). Equity, marital satisfaction, and stability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 1, 323-332.
27.
Van Yperen, N.W., & Buunk, B.P. ( 1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 287-309.
28.
Vogl-Bauer, S., Kalbfleisch, P.J., & Beatty, M.J. ( 1998). Perceived equity, satisfaction, and relational maintenance strategies in parent-adolescent dyads. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 27-49.
29.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. ( 1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
30.
Walster, E., Walster, G.W., & Traupmann, J. ( 1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 82-92.
