We offer novel insights into the utilization of heterogeneous types of financial slack (unabsorbed, absorbed, and potential) by family versus non-family small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). We hypothesize that agency problems in family SMEs imply idiosyncratic effects on the ability to leverage the different types of financial slack, with implications for financial performance. Moreover, among family SMEs, having a family CEO can engender additional agency problems, reinforcing the heterogeneous effects of slack resources on performance. A longitudinal analysis of a panel dataset of Italian SMEs generally supports our expectations while revealing some counterintuitive findings regarding the effect of unabsorbed financial slack on performance.
AgustíM. A.GalánJ. L.AcedoF. J. (2021). Understanding the evolution of the slack–performance relationship from a bibliometric perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(3), 479–499.
2.
AgustíM. A.RamosE.AcedoF. J. (2021). Reacting to a generalised crisis. A theoretical approach to the consumption of slack resources in family firms. European Journal of Family Business, 11(2), 100–110.
3.
AlessandriT. M.CerratoD.EddlestonK. A. (2018). The mixed gamble of internationalization in family and nonfamily firms: The moderating role of organizational slack. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 46–72.
4.
BanalievaE. R.EddlestonK. A.ZellwegerT. M. (2015). When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1358–1377.
5.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
6.
BauweraertsJ.ColotO. (2015). Does the risk of managerial entrenchment affect CEO dismissal in family SMEs?International Business Research, 8(10), 41.
7.
BecerraM.CruzC.GravesC. (2020). Innovation in family firms: The relative effects of wealth concentration versus family-centered goals. Family Business Review, 33(4), 372–392.
8.
BentleyF. S.KehoeR. R. (2020). Give them some slack—They’re trying to change! The benefits of excess cash, excess employees, and increased human capital in the strategic change context. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 181–204.
9.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96.
10.
BlackwellM.IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2009). Cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(4), 524–546.
11.
Blanco-MazagatosV.de Quevedo-PuenteE.CastrilloL. A. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 20(3), 199–213.
12.
BlumentrittT. P.KeytA. D.AstrachanJ. H. (2007). Creating an environment for successful nonfamily CEOs: An exploratory study of good principals. Family Business Review, 20(4), 321–335.
13.
BourgeoisL. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.
14.
BradleyS. W.ShepherdD. A.WiklundJ. (2011). The importance of slack for new organizations facing “tough” environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1071–1097.
15.
BradleyS. W.WiklundJ.ShepherdD. A. (2011). Swinging a double-edged sword: The effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 537–554.
16.
BromileyP. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk-taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 37–59.
17.
BurkartM.PanunziF.ShleiferA. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58, 2167–2202.
18.
CalabròA.TorchiaM.JimenezD. G.KrausS. (2021). The role of human capital on family firm innovativeness: The strategic leadership role of family board members. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 261–287.
19.
CambreaD. R.PonomarevaY.PittinoD.MinichilliA. (2022). Strings attached: Socioemotional wealth mixed gambles in the cash management choices of family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100466.
20.
CarneyM.Van EssenM.GedajlovicE. R.HeugensP. P. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta–analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 513–544.
21.
ChatterjeeS.LubatkinM. H.SchulzeW. S. (1999). Toward a strategic theory of risk premium: Moving beyond CAPM. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 556–567.
22.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.KellermannsF. W. (2009). Priorities, Resource Stocks, and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(3), 739–760.
23.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354.
24.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF.WuZ. Y. (2011). Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 472–488.
25.
ConzE.MagnaniG.ZucchellaA.De MassisA. (2023). Responding to unexpected crises: The roles of slack resources and entrepreneurial attitude to build resilience. Small Business Economics, 61, 957–981.
26.
CorbettaG.MontemerloD. (1999). Ownership, governance, and management issues in small and medium-size family businesses: A comparison of Italy and the United States. Family Business Review, 12(4), 361–374.
27.
CucculelliM.PeruzziV. (2020). Post-crisis firm survival, business model changes, and learning: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 54, 459–474.
28.
CucculelliM.StoraiD. (2015). Family firms and industrial districts: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(4), 234–246.
29.
DanielF.LohrkeF. T.FornaciariC. J.TurnerJ. R. A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565–574.
30.
DaspitJ. J.ChrismanJ. J.AshtonT.EvangelopoulosN. (2021). Family firm heterogeneity: A definition, common themes, scholarly progress, and directions forward. Family Business Review, 34(3), 296–322.
31.
DaspitJ. J.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.PearsonA. W.MahtoR. V. (2018). Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 293–300.
32.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.
33.
DebP.DavidP.O’BrienJ. (2017). When is cash good or bad for firm performance?Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 436–454.
34.
De BlickT.PaelemanI.LaverenE. (2025). Slack resources as anchors or accelerators in strategic changes: Family ownership as a moderator. Small Business Economics, 65, 585–611.
35.
DeephouseD. L.CarterS. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.
36.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 337–360.
37.
De MassisA.AudretschD.UhlanerL.KammerlanderN. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.
38.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344–364.
39.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.MazzolaP.MinolaT.SciasciaS. (2018). Conflicting selves: Family owners’ multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 362–389.
40.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.WrightM.KellermannsF. W. (2018). Sector-based entrepreneurial capabilities and the promise of sector studies in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 3–23.
41.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
42.
DurandR.VargasV. (2003). Ownership, organization, and private firms’ efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 667–675.
43.
DyerW. G. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–273.
44.
European Commission. (2020). User guide to the SME definition.
45.
Eurostat. (2008). Rev. 2–Statistical classification of economic activities in the European community.
46.
FinkelsteinS. (1992). Power in top management teams—Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538.
47.
GedajlovicE.LubatkinM.SchulzeW. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 899–912.
48.
GeigerS. W.CashenL. H. (2002). A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(1), 68–84.
49.
GeigerS. W.MarlinD.SegrestS. L. (2019). Slack and performance in the hospital industry: A configurational approach. Management Decision, 57(11), 2978–2996.
50.
GentryR.DibrellC.KimJ. (2016). Long–term orientation in publicly traded family businesses: Evidence of a dominant logic. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 733–757.
51.
GeorgeG. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661–676.
52.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
53.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.Nunez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95.
54.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.PatelP. C.ZellwegerT. M. (2018). In the horns of the dilemma: Socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1369–1397.
55.
GonzálezM.GuzmánA.PomboC.TrujilloM.-A. (2014). Family involvement and dividend policy in closely held firms. Family Business Review, 27(4), 365–385.
56.
GreveH. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.
57.
HambrickD. C.D’AveniR. A. (1988). Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 1–23.
58.
HerreroI. (2011). Agency costs, family ties, and firm efficiency. Journal of Management, 37(3), 887–904.
59.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
60.
HoltD. T.PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.BarnettT. (2017). Family firm (s) outcomes model: Structuring financial and nonfinancial outcomes across the family and firm. Family Business Review, 30(2), 182–202.
61.
HullC. E.RothenbergS. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.
IyerD. N.MillerK. D. (2008). Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 808–822.
64.
JaskiewiczP.BlockJ. H.CombsJ. G.MillerD. (2017). The effects of founder and family ownership on hired CEOs’ incentives and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 73–103.
65.
JensenM. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(3), 323–329.
66.
KeatsB. W.HittM. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 570–598.
67.
KimC.BettisR. A. (2014). Cash is surprisingly valuable as a strategic asset. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 2053–2063.
68.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FrattiniF.KammerlanderN. (2020). Motivation gaps and implementation traps: The paradoxical and time-varying effects of family ownership on firm absorptive capacity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(1), 2–25.
69.
KutnerM. H.NachtsheimC.NeterJ. (2004). Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/papers2://publication/uuid/919E0EFB-6AF7-4B7B-A210-AD5035CFF228
70.
LaffranchiniG.BraunM. (2014). Slack in family firms: Evidence from Italy (2006-2010). Journal of Family Business Management, 4(2), 171–193.
71.
LapeiraM.SamaraG.KunduS.KumaraswamyA. (2024). To export or to FDI? A configurational approach to family firm internationalization. Journal of World Business, 59(2), 101506.
72.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731–746.
73.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2018). Looking back at and forward from: “Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities.”Family Business Review, 31(2), 229–237.
74.
LefebvreV. (2023). Mobilizing potential slack and firm performance: Evidence from French SMEs before and during the COVID-19 period. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(4), 1719–1748.
75.
LevieJ.LernerM. (2009). Resource mobilization and performance in family and nonfamily businesses in the United Kingdom. Family Business Review, 22(1), 25–38.
76.
LiM.SimerlyR. L. (1998). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the ownership and performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 19(2), 169–179.
77.
LinW. T.ChengK. Y.LiuY. (2009). Organizational slack and firm’s internationalization: A longitudinal study of high-technology firms. Journal of World Business, 44(4), 397–406.
78.
LiuY.ChenY. J.WangL. C. (2017). Family business, innovation and organizational slack in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1), 193–213.
79.
LubatkinM. H.SchulzeW. S.LingY.DinoR. N. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 313–330.
80.
MadisonK.HoltD. T.KellermannsF. W.RanftA. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1), 65–93.
81.
MartinG.Gómez–MejíaL. R.BerroneP.MakriM. (2017). Conflict between controlling family owners and minority shareholders: Much ado about nothing?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 999–1027.
82.
MichielsA.MollyV. (2017). Financing decisions in family businesses: A review and suggestions for developing the field. Family Business Review, 30(4), 369–399.
83.
MichielsA.VoordeckersW.LybaertN.SteijversT. (2015). Dividends and family governance practices in private family firms. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 299–314.
84.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press.
85.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2021). Family firms: A breed of extremes?Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 45(4), 663–681.
86.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.MinichilliA.CorbettaG.PittinoD. (2014). When do non-family CEOs outperform in family firms? Agency and behavioural agency perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 547–572.
87.
MillerD.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 553–571.
88.
MinolaT.BrumanaM.CampopianoG.GarrettR. P.CassiaL. (2016). Corporate venturing in family business: A developmental approach of the enterprising family. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(4), 395–412.
89.
MorckR.YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382.
90.
MountM. P.ErtugG.KavusanK.GeorgeG.ZouT. (2024). Reeling in the slack: An integrative review to reinstate slack as a central theoretical construct for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 18(2), 473–505.
91.
MunjalS.RequejoI.KunduS. K. (2019). Offshore outsourcing and firm performance: Moderating effects of size, growth and slack resources. Journal of Business Research, 103, 484–494.
92.
NeckebrouckJ.SchulzeW.ZellwegerT. (2018). Are family firms good employers?Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 553–585.
93.
NeubaumD. O.KammerlanderN.BrighamK. H. (2019). Capturing family firm heterogeneity: How taxonomies and typologies can help the field move forward. Family Business Review, 32, 106–130.
94.
NohriaN.GulatiR. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation?Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.
95.
NordqvistM.SharmaP.ChiricoF. (2014). Family firm heterogeneity and governance: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 192–209.
96.
O’DonoghueT.RabinM. (2000). The economics of immediate gratification. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(2), 233–250.
97.
PittinoD.MartínezA. B.ChiricoF.GalvánR. S. (2018). Psychological ownership, knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: The moderating role of governance heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 312–326.
98.
RauS. B.Schneider-SiebkeV.GüntherC. (2019). Family firm values explaining family firm heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 32(2), 195–215.
99.
RosenbuschN.BrinckmannJ.BauschA. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.
100.
SchulzeW.ZellwegerT. M. (2021). Property rights, owner-management, and value creation. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 489–511.
101.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2002). Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Managerial & Decision Economics, 23(4/5), 247–259.
102.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.
103.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.
104.
SimsekZ.VeigaJ. F.LubatkinM. H. (2007). The impact of managerial environmental perceptions on corporate entrepreneurship: Towards understanding discretionary slack’s pivotal role. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1398–1424.
105.
SinghJ. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 562–585.
106.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.
107.
StanleyL. J.Hernández-LinaresR.López-FernándezM. C.KellermannsF. W. (2019). A typology of family firms: An investigation of entrepreneurial orientation and performance. Family Business Review, 32(2), 174–194.
108.
SteijversT.VoordeckersW. (2009). Private family ownership and the agency costs of debt. Family Business Review, 22(4), 333–346.
109.
SuZ.XieE.LiY. (2009). Organizational slack and firm performance during institutional transitions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 75–91.
110.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43–62.
111.
TanJ.PengM. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.
112.
TerzaJ. V.BasuA.RathouzP. J. (2008). Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 531–543.
113.
TerziovskiM. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)in the manufacturing sector: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 892–902.
114.
ThalerR. H.ShefrinH. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392–406.
115.
TognazzoA.GubittaP.FavaronS. D. (2016). Does slack always affect resilience? A study of quasi-medium-sized Italian firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(9–10), 768–790.
116.
VanackerT.CollewaertV.PaelemanI. (2013). The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of venture capital and angel investors. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1070–1096.
117.
VanackerT.CollewaertV.ZahraS. A. (2017). Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1305–1326.
118.
VirkR.CornerA.CombsJ. G.JaskiewiczP. (2024). Social exchanges in family businesses: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 37(3), 320–346.
119.
VisintinF.PittinoD.MinichilliA. (2017). Financial performance and non-family CEO turnover in private family firms under different conditions of ownership and governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(5), 312–337.
120.
VossG. B.SirdeshmukhD.VossZ. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147–164.
121.
WangH.ChoiJ.WanG.DongJ. Q. (2016). Slack resources and the rent-generating potential of firm-specific knowledge. Journal of Management, 42(2), 500–523.
122.
WiklundJ.ShepherdD. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.
123.
WuZ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2007). Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 875–895.
124.
XuK.HittM. A. (2020). The international expansion of family firms: The moderating role of internal financial slack and external capital availability. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 127–153.
