Building on recent works calling for more tax research in the family business context, this study draws on the distinction between restricted and extended socioemotional wealth (SEW) to analyze how both SEW dimensions affect tax aggressiveness. Based on a sample of 201 private Belgian family firms, consistent findings from multiple regression analyses indicate that restricted SEW is positively related to tax aggressiveness, whereas extended SEW exerts a negative influence on tax aggressiveness. Our results also indicate that the family status of the CEO, CEO gender and CEO tenure moderate the relationship between both SEW dimensions and tax aggressiveness.
AlayoM.MasedaA.IturraldeT.CalabròA. (2023). We are family! The role of family members’ identification in the internationalization of family firms. European Management Journal, 41, 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.05.006
2.
AmriK.Ben Mrad DouagiF. W.GuedribM. (2023). The impact of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: Evidence from Tunisia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(1), 43–68.
3.
AnderssonF. W.JohanssonD.KarlssonJ.LodefalkM.PoldahlA. (2018). The characteristics of family firms: Exploiting information on ownership, kinship, and governance using total population data. Small Business Economics, 51, 539–556.
4.
AtwoodT. J.DrakeM. S.MyersJ. N.MyersL. A. (2012). Home country tax system characteristics and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1831–1860.
5.
Baixauli-SolerJ. S.Belda-RuizM.Sánchez-MarínG. (2021). Socioemotional wealth and financial decisions in private family SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 123, 657–668.
6.
BangN. P.RayS.KumarS. (2023). Women in family business research—What we know and what we should know?Journal of Business Research, 164, 113990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113990
7.
BartonJ.BainC.HennekensC. H.RosnerB.BelangerC.RothA.SpeizerF. E. (1980). Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed questionnaire. American Journal of Public Health, 70(8), 823–825.
8.
BauweraertsJ.Diaz-MorianaV.ArzubiagaU. (2020). A mixed gamble approach of the impact of family management on firm’s growth: A longitudinal analysis. European Management Review, 17(3), 747–764.
9.
BauweraertsJ.VandernootJ.BuchetA. (2020). Family firm heterogeneity and tax aggressiveness: A mixed gamble approach. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 37(2), 149–163.
10.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
11.
BorkowskiS. C.GaffneyM. A. (2021). FIN 48 and the tax aggressive behaviors of transnational corporations: A decade later. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 42, 100374.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100374
12.
BrighamK. H.PayneG. T. (2019). Socioemotional wealth (SEW): Questions on construct validity. Family Business Review, 2(4), 326–329.
13.
BruneA.ThomsenM.WatrinC. (2019a). Tax avoidance in different firm types and the role of nonfamily involvement in private family firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(8), 950–970.
14.
CarneyM.Van EssenM.GedajlovicE. R.HeugensP. P. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 513–544.
15.
ChenS.ChenX.ChengQ.ShevlinT. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.
16.
CirilloA.PennacchioL.CarilloM. R.RomanoM. (2021). The antecedents of entrepreneurial risk-taking in private family firms: CEO seasons and contingency factors. Small Business Economics, 56, 1571–1590.
17.
CruzC.JustoR.Larraza-KintanaM.Garces-GaldeanoL. (2019). When do women make a better table? Examining the influence of women directors on family firm’s corporate social performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 282–301.
18.
DaspitJ. J.ChrismanJ. J.AshtonT.EvangelopoulosN. (2021). Family firm heterogeneity: A definition, common themes, scholarly progress, and directions forward. Family Business Review, 34(3), 296–322.
19.
DebickiB. J.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.PearsonA. W.SpencerB. A. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 47–57.
20.
DekkerJ. C.LybaertN.SteijversT.DepaireB.MerckenR. (2013). Family firm types based on the professionalization construct: Exploratory research. Family Business Review, 26(1), 81–99.
DonelsonD. C.GlennJ. L.YustC. G. (2022). Is tax aggressiveness associated with tax litigation risk? Evidence from D&O insurance. Review of Accounting Studies, 27(2), 519–569.
23.
DuanT.DingR.HouW.ZhangJ. Z. (2018). The burden of attention: CEO publicity and tax avoidance. Journal of Business Research, 87, 90–101.
24.
DuongL.PallaschP. (2021). An examination of female CEOs and corporate tax aggressiveness: An interactive effect. Accounting, Organization & Economics, 1(1), 39–51.
25.
DyrengS. D.HanlonM.MaydewE. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61–82.
26.
EddlestonK. A.MulkiJ. P. (2021). Differences in family-owned SMEs’ ethical behavior: A mixed gamble perspective of family firm tax evasion. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 767–791.
27.
EddlestonK. A.SabilG. (2019). Women in family firms: Unsung heroes of business owning families. In CrittendenV. L. (Ed.), Go-to-market strategies for women entrepreneurs (pp. 185–194). Emerald Group Publishing.
FirfirayS.CruzC.NeacsuI.Gómez-MejiaL. R. (2018). Is nepotism so bad for family firms? A socioemotional wealth approach. Human Resource Management Review, 28(1), 83–97.
30.
FirfirayS.Gómez-MejiaL. R. (2021). Can family firms nurture socioemotional wealth in the aftermath of Covid-19? Implications for research and practice. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(3), 249–257.
31.
FlaminiG.VolaP.SonginiL.GnanL. (2021). The determinants of tax aggressiveness in family firms: An investigation of Italian private family firms. Sustainability, 13(14), 7654. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147654
32.
FordR. C.RichardsonW. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221.
33.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.
34.
Garcés-GaldeanoL.Larraza-KintanaM.CruzC.Contín-PilartI. (2017). Just about money? CEO satisfaction and firm performance in small family firms. Small Business Economics, 49, 825–839.
35.
GerkenM.HülsbeckM.OstermannT.HackA. (2022). Validating the FIBER scale to measure family firm heterogeneity-A replication study with extensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4), 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100497
36.
GoelS.VoordeckersW.Van GilsA.Van den HeuvelJ. (2013). CEO’s empathy and salience of socioemotional wealth in family SMEs-The moderating role of external directors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3–4), 111–134.
37.
Gómez-MejiaL. R.Baixauli-SolerJ. S.Belda-RuizM.Sanchez-MarinG. (2019). CEO stock options and gender from the behavioral agency model perspective: Implications for risk and performance. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 17(1), 68–88.
38.
Gómez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.
39.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
40.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HerreroI. (2022). Back to square one: The measurement of Socioemotional Wealth (SEW). Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4), Article 100480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100480
41.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
42.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
43.
HanlonM.HeitzmanS. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178.
44.
HanlonM.SlemrodJ. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1–2), 126–141.
45.
HasanM. M.LoboG. J.QiuB. (2021). Organizational capital, corporate tax avoidance, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 102050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102050
46.
HernandezM. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172–193.
47.
HsuehJ. W. J.De MassisA.Gómez-MejiaL. (2023). Examining heterogeneous configurations of socioemotional wealth in family firms through the formalization of corporate social responsibility strategy. Family Business Review, 36, 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865221146350
48.
HuybrechtsJ.VoordeckersW.LybaertN. (2013). Entrepreneurial risk taking of private family firms: The influence of a nonfamily CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Family Business Review, 26(2), 161–179.
49.
JaskiewiczP.DyerW. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30(2), 111–118.
50.
JaskiewiczP.LuchakA. A. (2013). Explaining performance differences between family firms with family and nonfamily CEOs: It’s the nature of the tie to the family that counts!Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1361–1367.
51.
KanagaretnamK.LeeJ.LimC. Y.LoboG. J. (2018). Cross-country evidence on the role of independent media in constraining corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(3), 879–902.
52.
KelleciR.LambrechtsF.VoordeckersW.HuybrechtsJ. (2019). CEO personality: A different perspective on the nonfamily versus family CEO debate. Family Business Review, 32(1), 31–57.
53.
KhelilI.KhlifH. (2023). Tax avoidance in family firms: A literature review. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 1021–1035.
54.
KimC.ZhangL. (2016). Corporate political connections and tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 78–114.
55.
KockF.BerbekovaA.AssafA. G. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330
56.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FrattiniF.KammerlanderN. (2020). Motivation gaps and implementation traps: The paradoxical and time-varying effects of family ownership on firm absorptive capacity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(1), 2–25.
57.
KovermannJ.VelteP. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance: A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 36, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.100270
58.
KovermannJ.WendtM. (2019). Tax avoidance in family firms: Evidence from large private firms. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 15(2), 145–157.
59.
KuoC. S. (2022). Family firms, tax avoidance, and socioemotional wealth: Evidence from tax reform in Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 58(4), 1535–1572.
60.
LaffranchiniG.HadjimarcouJ. S.KimS. H. (2020). The impact of socioemotional wealth on decline-stemming strategies of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 185–210.
61.
LaguirI.StaglianòR.ElbazJ. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness?Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 662–675.
62.
LanisR.RichardsonG. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108.
63.
LanisR.RichardsonG.TaylorG. (2017). Board of director gender and corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(3), 577–596.
64.
López-GonzálezE.Martínez-FerreroJ.García-MecaE. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 819–831.
65.
LuF.KwanH. K.ZhuZ. (2021). The effects of family firm CEO traditionality on successor choice: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 34(2), 213–234.
66.
MafrollaE.D’AmicoE. (2016). Tax aggressiveness in family firms and the non-linear entrenchment effect. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 178–184.
67.
MahtoR. V.ChenJ. S.McDowellW. C.AhluwaliaS. (2019). Shared identity, family influence, and the transgenerational intentions in family firms. Sustainability, 11(4), 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041130
68.
MarinovicI.VarasF. (2019). CEO horizon, optimal pay duration, and the escalation of short-termism. The Journal of Finance, 74(4), 2011–2053.
69.
MasedaA.IturraldeT.CooperS.AparicioG. (2021). Mapping women’s involvement in family firms: A review based on bibliographic coupling analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24, 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12278
70.
MemiliE.FangH.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA. (2015). The impact of small-and medium-sized family firms on economic growth. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 771–785.
71.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 4(38), 713–720.
72.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2021). Family firms: A breed of extremes?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 663–681.
73.
MooreJ. A.SuhS.WernerE. M. (2017). Dual entrenchment and tax management: Classified boards and family firms. Journal of Business Research, 79, 161–172.
74.
NawawiA.SalinA. S. A. P. (2018). Capital statement analysis as a tool to detect tax evasion. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(5), 1097–1110.
75.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
OrtasE.Gallego-ÁlvarezI. (2020). Bridging the gap between corporate social responsibility performance and tax aggressiveness: The moderating role of national culture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(4), 825–855.
RaczkowskiK.MrózB. (2018). Tax gap in the global economy. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 21(4), 567–583.
81.
RamosH. M.ManT. W. Y.MustafaM.NgZ. Z. (2014). Psychological ownership in small family firms: Family and non-family employees’ work attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 300–311.
82.
RichardsonG.LanisR.TaylorG. (2015). Financial distress, outside directors and corporate tax aggressiveness spanning the global financial crisis: An empirical analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 112–129.
83.
Rivo-LópezE.Villanueva-VillarM.Vaquero-GarcíaA.Lago-PeñasS. (2022). Do family firms contribute to job stability? Evidence from the great recession. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(1), 152–169.
84.
Sánchez-MarínG.Portillo-NavarroM. J.ClavelJ. G. (2016). The influence of family involvement on tax aggressiveness of family firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 6(2), 143–168.
85.
ShenW. (2003). The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: An evolutionary perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 466–476.
86.
ShiW.ConnellyB. L.LiJ. (2022). Excess control rights in family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(6), 806–828.
87.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill.
88.
SievinenH. M.IkäheimonenT.PihkalaT. (2022). The role of dyadic interactions between CEOs, chairs and owners in family firm governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(1), 223–253.
89.
SteijversT.NiskanenM. (2014). Tax aggressiveness in private family firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(4), 347–357.
90.
StrikeV. M.BerroneP.SappS. G.CongiuL. (2015). A socioemotional wealth approach to CEO career horizons in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 52(4), 555–583.
SwabR. G.SherlockC.MarkinE.DibrellC. (2020). “SEW” what do we know and where do we go? A review of socioemotional wealth and a way forward. Family Business Review, 33(4), 424–445.
93.
TsaiW. H.HungJ. H.KuoY. C.KuoL. (2006). CEO tenure in Taiwanese family and nonfamily firms: An agency theory perspective. Family Business Review, 19(1), 11–28.
94.
TsaoC. W.Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.ChenS. J. (2021). Firing managers: The benefits of family ownership and costs of family management. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100411
95.
WaldkirchM. (2020). Non-family CEOs in family firms: Spotting gaps and challenging assumptions for a future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 11(1), 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100305
96.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838.
97.
WisemanR. M.Gómez-MejiaL. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153.
98.
ZattoniA.GnanL.HuseM. (2015). Does family involvement influence firm performance? Exploring the mediating effects of board processes and tasks. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1214–1243.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
