This article brings together research on philanthropy, family business, and governance to examine patterns of giving by U.S. family versus nonfamily independent foundations. The authors use a sample comprising the 200 largest U.S. independent foundations in 2007 to show that family foundations are more focused in their grantmaking than nonfamily foundations. Board size moderates this relationship. They also offer a new typology of family foundations to show that the generation stage of the family and the foundation board’s composition are associated with different levels of grantmaking diversity in family foundations but in dissimilar ways. Scholarly and practical implications are discussed.
AksartovaS. (2003). In search of legitimacy: Peace grant making of US philanthropic foundations, 1988-1996. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 25-46.
2.
AndersonR. C.BatesT. W.BizjakJ. M.LemmonM. L. (2000). Corporate governance and firm diversification. Financial Management, 29(1), 5-22.
3.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage. Journal of Law & Economics, 46, 653-684.
4.
BaysingerB.HoskissonR. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate-strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 72-87.
5.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches and agenda for future research. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486511435355
6.
BradshawP.MurrayV.WolpinJ. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationships among board structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
7.
BrodyD.StrauchC. (1990). Who are the family foundations? Findings from the foundation management survey. Family Business Review, 3, 337-346.
8.
BrownW. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 317-339.
9.
CassonM. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 17(1), 10-23.
10.
DailyC. M.DaltonD. R. (1993). Board of directors leadership and structure: Control and performance implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17, 65-65.
11.
DaltonD. R.HittM.CertoS.DaltonC. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1-64.
12.
DaltonD. R.KesnerI. F. (1983). Inside/outside succession and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive replacement. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 736-742.
13.
de Andres-AlonsoP.Azofra-PalenzuelaV.Romero-MerinoM. E. (2010). Beyond the disciplinary role of governance: How boards add value to Spanish foundations. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 100-114.
14.
DiazW. A. (1996). The behavior of foundations in an organizational frame: A case study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 453-469.
15.
EisenmannT. R. (2002). The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 513-534.
16.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD.CannellaA. (2008). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17.
Foundation Center. (2007). Philanthropy annual: 2007 review. New York, NY: Author.
18.
Foundation Center. (2009). Key facts on family foundations. New York, NY: Author.
19.
GargS. (2011). Venture boards: Board functions, firm performance and differences with public firms. Stanford, CA: Stanford Technology Ventures Program.
20.
GersickK. E.DavisJ.McCollom HamptonM.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
GersickK. E.LansbergI.DavisJ. A. (1990). The impact of family dynamics on structure and process in family foundations. Family Business Review, 3, 357-374.
22.
GersickK. E.StoneD.DesjardinsM.GradyK. (2004). Generations of giving: Leadership and continuity in family foundations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
23.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.HaynesK. T.Nunez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
24.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.MakriM.KintanaM. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 223-252.
25.
GraddyE. A.MorganD. L. (2006). Community foundations, organizational strategy, and public policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 605-630.
26.
GudmundsonD.HartmanE. A.TowerC. B. (1999). Strategic orientation: Differences between family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 12, 27-39.
27.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.
28.
HallettA. C. (1990). Grant making, continuity, and diversity at the Wieboldt foundation. Family Business Review, 3, 409-412.
29.
HandlerW. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next generation family members. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37-51.
30.
HealeyJ. K. (1990). Continuity in two representative foundations. Family Business Review, 3, 415-417.
31.
HertzlingerR.KraskerW. S. (1987). Who profits from non-profits?Harvard Business Review, 65, 93-106.
32.
HillC. W. L.SnellS. A. (1988). External control, corporate-strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 577-590.
33.
HillmanA. J.DalzielT. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383-396.
34.
HoskissonR. E.HittM. A.JohnsonR. A.MoeselD. D. (1993). Construct validity of an objective (Entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 215-235.
35.
JacksonS. E.BrettJ. F.SessaV. I.CooperD. M.JulinJ. A.PeyronninK. (1991). Some differences make a difference—Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
36.
JohnsonJ. L.DailyC. M.EllstrandA. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 409-438.
37.
JudgeW. Q.ZeithamlC. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision-process. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 766-794.
38.
KatzS. N. (2005). What does it mean to say that philanthropy is “effective”? The philanthropists’ new clothes. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 149, 123-131.
39.
KepnerE. (1983). The family and the firm: A coevolutionary perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 57-70.
40.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad-news. Organizational Dynamics, 21, 59-71.
41.
LagemannE. C. (1999). Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42.
LawrenceS. (2000). Family foundations: A profile of founders and trends. New York, NY: Foundation Center.
43.
LettsC. W.RyanW.GrossmanA. (1997). Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 36-44.
44.
LynallM. D.GoldenB. R.HillmanA. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28, 416-431.
45.
McDonaldM. L.KhannaP.WestphalJ. D. (2008). Getting them to think outside the circle: Corporate governance, CEOs’ external advice networks, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 453-475.
46.
McDonaldM. L.WestphalJ. D. (2003). Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 1-32.
47.
MishraC. S.McConaughyD. L. (1999). Founding family control and capital structure: The risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 53-64.
48.
National Center for Family Philanthropy. (2006). Family philanthropy: What we don’t know (Special Report). Washington, DC: Author.
49.
National Center for Family Philanthropy. (2009). Family philanthropy: Current practices (Special Report). Washington, DC: Author.
50.
O’ReillyC. A.CaldwellD. F.BarnettW. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
51.
PalepuK. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 239-255.
52.
PearceI.JohnA.ZahraS. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 411-438.
53.
PendergastJ. M.WardJ. L.De PontetS. B. (2011). Building a successful family business board: A guide for leaders, directors, and families. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
54.
PfefferJ. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: Organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 218-228.
55.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (1999). Philanthropy’s new agenda: Creating value. Harvard Business Review, 77(6), 121-130.
56.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-68.
57.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.
58.
ShawM. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The social psychology of small group behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
59.
StewartA.HittM. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58-86.
60.
ThomsenS.PedersenT. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 689-705.
61.
WardJ. L. (1997). Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review, 10, 323-337.
62.
YermackD. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185-211.
63.
ZahraS. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 23-40.
64.
ZaldM. N. (1969). Power and functions of boards of directors: Theoretical synthesis. American Journal of Sociology, 75(1), 97-111.
65.
ZellwegerT. M.AstrachanJ. H. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21, 347-363.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
