Non-family managers play a crucial role in fostering innovation within family firms, yet their impact remains debated due to inconsistent research findings and a lack of comprehensive synthesis. This study integrates this effect through a meta-analysis of 213 effect sizes from 101 studies. The results demonstrate a positive influence of non-family managers on firm innovation, with a stronger effect on inputs than on outputs. Furthermore, this study identifies key governance and managerial contingencies at the firm level. First-generation control weakens this relationship, while non-family TMTs strengthen it. The implications for theory and practice are discussed, with suggestions for future research.
AdamsR.BessantJ.PhelpsR. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.
2.
AlayoM.IturraldeT.MasedaA. (2022). Innovation and internationalization in family SMEs: Analyzing the role of family involvement. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 454–478.
3.
AlayoM.MasedaA.IturraldeT.ArzubiagaU. (2019). Internationalization and entrepreneurial orientation of family SMEs: The influence of the family character. International Business Review, 28(1), 48–59.
4.
ArzubiagaU.MasedaA.IturraldeT. (2019). Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: The moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management. Review of Managerial Science, 13(1), 1–31.
5.
AshwinA. S.KrishnanR. T.GeorgeR. (2015). Family firms in India: Family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 869–900.
6.
Baixauli-SolerJ. S.Belda-RuizM.Sánchez-MarínG. (2021). Socioemotional wealth and financial decisions in private family SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 123, 657–668.
7.
BauweraertsJ.Diaz-MorianaV.ArzubiagaU. (2020). A mixed gamble approach of the impact of family management on firm’s growth: A longitudinal analysis. European Management Review, 17(3), 747–764.
8.
BecerraM.CruzC.GravesC. (2020). Innovation in family firms: The relative effects of wealth concentration versus family-centered goals. Family Business Review, 33(4), 372–392.
9.
BeggC. B.MazumdarM. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101.
10.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Perez-GonzalezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691.
11.
BinacciM.PeruffoE.OrianiR.MinichilliA. (2016). Are all non-family managers (NFMs) equal? The impact of NFM characteristics and diversity on family firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(6), 569–583.
12.
BlockJ. H. (2011). How to pay nonfamily managers in large family firms: A principal-agent model. Family Business Review, 24(1), 9–27.
13.
BlockJ. H.HansenC.SteinmetzH. (2023). Are family firms doing more innovation output with less innovation input? A replication and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1496–1520.
14.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111.
15.
BornhausenA. M.WulfT. (2024). Digital innovation in family firms: The roles of non-family managers and transgenerational control intentions. Small Business Economics, 62(4), 1429–1448.
16.
CalabròA.VecchiariniM.GastJ.CampopianoG.De MassisA.KrausS. (2019). Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 317–355.
17.
ChangS. J.ShimJ. (2015). When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance?Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1297–1316.
18.
CheungM. W. (2019). A guide to conducting a meta-analysis with non-independent effect sizes. Neuropsychology Review, 29(4), 387–396.
19.
ChiricoF.KellermannsF. W. (2022). When does time enhance family firm performance? Examining family generation in control and family control dispersion through a mixed-gamble logic. Long Range Planning, 57, 102272.
20.
ChittoorR.DasR. (2007). Professionalization of management and succession performance—A vital linkage. Family Business Review, 20(1), 65–79.
21.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.FrattiniF.WrightM. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310–318.
22.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.MinolaT.VismaraS. (2016). Management processes and strategy execution in family firms: From “what” to “how.”Small Business Economics, 47(3), 719–734.
23.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non–family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354.
24.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–575.
25.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.BergielE. B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 355–372.
26.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (2003). Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16(2), 89–107.
27.
ChungP. H.LeeC. J.WuH. L.LeeC. Y. (2023). Innovation promoter or inhibitor? Non-family CEO’s effect on innovation in family businesses. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(9), 3143–3155.
ClassenN.CarreeM.Van GilsA.PetersB. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595–609.
30.
ClassenN.Van GilsA.BammensY.CarreeM. (2012). Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 191–215.
31.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
CombsJ. G.CrookT. R.RauchA. (2019). Meta-analytic research in management: Contemporary approaches, unresolved controversies, and rising standards. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 1–18.
33.
CrossanM. M.ApaydinM. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.
34.
CruzC. C.Gómez-MejiaL. R.BecerraM. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89.
35.
CruzC. C.NordqvistM. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 33–49.
36.
D’AngeloA.KuivalainenO.MajocchiA.ZucchellaA.BuckT. (2013). Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: Insights from an Italian sample. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 80–105.
37.
DaspitJ. J.ChrismanJ. J.AshtonT.EvangelopoulosN. (2021). Family firm heterogeneity: A definition, common themes, scholarly progress, and directions forward. Family Business Review, 34(3), 296–322.
38.
De MassisA.AudretschD.UhlanerL.KammerlanderN. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.
39.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344–364.
40.
Diéguez-SotoJ.DuréndezA.García-Pérez-de-LemaD.Ruiz-PalomoD. (2016). Technological, management, and persistent innovation in small and medium family firms: The influence of professionalism. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 33(4), 332–346.
41.
DuranP.KammerlanderN.van EssenM.ZellwegerT. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264.
42.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463.
43.
EggerM.SmithG. D.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.
44.
EklundJ.PalmbergJ.WibergD. (2013). Inherited corporate control and returns on investment. Small Business Economics, 41(2), 419–431.
45.
FangH. C.ChrismanJ. J.DaspitJ. J.MadisonK. (2022). Do nonfamily managers enhance family firm performance?Small Business Economics, 58(3), 1459–1474.
46.
FangH. C.MemiliE.ChrismanJ. J.PenneyC. (2017). Industry and information asymmetry: The case of the employment of non-family managers in small and medium-sized family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(4), 632–648.
47.
FangH. C.RandolphR. V. D. G.MemiliE.ChrismanJ. J. (2016). Does size matter? The moderating effects of firm size on the employment of nonfamily managers in privately held family SMEs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 40(5), 1017–1039.
48.
FengX. (2018). Interactive effects of quality of government and family firm governance on R&D output. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(4), 578–603.
49.
FossN. J.LyngsieJ.ZahraS. A. (2013). The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1453–1471.
50.
Garcés-GaldeanoL.Larraza-KintanaM.CruzC.Contín-PilartI. (2017). Just about money? CEO satisfaction and firm performance in small family firms. Small Business Economics, 49(4), 825–839.
51.
GeyskensI.KrishnanR.SteenkampJ.-B. E. M.CunhaP. V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35(2), 393–419.
52.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CampbellJ. T.MartinG.HoskissonR. E.MakriM.SirmonD. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1351–1374.
53.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
54.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Larraza-KintanaM.MakriM. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226–237.
55.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.MakriM.KintanaM. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.
56.
HalderA.PrüglR.KraiczyN. D.HackA. (2023). The family factor: How collaborative dialogue between owner managers and the owner family shapes firm-level outcomes. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(4), 1411–1450.
57.
HambrickD. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
58.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
59.
HansenC.BlockJ. (2021). Public family firms and capital structure: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(3), 297–319.
60.
HecklerD. E. (2005). High-technology employment: A NAICS-based update. Monthly Labor Review, 128(7), 57–72.
61.
HedgesL. V. (1992). Modeling publication selection effects in meta-analysis. Statistical Science, 7(2), 246–255.
62.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
63.
HieblM. R. W.LiZ. (2020). Non-family managers in family firms: Review, integrative framework and future research agenda. Review of Managerial Science, 14(4), 763–807.
64.
HillebrandS.TeichertT.SteegerJ. (2020). Innovation in family firms: An agency and resource-based lens on contingencies of generation and management diversity. British Journal of Management, 31(4), 792–810.
65.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
66.
HumphreyR. H.MassisA. D.PiconeP. M.TangY.PiccoloR. F. (2021). The psychological foundations of management in family firms: Emotions, memories, and experiences. Family Business Review, 34(2), 122–131.
67.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. SAGE.
68.
HuybrechtsJ.VoordeckersW.LybaertN. (2012). Entrepreneurial risk taking of private family firms: The influence of a nonfamily CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Family Business Review, 26(2), 161–179.
69.
IstiplilerB.AhrensJ. P.BortS.IsaakA. (2023). Is exposure to the family firm always good for the next CEO? How successor pre-succession firm experience affects post-succession performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 167, 114179.
70.
JaskiewiczP.BlockJ.WagnerD.CarneyM.HansenC. (2021). How do cross-country differences in institutional trust and trust in family explain the mixed performance effects of family management? A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business, 56(5), 101196.
71.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
72.
JiangF.ShiW.ZhengX. (2020). Board chairs and R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese family-controlled firms. Journal of Business Research, 112, 109–118.
73.
KammerlanderN.PatzeltH.BehrensJ.RöhmC. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity in family-managed firms: The role of family involvement in top management. Family Business Review, 33(4), 393–423.
74.
KangH. C.AndersonR. M.EomK. S.KangS. K. (2017). Controlling shareholders’ value, long-run firm value and short-term performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 340–353.
75.
KarnaA.RichterA.RiesenkampffE. (2016). Revisiting the role of the environment in the capabilities–financial performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1154–1173.
76.
KathuriaA.KarhadeP. P.NingX.KonsynskiB. R. (2023). Blood and water: Information technology investment and control in family-owned businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(1), 208–238.
77.
KellyL. M.AthanassiouN.CrittendenW. F. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27–42.
78.
KepesS.BanksG. C.McDanielM.WhetzelD. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 624–662.
79.
KissA. N.BarrP. S. (2017). New product development strategy implementation duration and new venture performance: A contingency-based perspective. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1185–1210.
80.
KleinS.BellF.-A. (2007). Non-family executives in family businesses: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Family Business Studies, 1(1), 19–37.
81.
KraiczyN. D.HackA.KellermannsF. W. (2014). New product portfolio performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1065–1073.
82.
KraiczyN. D.HackA.KellermannsF. W. (2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334–348.
83.
LawrenceE. R.NguyenD. T.UpadhyayA. (2021). Are US founding families expropriators or stewards? Evidence from quasi-natural experiment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101987.
84.
LiangQ.LiX.YangX.LinD.ZhengD. (2013). How does family involvement affect innovation in China?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 677–695.
85.
LinW.-T.WangL. C. (2021). Family firms, R&D, and internationalization: The stewardship and socio-emotional wealth perspectives. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(1), 91–119.
86.
LingY.WeiL.KlimoskiR. J.WuL. (2015). Benefiting from CEO’s empowerment of TMTs: Does CEO–TMT dissimilarity matter?The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1066–1079.
87.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
88.
LumpkinG. T.SteierL.WrightM. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship in family business. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(4), 285–306.
89.
MaierM.VanderWeeleT. J.MathurM. B. (2022). Using selection models to assess sensitivity to publication bias: A tutorial and call for more routine use. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(3), e1256.
90.
MaskusK. E.MilaniS.NeumannR. (2019). The impact of patent protection and financial development on industrial R&D. Research Policy, 48(1), 355–370.
91.
MichielsA.VoordeckersW.LybaertN.SteijversT. (2013). CEO compensation in private family firms: Pay-for-performance and the moderating role of ownership and management. Family Business Review, 26(2), 140–160.
92.
MiglioriS.De MassisA.MaturoF.PaoloneF. (2020). How does family management affect innovation investment propensity? The key role of innovation impulses. Journal of Business Research, 113, 243–256.
93.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73–87.
94.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.
95.
MillerD.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 553–571.
96.
MinichilliA.ZattoniA.ZonaF. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55–74.
97.
MismettiM.RovelliP.BettinelliC.BergamaschiM. (2025). In the pursuit of innovation: The role of top management team functional diversity and open discussion in family firm innovation intentions. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12808
98.
MondalA.LahiriS. (2024). The role of inward FDI and family firm heterogeneity on foreign location choice: Evidence from India. Management International Review, 64(2), 245–278.
99.
NgP. Y.DayanM.MakriM. (2022). Influence of socioemotional wealth on non-family managers’ risk taking and product innovation in family businesses. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(2), 297–319.
100.
NielsenS. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 301–316.
101.
PatelP. C.CooperD. (2014). Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1624–1649.
102.
PiconeP. M.De MassisA.TangY.PiccoloR. F. (2021). The psychological foundations of management in family firms: Values, biases, and heuristics. Family Business Review, 34(1), 12–32.
103.
PinelliM.DebellisF.De MassisA. (2024). Long-term orientation, family-intensive governance arrangements, and firm performance: An institutional economics perspective. Small Business Economics, 63, 731–754.
104.
PittinoD.VisintinF.BauM.MazzuranaP. (2013). Collaborative technology strategies and innovation in family firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 17(1–3), 8–27.
105.
PongelliC.CaroliM. G.CucculelliM. (2016). Family business going abroad: The effect of family ownership on foreign market entry mode decisions. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 787–801.
106.
RödI. (2016). Disentangling the family firm’s innovation process: A systematic review. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 185–201.
107.
RödI. (2019). TMT diversity and innovation ambidexterity in family firms: The mediating role of open innovation breadth. Journal of Family Business Management, 9(4), 377–392.
108.
RondiE.De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2019). Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 100236.
109.
RondiE.De MassisA.KrausS. (2021). Servitization through open service innovation in family firms: Exploring the ability-willingness paradox. Journal of Business Research, 135, 436–444.
110.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.
111.
Sanchez-FamosoV.AkhterN.IturraldeT.ChiricoF.MasedaA. (2015). Is non-family social capital also (or especially) important for family firm performance?Human Relations, 68(11), 1713–1743.
112.
Sanchez-FamosoV.MasedaA.IturraldeT. (2017). Family involvement in top management team: Impact on relationships between internal social capital and innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(1), 136–162.
113.
Sanchez-FamosoV.PittinoD.ChiricoF.MasedaA.IturraldeT. (2019). Social capital and innovation in family firms: The moderating roles of family control and generational involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 101043.
114.
Sánchez-MarínG.PemartínM.Monreal-PérezJ. (2019). The influence of family involvement and generational stage on learning-by-exporting among family firms. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 311–334.
115.
ScholesL.HughesM.WrightM.De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2021). Family management and family guardianship: Governance effects on family firm innovation strategy. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(4), Article 100389.
116.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21(4), 331–345.
117.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP.ChiricoF. (2013). Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1), 69–85.
118.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP.KellermannsF. W. (2014). Family management and profitability in private family-owned firms: Introducing generational stage and the socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), 131–137.
119.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.
120.
SimonsT.PelledL. H.SmithK. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662–673.
121.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.
122.
SonfieldM. C.LussierR. N. (2004). First-, second-, and third-generation family firms: A comparison. Family Business Review, 17(3), 189–202.
123.
StanleyT. D.DoucouliagosH.HavranekT. (2024). Meta-analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions. Research Synthesis Methods, 15(2), 313–325.
124.
StewartA.HittM. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business?: Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58–86.
125.
SunW.HuangC.SuZ. (2023). How do non-family CEOs influence family firm innovation performance?Management Decision, 61(10), 2945–2972.
126.
SundaramurthyC.KreinerG. E. (2008). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 415–436.
127.
TaborW.ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.VardamanJ. M. (2018). Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 31(1), 54–79.
128.
TsaoS.-M.LinC.-H.ChenV. Y. S. (2015). Family ownership as a moderator between R&D investments and CEO compensation. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 599–606.
129.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce. (2023). 2023 International IP Index.
130.
VandekerkhofP.SteijversT.HendriksW.VoordeckersW. (2015). The effect of organizational characteristics on the appointment of nonfamily managers in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 28(2), 104–122.
131.
Van DoornS.TretbarT.ReimerM.HeydenM. (2022). Ambidexterity in family firms: The interplay between family influences within and beyond the executive suite. Long Range Planning, 55(2), 101998.
132.
VeveaJ. L.HedgesL. V. (1995). A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias. Psychometrika, 60, 419–435.
133.
ViechtbauerW. (2005). Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(3), 261–293.
134.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.
135.
ViechtbauerW.CheungM. W. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112–125.
136.
WilsonN.WrightM.ScholesL. (2013). Family business survival and the role of boards. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1369–1389.
137.
WuB. H. T.MazurM. (2018). Managerial incentives and investment policy in family firms: Evidence from a structural analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(4), 618–657.
138.
YeohP.-L. (2014). Internationalization and performance outcomes of entrepreneurial family SMEs: The role of outside CEOs, technology sourcing, and innovation. Thunderbird International Business Review, 56(1), 77–96.
139.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.SalvatoC. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363–381.
140.
ZonaF. (2016). CEO leadership and board decision processes in family-controlled firms: Comparing family and non-family CEOs. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 735–753.
141.
ZouT.ErtugG.GeorgeG. (2018). The capacity to innovate: A meta-analysis of absorptive capacity. Innovation, 20(2), 87–121.
142.
ZyburaJ.ZyburaN.AhrensJ. P.WoywodeM. (2021). Innovation in the post-succession phase of family firms: Family CEO successors and leadership constellations as resources. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(2), Article 100336.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
