Drawing on agency and behavioral perspectives, we disentangle two critical determinants of innovation strategies among family firms, namely, the family’s wealth concentration (WC) in its business and the family’s emphasis on family-centered goals (FCGs). Our results from a survey of Australian family firms show opposite and completely independent effects of WC and family-centered noneconomic goals on family firms’ innovation strategies. While higher WC is negatively associated with firm innovation, a greater emphasis placed on family-centered noneconomic goals has a positive impact, which seems to be the key determinant of innovation strategies in family firms.
AndersonR. C.MansiS. A.ReebD. V. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00067-9
3.
AndresC. (2008). Large shareholders and firm performance. An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.05.003
4.
ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
5.
BascoR. (2013). The family’s effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence approaches. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 42-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.12.003
6.
BascoR. (2017). Where do you want to take your family firm? A theoretical and empirical exploratory study of family business goals. Business Research Quarterly, 20(1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.07.001
7.
BennedsenM.FossN. (2015). Family assets and liabilities in the innovation process. California Management Review, 58(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.65
8.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
9.
BiancoM.BontempiM. E.GolinelliR.ParigiG. (2013). Family firms’ investments, uncertainty and opacity. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1035-1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9414-3
BlockJ. H.MillerD.JaskiewiczP.SpiegelF. (2013). Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review, 26(2), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513477454
12.
BloomN.Van ReenenJ. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351-1408. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351
13.
BrinkerinkJ.BammensY. (2018). Family influence and R&D spending in Dutch manufacturing SMEs: The role of identity and socioemotional decision considerations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), 588-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12428
14.
CalabròA.VecchiariniM.GastJ.CampopianoG.De MassisA.KrausS. (2019). Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 317-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12192
15.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M.BarberoJ. L. (2010). A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review, 23(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509345159
16.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.FrattiniF.WrightM. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207
17.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family–centered non–economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00407.x
18.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976-997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
19.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA.WangH. (2018). Reflections on family firm goals and the assessment of performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(2), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.02.001
20.
CovinJ. G.SlevinD. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
21.
CraigJ. B. L.MooresK. (2006). A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review, 19(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00056.x
22.
CraigJ. B. L.PohjolaM.KrausS.JensenS. H. (2014). Exploring relationships among proactiveness, risk-taking and innovation output in family and non-family firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12052
23.
DailyC. M.DollingerM. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, 5(2), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00117.x
De MassisA.Di MininA.FrattiniF. (2015). Family-driven innovation: Resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review, 58(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.5
26.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.FrattiniF.ChrismanJ. J.NordqvistM. (2016). Family governance at work: Organizing for new product development in family SMEs. Family Business Review, 29(2), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515622722
27.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.MazzolaP.MinolaT.SciasciaS. (2018). Conflicting selves: Family owners’ multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 362-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12257
28.
DuranP.KammerlanderN.Van EssenM.ZellwegerT. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
29.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004
30.
FeranitaF.KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2017). Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(3), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.07.001
31.
FiegenbaumA.ThomasH. (1988). Attitudes toward risk and the risk–return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.2307/256499
32.
FilserM.De MassisA.GastJ.KrausS.NiemandT. (2018). Tracing the roots of innovativeness in family SMEs: The effect of family functionality and socioemotional wealth. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), 609-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12433
33.
FinkelsteinS.CannellaS. F. B.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162073.003.0005
34.
FirfirayS.CruzC.NeacsuI.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2018). Is nepotism so bad for family firms? A socioemotional wealth approach. Human Resource Management Review, 28(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.008
GedajlovicE.LubatkinM. H.SchulzeW. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 899-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00459.x
37.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.HamptonM. M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of a family business. Harvard Business School Press.
38.
GersickK. E.FeliuN. (2014). Governing the family enterprise: Practices, performance and research. In MelinL.NordqvistM. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 196-225). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247556.n11
39.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CampbellJ. T.MartinG.HoskissonR. E.MakriM.SirmonD. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1351-1374. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12083
40.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653-707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
41.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
42.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.MakriM.KintanaM. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00889.x
43.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.NeacsuI.MartinG. (2019). CEO risk-taking and socioemotional wealth: The behavioral agency model, family control, and CEO option wealth. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1713-1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317723711
44.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.Nunez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069338
45.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.PatelP. C.ZellwegerT. M. (2018). In the horns of the dilemma: Socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1369-1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315614375
46.
GuQ.LuJ. W.ChungC. N. (2019). Incentive or disincentive? A socioemotional wealth explanation of new industry entry in family business groups. Journal of Management, 45(2), 645-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678450
47.
HoltD. T.PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.BarnettT. (2017). Family firm(s) outcomes model: Structuring financial and non-financial outcomes across the family and firm. Family Business Review, 30(2), 182-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516680930
48.
IngramA. E.LewisM. W.BartonS.GartnerW. B. (2016). Paradoxes and innovation in family firms: The role of paradoxical thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12113
49.
KammerlanderN.DessiC.BirdM.FlorisM.MurruA. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review, 28(4), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515607777
50.
KammerlanderN.GanterM. (2015). An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: Exploring the role of family CEOs’ non-economic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 361-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12205
51.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A.SarathyR.MurphyF. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9268-5
52.
KhandwallaP. N. (1977). Some top management styles, their context, and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7(4), 21-51.
53.
KönigA.KammerlanderN.EndersA. (2013) The family innovator's dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38(3). 418-441. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162
54.
KosmidouV.AhujaM. K. (2019). A configurational approach to family firm innovation. Family Business Review, 32(2), 154-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519827738
55.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family–centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12065
56.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FangH.FrattiniF. (2014). Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics, 43(3), 597-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9556-6
57.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FrattiniF.BianchiM.FangH. (2013). Technology acquisition in family and non-family firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1073-1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12046
58.
KraiczyN. D.HackA.KellermannsF. W. (2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12203
59.
LiH.Atuahene-GimaK. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069392
60.
LiangQ.LiX.YangX.LinD.ZhengD. (2013). How does family involvement affect innovation in China?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 677-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9320-x
61.
Lopez-FernandezM. C.Serrano-BediaA. M.Gómez-LópezR. (2016). Determinants of innovation decision in small and medium-sized family enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 3(2), 408-427. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2015-0028
62.
LumpkinG. T.BrighamK. H. (2011). Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00495.x
63.
LumpkinG. T.CogliserC. C.SchneiderD. R. (2009). Understanding and measuring autonomy: An entrepreneurial orientation perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00280.x
64.
MartinG.Gomez-MejiaL. (2016). The relationship between socioemotional and financial wealth. Management Research, 14(3), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2016-0638
Meroño-CerdánA. L.López-NicolásC.Molina-CastilloF. J. (2018). Risk aversion, innovation and performance in family firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1325569
67.
MilesR.SnowC. (1978). Organization strategy, structure and process. McGraw-Hill.
68.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press.
69.
MorckR. K.StangelandD. A. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth. In MorckR. K. (Ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 319-371). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226536828.001.0001
MunariF.OrianiR.SobreroM. (2010). The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39(8), 1093-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.004
72.
Muñoz-BullónF.Sanchez-BuenoM. J. (2011). The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510396870
73.
NaldiL.NordqvistM.SjöbergK.WiklundJ. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00082.x
74.
NietoM. J.SantamariaL.FernandezZ. (2015). Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 382-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12075
75.
PatelP. C.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2119
76.
PorterM. E. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press. (Original work published 1980)
77.
SchulzeW. S.KellermannsF. W. (2015). Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12159
78.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BucholtzA. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organizations Science, 12(2), 99-246. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
79.
SciasciaS.NordqvistM.MazzolaP.De MassisA. (2015). Family ownership and R&D intensity in small-and medium-sized firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12204
80.
ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.BrighamK. H.LumpkinG. T.BrobergJ. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486508327823
SorensonR. L. (2000). The contribution of leadership style and practices to family and business success. Family Business Review, 13(3), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00183.x
83.
SouderD.ZaheerA.SapienzaH.RanucciR. (2017). How family influence, socioemotional wealth, and competitive conditions shape new technology adoption. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1774-1790. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2614
84.
StrikeV. M.BerroneP.SappS. G.CongiuL. (2015). A socioemotional wealth approach to CEO career horizons in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 52(4), 555-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12123
85.
VazquezP.RochaH. (2018). On the goals of family firms: A review and integration. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(2), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.02.002
86.
WisemanR. M.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192967
ZellwegerT. M.DehlenT. (2012). Value is in the eye of the owner: Affect infusion and socioemotional wealth among family firm owners. Family Business Review, 25(3), 280-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511416648
89.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S.NordqvistM. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25(2), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511423531
