Drawing on family firm heterogeneity research, we develop a typology of family firms using differences in family influence and firm life cycle. We offer hypotheses regarding the relationships between the different firm types and two important outcomes: Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and performance. Applying latent profile analysis to a sample of 684 Spanish and Portuguese family firms using variables related to family influence (i.e., ownership, family CEO) and firm life cycle (i.e., generational management, size, and presence of board of directors), we find four family firm types, which differentially affect EO and performance. Implications of our findings for EO, family firm performance, and the development of family firm typologies are discussed.
ArendR. J. (2013). Ethics-focused dynamic capabilities: A small business perspective. Small Business Economics, 41, 1-24.
2.
ArzubiagaU.IturraldeT.MasedaA.KotlarJ. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in family SMEs: The moderating effects of family, women, and strategic involvement in the board of directors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 217-244.
3.
AstrachanJ. H.KleinS. B.SmyrniosK. X. (2002). The F-Pec scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45-58.
4.
BammensY.VoordeckersW.Van GilsA. (2008). Boards of directors in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics Journal, 31, 163-180.
5.
BanalievaE. R.EddlestonK. A.ZellwegerT. M. (2015). When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1358-1377.
6.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
7.
BarringerB. R.BluedornA. C. (1999). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 421-444.
8.
BauweraertsJ.ColotO. (2017). Exploring nonlinear effects of family involvement in the board on entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 70, 185-192.
9.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25, 258-279.
10.
BlockJ. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 248-265.
11.
BolingJ. R.PieperT. M.CovinJ. G. (2016). CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 891-913.
12.
CalabròA.MussolinoD. (2013). How do boards of directors contribute to family SME export intensity? The role of formal and informal governance mechanisms. Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 363-403.
13.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-266.
14.
CarneyM.van EssenM.GedajlovicE. R.HeugensP. P. M. A. R. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 513-544.
15.
CarrC. (2005). Are German, Japanese and Anglo-Saxon strategic decision styles still different in the context of globalization?Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1155-1188.
16.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: The moderating role of family involvement. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22, 265-291.
17.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M.BarberoJ. L. (2010). A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review, 23, 27-44.
18.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M.BarberoJ. L. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: Family and environmental dimensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2, 90-100.
19.
ChiricoF.SirmonD.SciasciaS.MazzolaP. (2011). Resource orchestration in family firms: Investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement and participative strategy affect performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 307-326.
20.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.KellermannsF. W. (2009). Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and non-family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 739-760.
21.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.KellermannsF. W.ChangE. P. (2007). Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately-held family firms. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1030-1038.
22.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 467-472.
23.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 335-354.
24.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267-293.
25.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 555-576.
26.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2005). Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 237-248.
27.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. J. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 976-997.
28.
ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.SteierL. P.ChuaJ. H. (2013). The influence of family goals, governance, and resources on firm outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1249-1261.
29.
ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.TaggarS. (2007). Family influences on firms: An introduction. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1005-1011.
30.
ChuW. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 833-851.
31.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.ChangE. P. C. (2004). Are family firms born or made? An exploratory investigation. Family Business Review, 17, 37-54.
32.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
33.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103-1113.
34.
CovinJ. G.SlevinD. P. (1988). The influence of organizational structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 217-234.
35.
CovinJ. G.SlevinD. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 35-37.
36.
CraigJ. B.DibrellC.GarrettR. (2014). Examining relationships among family influence, family culture, flexible planning systems, innovativeness and firm performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 229-238.
37.
CraigJ. B. L.MooresK. (2006). A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review, 19, 1-10.
38.
CruzC.NordqvistM. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics Journal, 38, 33-49.
39.
DailyC.ThompsonS. (1994). Ownership structure, strategic posture, and firm growth: An empirical examination. Family Business Review, 7, 237-249.
40.
DaspitJ. J.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.PearsonA. W.MahtoR. V. (2018). Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 293-300.
41.
De MassisA.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183-199.
42.
DebickiB.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ.PearsonA. W.SpencerB. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7, 47-57.
43.
DebickiB. J.MatherneC. F.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J. (2009). Family business research in the new millennium: An overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Family Business Review, 22, 151-166.
44.
DotyD. H.GlickW. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19, 230-251.
45.
DotyD. H.GlickW. H.HuberG. P. (1993). Fit, equifinality, and organisational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1196-1250.
46.
DuranP.KammerlanderN.van EssenM.ZellwegerT. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output with family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1224-1264.
47.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 545-565.
48.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.FloydS. W.CrittendenV. L.CrittendenW. F. (2013). Planning for growth: Life stage differences in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1177-1202.
49.
EddlestonK. AKellermannsF. W.ZellwegerT. (2012). Exploring the entrepreneurial behavior of family firms: Does the stewardship perspective explain differences?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 347-367.
50.
FelthamT. S.FelthamF.BarnettJ. J. (2005). The dependence of family businesses on a single decision-maker. Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 258-270.
51.
FissP. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191-295.
52.
FrankH.KesslerA.RuschT.Suess-ReyesJ.Weismeier-SammerD. (2017). Capturing the familiness of family businesses: Development of the family influence familiness scale (FIFS). Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 709-742.
53.
GabrielssonJ.HuseM. (2005). Outside’ directors in SME boards: A call for theoretical reflections. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 1, 28-37.
54.
Garcés-GaldeanoL.Larraza-KintanaM.García-OlaverriC.MakriM. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: The moderating role of technological intensity and performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12. 27-45.
55.
GeJ.StanleyL. J.EddlestonK.KellermannsF. W. (2017). Institutional deterioration and entrepreneurial investment: The role of political connections. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 405-419.
56.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38. 1010-1037.
57.
GellatlyI. R.HunterK. H.CurrieaL. G.IrvingP. G. (2009). HRM practices and organizational commitment profiles. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 869-884.
58.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.HamptonM. M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
59.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesH. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
60.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM.MacMillanI. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.
61.
Hernández-LinaresR.KellermannsF. W.López-FernándezM. C. (2018). A note of the relationships between learning, market, and entrepreneurial orientations: The family business influence. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9, 192-204.
62.
Hernández-LinaresR.López-FernándezM. C. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and the family firm: Mapping the field and tracing a path for future research. Family Business Review, 31, 318-351.
63.
Hernández-LinaresR.SarkarS.CoboM. J. (2018). Inspecting the Achilles heel: A quantitative analysis of 50 years of family business definitions. Scientometrics, 115, 929-951.
64.
Hernández-LinaresR.SarkarS.López-FernándezcC. (2017). How has the family firm literature addressed its heterogeneity through classification systems? An integrated analysis. European Journal of Family Business, 7(1-2), 1-13.
65.
HienerthC.KeßlerA. (2006). Measuring success in family businesses: The concept of configurational fit. Family Business Review, 19, 115-134.
66.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behavior, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
HornsbyJ. S.KuratkoD. F.ZahraS. A. (2002). Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 253-273.
68.
HughesM.MorganR. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 651-661.
69.
HultG. T. M.KetchenD. F. (2001). Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 899-906.
70.
HuseM. (1990). Board composition in small enterprises. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2, 363-373.
71.
HuseM. (2000). Boards in SMEs: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 271-290.
72.
HuseM. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(S1), S65-S79.
73.
HuybrechtsJ.VoordeckersW.LybaertN. (2013). Entrepreneurial risk taking of private family firms: The influence of a nonfamily CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Family Business Review, 26, 161-179.
74.
JaskiewiczP.DyerW. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30, 111-118.
75.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
76.
JiangY.PengM. W. (2011). Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 15-39.
77.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30, 809-830.
78.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK.BarnettT.PearsonA. W. (2008). An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review, 21, 1-14.
79.
KeppelG.ZedeckS. (1989). Data analysis for research designs. New York, NY: Macmillan.
80.
KleinS. B.AstrachanJ. H.SmyrniosK. X. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 29, 321-339.
81.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2013). Socioemotional wealth across the family life cycle: A commentary on “Family business survival and the role of boards.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1391-1397.
82.
LeeT.ChuW. (2017). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Influence of family governance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8, 213-223.
83.
LingY.KellermannsF. (2010). The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 322-344.
84.
López-DelgadoP.Diéguez-SotoJ. (2015). Lone founders, types of private family businesses and firm performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 73-85.
85.
LubkeG. H.MuthénB. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21-39.
86.
LumpkinG. T.BrighamK. H.MossT. W. (2010). Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22, 241-264.
87.
LumpkinG. T.DessG. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.
88.
LumpkinG. T.DessG. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-451.
89.
McKeeD.MaddenT. M.KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2014). Conflicts in family firms: The good and the bad. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business (pp. 514-528). London, England: Sage.
90.
McLachlanG.PeelD. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
91.
MeyerA. D.TsuiA. S.HiningsC. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1175-1195.
92.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyL. J.VandenbergR. J. (2013). A person-centered approach to the study of commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 190-202.
93.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770-791.
94.
MillerD.FriesenP. H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24, 921-933.
95.
MillerD.FriesenP. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30, 1161-1182.
96.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
97.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73-87.
98.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2011). Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 35, 1051-1076.
99.
MillerD.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal, 34, 533-571.
100.
MinichilliA.CorbettaG.MacMillanI. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: “Familiness,” “Faultlines,” and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 205-222.
101.
MustakallioM.AutioE.ZahraS. A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review, 15, 205-222.
102.
MuthénB. O. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling: Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
103.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2009). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
104.
NaldiL.NordqvistM.SjobergK.WiklundJ. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20, 33-47.
105.
NeubauerF.LankA. G. (1998). The family business: Its governance for sustainability. London, England: Macmillan.
106.
NordqvistM.SharmaP.ChiricoF. (2014). Family firm heterogeneity and governance: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 192-209.
107.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of profiles in latent profile analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535-569.
108.
O’BoyleE. H.PollackJ. M.RutherfordM. W. (2012). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 1-18.
109.
PatelP. C.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 617-627.
110.
PieperT. M.KleinS. B.JaskiewiczP. (2008). The impact of goal alignment on board existence and top management team composition: Evidence from family-influenced businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 372-394.
111.
QuigleyT. J.CrosslandC.CampbellR. J. (2017). Shareholder perceptions of the changing impact of CEOs: Market reactions to unexpected CEO deaths, 1950–2009. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 939-949.
112.
QuinnR. E.CameronK. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29, 33-51.
113.
RaginC. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
114.
RauchA.WiklundJ.LumpkinG. T.FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33, 761-787.
115.
RevillaA. J.Pérez-LuñoA.NietoM. J. (2016). Does family involvement in management reduce the risk of business failure? The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 29, 365-379.
116.
RosenbuschN.RauchA.BauschA. (2013). The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task environment–performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39, 633-659.
117.
Sánchez-FamosoV.MasedaA.IturraldeT. (2014). The role of internal social capital in organizational innovation: An empirical study of family firms. European Management Journal, 32, 950-962.
118.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP.ChiricoF. (2013). Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 37, 69-85.
119.
ScloveS. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343.
120.
ShanP.SongM.JuX. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: Is innovation speed a missing link?Journal of Business Research, 69, 683-690.
121.
SharmaP. (2004). On overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
122.
ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.BrighamK. H.LumpkinG. T.BrobergJ. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22, 9-24.
123.
ShortJ. C.PayneG. T.KetchenD. J. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34, 1053-1079.
124.
SimonH. (2009). Hidden champions of the 21st century: Success strategies of unknown world market leaders. London, England: Springer.
125.
StanleyL. J.KellermannsF. W.ZellwegerT. (2017). Latent profile analysis: Understanding family firm profiles. Family Business Review, 30, 84-102.
126.
StenholmP.PukkinenT.HeinonenJ. (2016). Firm growth in family businesses: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and the entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Small Business Management, 54, 691-713.
127.
StewartA.HittM. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58-86.
128.
SundaramurthyC.LewisM. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 397-415.
129.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5, 43-62.
130.
TsaiW.KuoY.HungJ. (2009). Corporate diversification and CEO turnover in family business: Self-entrenchment or risk reduction. Small Business Economics, 32,57-76.
131.
van EssenM.CarneyM.GedajlovicE.HeugensP. (2011). Do U.S. publicly listed family firms differ? Does it matter? A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2011(1), 1-2.
132.
VandenbergR. J.StanleyL. J. (2009). Statistical and methodological challenges for commitment researchers: Issues of invariance, change across time, and profile differences. In KleinH. J.BeckerT. E.MeyerJ. P. (Eds.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions (pp. 383-416). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
133.
WagnerD.BlockJ. H.MillerD.SchensC.XiG. (2015). A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 3-13.
134.
WalesW. J.GuptaV. K.MousaF.-T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal, 31, 357-383.
135.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
136.
Weismeier-SammerD. (2011). Entrepreneurial behavior in family firms: A replication study. Journal of Family Business Management, 2, 128-138.
137.
WestheadP.HoworthC. (2007). “Types” of private family firm: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19, 405-431.
138.
WiklundJ.ShepherdD. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 71-91.
139.
WilsonN.WrightM.ScholesL. (2013). Family business survival and the role of boards. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1369-1389.
140.
YangX. L.StanleyL. J.KellermannsF. W.LiX. (2018). How family firm characteristics affect internationalization of Chinese family SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-018-9579-7
141.
YuA.LumpkinG. T.BrighamK. H.SorensonR. L. (2012). The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25, 33-57.
142.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.SalvatoC. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 363-381.
143.
ZahraS. A.NeubaumD. O.HuseM. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26, 947-976.
144.
ZellwegerT. M.EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 54-63.
145.
ZellwegerT. M.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23, 851-868.
